![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | hearts, freecell, etc. are too easy, is this negotiable? perhaps this is a bit self-incriminating, but one of my morning and nightime rituals is to play a few games of hearts, freecell, or solitaire to chill out. i have an old computer with xp and this new one with vista. the problem is, they're all so easy. i played about equally on both computers, but it has become jarring to play the vista version of these games because things just don't seem randomized the way they were in xp. is there a way to fiddle with the settings and actually randomize cards dealt and the order in which they are done so? in hearts, for example, when a hand is dealt, on xp, you would get good hands, and you would get bad hands. you never knew and so winning the game was generally quite difficult. thus, winning is quite fun and satisfying. (this is all sick, i know, but i know there are others out there that enjoy the basics.) in vista, its as if they want to hand me a hand of any card 10 and lower and one or two token face cards. and this is every hand. as such, winning is actually quite easy. further frustrating things, there's always the player who gets about four points the entire game. say i get the queen of hearts once by fluke. whatever. thirteen points. but north still has zero points. and then every damned turn, i'll take two or three, north takes one or two, and east and west take all the rest. five or six hands later, the game is over. and this happens in every game! why? something clearly isn't randomized. so, question posed again, can things actually be randomized? they clearly aren't, they're made so that everyone can win most of the time and that's pretty lame. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Win7 Ultimate 64bit | Re: hearts, freecell, etc. are too easy, is this negotiable? Sounds to me like you have entirely too much free time |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: hearts, freecell, etc. are too easy, is this negotiable? I was gonna say, how many ways can you randomly deal a deck of 52 playing cards? I mean random is random. Maybe you can borrow a server farm to generate "more" random numbers and reorder the cards based on those results, but really I mean you can only get just so good at games like Hearts, etc. Pick up a deck of cards and play on a coffee table, they cost like what... a buck? "03hdfatboy" <03hdfatboy.34o5v5@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net> wrote in message news:03hdfatboy.34o5v5@xxxxxx-mx.forums.net... Quote: > > Sounds to me like you have entirely too much free time ![]() > > > -- > 03hdfatboy > > MY Baby.... > RAIDMAX Smilodon Dirk-Tooth case > OCZ Extreme Gamer 850W PSU > ASUS P5W DH Deluxe > Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Kentsfield > VIGOR GAMING CLT-M2I 92mm Thermal Electric CPU Cooler > CORSAIR Dominator 4GB > ATI X1950XTX + ATI X1950CF > ATI HDTV Tuner (pre flag) > 400Gb, 320Gb SATA Seagate Barracudas > i-rocks e-SATA W/500Gb Seagate > 2 Sony/NEC Optiarc 7170A > Acer AL2216WBD > Logitech G15 Gamer & Mx518 |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hearts | Gaming | |||
| hearts | Vista Games | |||
| Hearts | Vista Games | |||
| Hearts | Vista Games | |||
| Hearts problem... | Vista Games | |||