![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum to discuss Windows Vista x64 and x86 systems. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
br> br> |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Separate partition no longer advisable for user-created files? On my new Vista Home Premium box I was planning to locate my user-created files (docs, pictures, music, and such) in a separate partition, as was a pretty straightforward and usual thing to do in XP. But complications soon emerged in Vista when I began experimenting with relocating personal folders using Move on the Location tab in Properties view, so I started hunting around on this forum for more information. The impression I now get is that using a separate partion in this way is probably no longer an advisable practice in Vista - not, at any rate, if it means having to do additional registry tweaks to eliminate duplicated Documents icons etc., AND with the likelihood that it could cause problems for legacy software programs. I'd be very interested to get some more expert views on this. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Separate partition no longer advisable for user-created files? David Newmarch wrote: > On my new Vista Home Premium box I was planning to locate my user-created > files (docs, pictures, music, and such) in a separate partition, as was a > pretty straightforward and usual thing to do in XP. But complications soon > emerged in Vista when I began experimenting with relocating personal folders > using Move on the Location tab in Properties view, so I started hunting > around on this forum for more information. > > The impression I now get is that using a separate partion in this way is > probably no longer an advisable practice in Vista - not, at any rate, if it > means having to do additional registry tweaks to eliminate duplicated > Documents icons etc., AND with the likelihood that it could cause problems > for legacy software programs. > > I'd be very interested to get some more expert views on this. I moved (My) Documents to D:\ using the 'Location' tab and have had no problems. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Separate partition no longer advisable for user-created files? You can use it the same way you did on the XP version. If you don't have a second partition, you have to create it in Disk Management, by shrinking C: drive, creating an unallocated space that can be made into a useable partition. -- Jerry One thing money can't buy, The Wagging Tail of a Dog. "David Newmarch" <DavidNewmarch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7E562DEC-FE0D-4FF0-80C3-F1D7F95D7C93@microsoft.com... > On my new Vista Home Premium box I was planning to locate my user-created > files (docs, pictures, music, and such) in a separate partition, as was a > pretty straightforward and usual thing to do in XP. But complications soon > emerged in Vista when I began experimenting with relocating personal > folders > using Move on the Location tab in Properties view, so I started hunting > around on this forum for more information. > > The impression I now get is that using a separate partion in this way is > probably no longer an advisable practice in Vista - not, at any rate, if > it > means having to do additional registry tweaks to eliminate duplicated > Documents icons etc., AND with the likelihood that it could cause problems > for legacy software programs. > > I'd be very interested to get some more expert views on this. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Separate partition no longer advisable for user-created files? From my perspective moving shell folders (the ones with the special Location tab in the folder's properties) is fine. And you don't have to use their Location tabs to move them. In fact, some get confused by the subsequent pop up dialogs that occur when they do do it via Location tab, and end up creating two folders, loosing the desktop.ini for the folder they intended to be their shell folder, etc., and don't know how to undo their dilemma. But moving them by other means, you need to be aware of this: If you Drag and Drop on the same drive, the default action is Move. If you Drag and Drop from one Drive to another, the default action is Copy (which is another way some end up with two folders). Using right-click dragging will give you a choice. Cut and Paste is another option to Move a folder or file, in which case the drive destination doesn't matter. I actually feel the Cut and Paste method is the safest and easiest. Once done this way, you can verify it's registry entry on the Location tab of the folder's Properties, and Restore Default will work as it should to restore it to the default location, should you want to. Too, don't try to move the entire UserName folder using Explorer. It's not a shell folder, and has no Location tab. The UserName folder contains several junction point files that can cause all kinds of chaos when moved across drives (moving the junction to a different location on the same drive only moves the junction, however moving it to another drive turns the junction point into a normal folder and moves all files there (leaving the targeted directory empty), just to point out one pitfall. Vista's junction points are pretty much pointers to shell folders. "David Newmarch" <DavidNewmarch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7E562DEC-FE0D-4FF0-80C3-F1D7F95D7C93@microsoft.com... > On my new Vista Home Premium box I was planning to locate my user-created > files (docs, pictures, music, and such) in a separate partition, as was a > pretty straightforward and usual thing to do in XP. But complications soon > emerged in Vista when I began experimenting with relocating personal > folders > using Move on the Location tab in Properties view, so I started hunting > around on this forum for more information. > > The impression I now get is that using a separate partion in this way is > probably no longer an advisable practice in Vista - not, at any rate, if > it > means having to do additional registry tweaks to eliminate duplicated > Documents icons etc., AND with the likelihood that it could cause problems > for legacy software programs. > > I'd be very interested to get some more expert views on this. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Separate partition no longer advisable for user-created files? I have moved all of my personal files to drive D: and have never looked back. I have been doing this since Windows 95, when I was dual booting with OS/2. Every computer since has had those same files, in the same folder, on drive D: I just looked in My Documents on D: drive and I have some files that are thirteen years old. Through many catastrophes, system rebuilds and new computers - I have never lost these important files (of course I backup the My Documents folder faithfully). I still dual or triple boot. These files are available to any system I boot into. Personally, I can not see any reason to do it any other way. -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "David Newmarch" <DavidNewmarch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7E562DEC-FE0D-4FF0-80C3-F1D7F95D7C93@microsoft.com... > On my new Vista Home Premium box I was planning to locate my user-created > files (docs, pictures, music, and such) in a separate partition, as was a > pretty straightforward and usual thing to do in XP. But complications soon > emerged in Vista when I began experimenting with relocating personal > folders > using Move on the Location tab in Properties view, so I started hunting > around on this forum for more information. > > The impression I now get is that using a separate partion in this way is > probably no longer an advisable practice in Vista - not, at any rate, if > it > means having to do additional registry tweaks to eliminate duplicated > Documents icons etc., AND with the likelihood that it could cause problems > for legacy software programs. > > I'd be very interested to get some more expert views on this. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Guest | RE: Separate partition no longer advisable for user-created files? I always use a separate partition for these files and, like prior replies, have never had a problem. In XP, I even backed them up on a separately installed drive in the event the main drive went down. The process is pretty straight forward, nearly the same as with XP. Just follow the instructions. "David Newmarch" wrote: > On my new Vista Home Premium box I was planning to locate my user-created > files (docs, pictures, music, and such) in a separate partition, as was a > pretty straightforward and usual thing to do in XP. But complications soon > emerged in Vista when I began experimenting with relocating personal folders > using Move on the Location tab in Properties view, so I started hunting > around on this forum for more information. > > The impression I now get is that using a separate partion in this way is > probably no longer an advisable practice in Vista - not, at any rate, if it > means having to do additional registry tweaks to eliminate duplicated > Documents icons etc., AND with the likelihood that it could cause problems > for legacy software programs. > > I'd be very interested to get some more expert views on this. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Files created by Powershell are over 2X bigger than files created bytext editor or cmd.exe. | tom.luxury | PowerShell | 4 | 05-27-2008 05:06 AM |
| Separate partition for swap file | Ferenc B. | Vista installation & setup | 2 | 08-27-2007 07:20 AM |
| storing all data files on a separate partition with Windows Vista | Joel Dahl | Vista General | 7 | 08-26-2007 12:02 PM |
| is it advisable to wait longer before installing Vista? | cherold | Vista General | 7 | 04-15-2007 11:28 PM |
| Installing Win XP Prof (SP2) on a separate partition? | =?Utf-8?B?S2plbGwgUi4gQ2hyaXN0ZW5zZW4=?= | Vista installation & setup | 9 | 07-21-2006 07:51 PM |