![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Windows Experience Index Hi I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. I have added another 2Gb. As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. Shouldn't it have gone up? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Experience Index possibly you did not put in the same speed of memory as you had and the over all speed has been reduced accordingly. mikeyhsd@xxxxxx "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx Hi I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. I have added another 2Gb. As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. Shouldn't it have gone up? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Experience Index "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. > The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. > > I have added another 2Gb. > As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows > experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. > > Shouldn't it have gone up? There's a lot of theories as to why this is. What it seems to come to is many motherboards and some CPUs don't perform as well if you fill all four DIMM slots. See the following thread for most of the theories on why this happens. http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/24...channel-memory -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Experience Index On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:48:11 -0000, "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Hi > >I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. >The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. > >I have added another 2Gb. >As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows >experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. > >Shouldn't it have gone up? addressed. Don't put much stock in the WEI, though. Vista will run things much better with more RAM regardless of the score. WEI measures throughput, not amount. I had a 5.3 with 4GB. I went up to 8GB and my WEI dropped to 5.0 All other scores are 5.9, though. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Experience Index No. The memory score is based on memory throughput, rather than the amount. However, you will gain more from adding the memory than the actual throughput on most things. -- Dustin Harper dharper@xxxxxx http://www.vistarip.com | Vista Resource & Information Page "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. > The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. > > I have added another 2Gb. > As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows > experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. > > Shouldn't it have gone up? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Experience Index If the memory you added is not "exactly" the same speed it will add LATENCY even if it was faster memory. If indeed the memory is FASTER add it 1st and if slower put it in last. Latency can also occur do you MB design. Even though the rating is slightly slower you should still see an increase in system performance particularly when you run many programs or a few memory hogging ones. "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. > The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. > > I have added another 2Gb. > As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows > experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. > > Shouldn't it have gone up? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Experience Index You might find this discussion of WEI helpful to understanding what the numbers mean: http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/wi...es/458117.aspx -- -Chuck Walbourn SDE, XNA Developer Connection This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warrenties, and confers no rights. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Experience Index "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi > > I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. > The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. > > I have added another 2Gb. > As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows > experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. > > Shouldn't it have gone up? The WEI will be the number of the worst device on your system. It won't give you any credit at all for all the good stuff. Mine is down because I only have a few hundred GB of disk space, not a quadzillion. Everything else is 5.9, but the disk brings it to 5.2. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows Experience Index "John" <John@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:Ir-dnVFal4sW1XDanZ2dnUVZ_tijnZ2d@xxxxxx Quote: > "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx Quote: >> Hi >> >> I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. >> The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. >> >> I have added another 2Gb. >> As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows >> experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. >> >> Shouldn't it have gone up? > > The WEI will be the number of the worst device on your system. It won't > give you any credit at all for all the good stuff. Mine is down because I > only have a few hundred GB of disk space, not a quadzillion. Everything > else is 5.9, but the disk brings it to 5.2. > > is not about creating a number to brag about but to point out where the bottleneck is so you will have an idea on what would be the best upgrade to a system. -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Vista Home Premium x64, x32 | Re: Windows Experience Index Hi I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory. The index was 5.2, that was the memory score. I have added another 2Gb. As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5. Shouldn't it have gone up? |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Windows Experience Index | Drivers | |||
| Windows Experience Index | Vista General | |||
| Windows Experience Index goes down | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Windows Experience Index | Vista General | |||
| Windows Experience Index | Vista General | |||