Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista Games

Vista - Windows Experience Index

Reply
 
Old 03-22-2008   #1 (permalink)
Uncle Nobby


 
 

Windows Experience Index

Hi

I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.

I have added another 2Gb.
As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.

Shouldn't it have gone up?


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-22-2008   #2 (permalink)
mikeyhsd


 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index

possibly you did not put in the same speed of memory as you had and the over all speed has been reduced accordingly.




mikeyhsd@xxxxxx



"Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx
Hi

I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.

I have added another 2Gb.
As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.

Shouldn't it have gone up?

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-22-2008   #3 (permalink)
Kerry Brown


 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index

"Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Hi
>
> I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
> The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.
>
> I have added another 2Gb.
> As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
> experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.
>
> Shouldn't it have gone up?

There's a lot of theories as to why this is. What it seems to come to is
many motherboards and some CPUs don't perform as well if you fill all four
DIMM slots. See the following thread for most of the theories on why this
happens.

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/24...channel-memory

--
Kerry Brown
MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration
http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-22-2008   #4 (permalink)
Ron


 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:48:11 -0000, "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx>
wrote:
Quote:

>Hi
>
>I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
>The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.
>
>I have added another 2Gb.
>As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
>experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.
>
>Shouldn't it have gone up?
No. Adding more memory increases the time it takes for memory to be
addressed. Don't put much stock in the WEI, though. Vista will run
things much better with more RAM regardless of the score.

WEI measures throughput, not amount. I had a 5.3 with 4GB. I went up
to 8GB and my WEI dropped to 5.0 All other scores are 5.9, though.

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-22-2008   #5 (permalink)
Dustin Harper


 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index

No. The memory score is based on memory throughput, rather than the amount.
However, you will gain more from adding the memory than the actual
throughput on most things.


--

Dustin Harper
dharper@xxxxxx
http://www.vistarip.com | Vista Resource & Information Page


"Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Hi
>
> I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
> The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.
>
> I have added another 2Gb.
> As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
> experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.
>
> Shouldn't it have gone up?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-22-2008   #6 (permalink)
Spirit


 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index

If the memory you added is not "exactly" the same speed it will add
LATENCY even if it was faster memory. If indeed the memory is
FASTER add it 1st and if slower put it in last.

Latency can also occur do you MB design. Even though the rating
is slightly slower you should still see an increase in system performance
particularly when you run many programs or a few memory hogging
ones.

"Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Hi
>
> I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
> The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.
>
> I have added another 2Gb.
> As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
> experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.
>
> Shouldn't it have gone up?
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-24-2008   #7 (permalink)
Chuck Walbourn [MSFT]


 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index

You might find this discussion of WEI helpful to understanding what the
numbers mean:

http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/wi...es/458117.aspx

--
-Chuck Walbourn
SDE, XNA Developer Connection

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warrenties, and confers no rights.

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-28-2008   #8 (permalink)
John


 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index

"Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Hi
>
> I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
> The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.
>
> I have added another 2Gb.
> As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
> experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.
>
> Shouldn't it have gone up?

The WEI will be the number of the worst device on your system. It won't
give you any credit at all for all the good stuff. Mine is down because I
only have a few hundred GB of disk space, not a quadzillion. Everything
else is 5.9, but the disk brings it to 5.2.


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-28-2008   #9 (permalink)
Kerry Brown


 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index


"John" <John@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ir-dnVFal4sW1XDanZ2dnUVZ_tijnZ2d@xxxxxx
Quote:

> "Uncle Nobby" <unc@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:u6Go9rBjIHA.2268@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> Hi
>>
>> I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
>> The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.
>>
>> I have added another 2Gb.
>> As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
>> experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.
>>
>> Shouldn't it have gone up?
>
>
> The WEI will be the number of the worst device on your system. It won't
> give you any credit at all for all the good stuff. Mine is down because I
> only have a few hundred GB of disk space, not a quadzillion. Everything
> else is 5.9, but the disk brings it to 5.2.
>
>
The disk measurement is a measurement of throughput not free space. The WEI
is not about creating a number to brag about but to point out where the
bottleneck is so you will have an idea on what would be the best upgrade to
a system.

--
Kerry Brown
MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration
http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 03-29-2008   #10 (permalink)


Vista Home Premium x64, x32
 
 

Re: Windows Experience Index

Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by Uncle Nobby View Post
Hi

I have windows Vista which had 2Gb of memory.
The index was 5.2, that was the memory score.

I have added another 2Gb.
As its a 32bit OS only 3.5 GB is detected, but when I updated my windows
experience the score went down for 5.2 to 5.

Shouldn't it have gone up?
Also, you may have lost dual channel memory performance, depending on the type of RAM you installed.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Windows Experience Index Drivers
Windows Experience Index Vista General
Windows Experience Index goes down Vista performance & maintenance
Windows Experience Index Vista General
Windows Experience Index Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46