![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Maximum size of shadow copies / restore points I've noticed what appears to be an interesting quirk with shadow copies. It looks like Vista bases shadow copies on a "maximum space" rather then on a guaranteed minimum available space basis. While reasonable on the surface, there is one problem with this implementation. If you create a file larger then your shadow copy's maximum size, delete it, then recreate the file (potentially a few times), the effective result is that all shadow copies are lost even though there may be enough space for the cumulative changes to be stored on the volume in question. Is my interpretation of this situation correct? If so, is there any way to change how Vista acts? I would be quite happy for Vista to simply guarantee me a minimum of 10GB of available space on each logical partition, deleting shadow copies as needed when approaching the limit, rather them limiting shadow copies to a fixed total amount of space. I have run into this situation in the real world when working with 4.7GB file sets which were compressed and split into smaller parts for transmission. Despite having a 400GB drive, with over 100GB free at all times, I ended up with no shadow copies / restore points when I ended up needing to recover an unrelated file (luckily my file servers all generate shadow copies too, so I was able to recover the file) -- If quitters never win, and winners never quit, what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"? |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Maximum size of shadow copies / restore points Windows Vista reserves 15% of your hard drive(s) for shadow copies, by default. You can change this with the "vssadmin" command. If you have problems with the syntax, yell for help. "DevilsPGD" <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> wrote in message news:4uad931i9cfrqdfoknu8qca3uoeh80bep9@4ax.com... > I've noticed what appears to be an interesting quirk with shadow copies. > It looks like Vista bases shadow copies on a "maximum space" rather then > on a guaranteed minimum available space basis. > > While reasonable on the surface, there is one problem with this > implementation. If you create a file larger then your shadow copy's > maximum size, delete it, then recreate the file (potentially a few > times), the effective result is that all shadow copies are lost even > though there may be enough space for the cumulative changes to be stored > on the volume in question. > > Is my interpretation of this situation correct? If so, is there any way > to change how Vista acts? I would be quite happy for Vista to simply > guarantee me a minimum of 10GB of available space on each logical > partition, deleting shadow copies as needed when approaching the limit, > rather them limiting shadow copies to a fixed total amount of space. > > I have run into this situation in the real world when working with 4.7GB > file sets which were compressed and split into smaller parts for > transmission. Despite having a 400GB drive, with over 100GB free at all > times, I ended up with no shadow copies / restore points when I ended up > needing to recover an unrelated file (luckily my file servers all > generate shadow copies too, so I was able to recover the file) > > -- > If quitters never win, and winners never quit, > what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"? |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Administrator | Re: Maximum size of shadow copies / restore points If you need some details on what Robert suggested, then look at this site below. System Restore - disk space Shawn |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Maximum size of shadow copies / restore points In message <4C2CBF85-DFD9-4264-8382-0659853F227C@microsoft.com> "Robert Blacher" <rblacher@community.nospam> wrote: >Windows Vista reserves 15% of your hard drive(s) for shadow copies, by >default. > >You can change this with the "vssadmin" command. If you have problems with >the syntax, yell for help. Unfortunately the solution isn't that simple, it needs to guarantee a fixed amount of free space, rather then limit to a maximum size, otherwise as actual disk allocation changes we'll run out of disk space. I guess I'm more complaining about a poor implementation, with the side effect of hoping there was a fix by way of a reconfiguration, but I don't see anything in vssadmin. -- If quitters never win, and winners never quit, what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"? |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Administrator | Re: Maximum size of shadow copies / restore points You could use the "Backup and Restore Center" in the Control Panel (Classic View) to make a backup of you hard drive to a external device like a DVD or whatever. This way you do not have to worry about it being deleted when it runs out of space. Shawn |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| delete shadow copies and old restore points | mike_XP_Vista | Vista General | 2 | 07-09-2008 08:10 AM |
| System restore shadow copies | maeve | Vista General | 3 | 04-25-2008 05:11 PM |
| System Restore Points without shadow copy - there has got to be a way!! | Larry | Vista General | 9 | 11-23-2007 11:01 AM |
| Restore points and shadow copies | Marjay | Vista performance & maintenance | 3 | 07-21-2007 10:40 PM |
| Shadow Copies @GMT folder remains visible after restore | james3mg | Vista networking & sharing | 0 | 06-11-2007 03:35 PM |