![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Vista default tree? I'm trying to find out what the file tree would contain and how it is arranged, if I had installed Vista Home Premium on my new machine and hadn't done anything else. If you wonder why I'd like to know, here is the why. Over the years I've been using computers, from DOS on to Vista, the architects of each OS had slightly different ways of thinking about paths and branches and all that. And so, as I transferred files from one to another, remnants of the various philosophies still come along. From time to time I made adjustments if their way of thinking didn't suit me. Anyway, I got a new computer with Vista Home Premium, and I wanted to have it useful as soon as possible, so I made a file transfer from my XP machine. Perhaps I shouldn't have, but let's not go into that now. I won't go into too much boring items, but for instance I now find two folders named Downloads, one Download, one My Downloads and a couple of others. And each was connected with a different idea of how things should be arranged. I find myself strangely interested in what I can figure out of Vista's ways of connection and searching and juxtapositions - the first time in memory that I can say that about anything Microsoft. But I can't see the tree for the forest of tangled connections. So my question. If you printed out the tree of a newly minted Vista equipped machine, what would it look like? thank you |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Vista default tree? Search the net for Vista and Junctions and you may find some answers. -- Leo If you can't annoy somebody, there is little point in posting. "Hogarth" <u33401@uwe> wrote in message news:70cf3a653ad24@uwe... > I'm trying to find out what the file tree would contain and how it is > arranged, if I had installed Vista Home Premium on my new machine and > hadn't > done anything else. If you wonder why I'd like to know, here is the why. > Over the years I've been using computers, from DOS on to Vista, the > architects of each OS had slightly different ways of thinking about paths > and > branches and all that. And so, as I transferred files from one to > another, > remnants of the various philosophies still come along. > From time to time I made adjustments if their way of thinking didn't suit > me. > Anyway, I got a new computer with Vista Home Premium, and I wanted to have > it > useful as soon as possible, so I made a file transfer from my XP machine. > Perhaps I shouldn't have, but let's not go into that now. > I won't go into too much boring items, but for instance I now find two > folders named Downloads, one Download, one My Downloads and a couple of > others. And each was connected with a different idea of how things should > be > arranged. > I find myself strangely interested in what I can figure out of Vista's > ways > of connection and searching and juxtapositions - the first time in memory > that I can say that about anything Microsoft. But I can't see the tree > for > the forest of tangled connections. > So my question. > If you printed out the tree of a newly minted Vista equipped machine, what > would it look like? > thank you > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Vista default tree? Leo wrote: >Search the net for Vista and Junctions and you may find some answers. > >> I'm trying to find out what the file tree would contain and how it is >> arranged, if I had installed Vista Home Premium on my new machine and >[quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >> would it look like? >> thank you Wow! that doesn't tell me what I asked for, it tells me (as far as I can tell) what the situation is. As noted in my original, I am no techie. But I think I can glean enough to lead me to what I should put where, and where things disappeared to (eg, Documents and Settings) and how to get there. It probably also explains why when I asked support at Forte Agent how to find the data files which in earlier versions of Agent were in the Agent directory, he replied: "As of version 4.2, Agent will by default place its data files in the Windows default location for program data. In Windows XP, this is "C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\Application Data\Forte\Agent" and in Windows Vista this is "C:\Users\<user>\Roaming\Forte\Agent" (NOTE: If your system was originally XP and upgraded to Vista, it's probably the XP path.)" and I couldn't find either one of those paths (and yes I had hidden files not hidden.) My mind is further boggled than usual. Thanks |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Vista default tree? Hogarth wrote: >>Search the net for Vista and Junctions and you may find some answers. >> >[quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >>> would it look like? >>> thank you > >Wow! that doesn't tell me what I asked for, it tells me (as far as I can tell) >what the situation is. As noted in my original, I am no techie. But I think >I can glean enough to lead me to what I should put where, and where things >disappeared to (eg, Documents and Settings) and how to get there. >It probably also explains why when I asked support at Forte Agent how to find >the data files which in earlier versions of Agent were in the Agent directory, >he replied: > >"As of version 4.2, Agent will by default place its data files in the >Windows default location for program data. In Windows XP, this is >"C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\Application Data\Forte\Agent" and in >Windows Vista this is "C:\Users\<user>\Roaming\Forte\Agent" (NOTE: If your >system was originally XP and upgraded to Vista, it's probably the XP path.)" > >and I couldn't find either one of those paths (and yes I had hidden files not >hidden.) > >My mind is further boggled than usual. > >Thanks Thread originator here again. Assuming anyone is still vaguely interested in this subject, I'll let you know that I found something that pretty much tells me what I needed to know. I don't get a tree, but an idea of what it is doing. http://www.cnet.com.au/software/oper...9272404,00.htm a "quick guide) to Vista's OS. Thanks again. It's been nice visiting here. -- Message posted via WindowsKB.com http://www.windowskb.com/Uwe/Forums....-file/200704/1 |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does Vista support STP (spanning tree)? | Chris Cohen | Vista networking & sharing | 0 | 07-16-2008 03:52 PM |
| Default file tree | George | Vista file management | 4 | 09-24-2007 12:59 AM |
| Vista keeps stealing default status from default printer computer | e.t. | Vista networking & sharing | 0 | 08-21-2007 09:40 PM |
| Is Family Tree Maker vs 16 compatible with Vista? | J Penley | Vista General | 2 | 08-04-2007 12:59 PM |
| Folder tree in Windows Vista | Marcel Maessen | Vista General | 4 | 07-31-2007 10:42 AM |