Vista Tutorial - Re: Windows XP, Not Windows Vista (!) Breathes Life into Dead Computers

11-09-2007

References: <4734f7f6$1@xxxxxx-privat.org> <OxbvLBzIIHA.3916@xxxxxx> <4734fcc0@xxxxxx-privat.org>
In-Reply-To: <4734fcc0@xxxxxx-privat.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 071109-0, 11/09/2007), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <u08L#ZzIIHA.4272@xxxxxx>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-76-175-60-147.socal.res.rr.com 76.175.60.147
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl
Lines: 1
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.vista.general:781454

teyebeareeus wrote:

Quote:

>>It's all irrelevant...just like you are...lol!

>
>
> Why is it irrelevant Frank? Many people may be wondering if they should
> upgrade their computers to vista.

Read the label capin' crunch. Vista is not XP+eye-candy...got it! Cause
if you don't understand that...and I don't think you do...cause you keep
comparing XP to Vista...then all comparisons will never wash. Vista is a
new OS got it? New. Different. Works differently than XP does got it?
So forget about comparing XP to Vista using the same hardware...won't wash.

Quote:

>
> This is an article that includes an vista-xp comparison of speed..

On the same hardware is a useless comparison.

Quote:

>
> the article clearly states that "XP is nowhere near as resource hungry as
> Windows Vista is"

That is correct. But "saving" resources is useless, to a degree, and I'm
speaking in Vista, resources not used are resources going to waste.

Quote:

>
> I have been saying this for more than a year... gee whiz!

Been saying what? That comparing XP to Vista on the same hardware, XP
will be faster?
Who cares, huh?
Frank

11-09-2007	#1 (permalink)
Frank Guest n/a posts	Re: Windows XP, Not Windows Vista (!) Breathes Life into Dead Computers References: <4734f7f6$1@xxxxxx-privat.org> <OxbvLBzIIHA.3916@xxxxxx> <4734fcc0@xxxxxx-privat.org> In-Reply-To: <4734fcc0@xxxxxx-privat.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 071109-0, 11/09/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Message-ID: <u08L#ZzIIHA.4272@xxxxxx> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-76-175-60-147.socal.res.rr.com 76.175.60.147 Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl Lines: 1 Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.vista.general:781454 teyebeareeus wrote: Quote: Quote: >>It's all irrelevant...just like you are...lol! > > > Why is it irrelevant Frank? Many people may be wondering if they should > upgrade their computers to vista. Read the label capin' crunch. Vista is not XP+eye-candy...got it! Cause if you don't understand that...and I don't think you do...cause you keep comparing XP to Vista...then all comparisons will never wash. Vista is a new OS got it? New. Different. Works differently than XP does got it? So forget about comparing XP to Vista using the same hardware...won't wash. Quote: > > This is an article that includes an vista-xp comparison of speed.. On the same hardware is a useless comparison. Quote: > > the article clearly states that "XP is nowhere near as resource hungry as > Windows Vista is" That is correct. But "saving" resources is useless, to a degree, and I'm speaking in Vista, resources not used are resources going to waste. Quote: > > I have been saying this for more than a year... gee whiz! Been saying what? That comparing XP to Vista on the same hardware, XP will be faster? Who cares, huh? Frank
My System Specs

Similar Threads
Thread	Forum
Windows XP, Not Windows Vista (!) Breathes Life into Dead Computers	Vista General
Re: Windows XP, Not Windows Vista (!) Breathes Life into Dead Computers	Vista General
Re: Windows XP, Not Windows Vista (!) Breathes Life into Dead Computers	Vista General
Second Life on Windows Vista Home	Vista Games
Half-Life 2 and Windows Vista RC1	Vista Games