![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | NDA clarifications? Seeing as Kevin seems to think there is an NDA for Windows Vista, could anyone point it out to me? As far as I know (including Andre I believe on this matter), we don't seem to think there is one. -- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? As I previously said, There is one for the TAP Beta Tester's, which includes anyone who has access to an Interim Build that is not labeled as a CTP Build! This includes Build 5342 and the Technical Tester's! "Zack Whittaker" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message news:exzeICaYGHA.4920@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Seeing as Kevin seems to think there is an NDA for Windows Vista, could > anyone point it out to me? As far as I know (including Andre I believe on > this matter), we don't seem to think there is one. > > -- > Zack Whittaker > » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk > » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org > » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk > » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and > not > of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared > that up! > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? Feel free to point out where this NDA is then - links, screenshots, something which we can visit and look for ourselves? I don't think any of us would want to break NDA, so feel free to help us with this one Kevin. -- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up! --: Original message follows :-- "Kevin John Panzke" <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23IdtvHaYGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > As I previously said, There is one for the TAP Beta Tester's, which > includes anyone who has access to an Interim Build that is not labeled as > a CTP Build! This includes Build 5342 and the Technical Tester's! > > "Zack Whittaker" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message > news:exzeICaYGHA.4920@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Seeing as Kevin seems to think there is an NDA for Windows Vista, could >> anyone point it out to me? As far as I know (including Andre I believe on >> this matter), we don't seem to think there is one. >> >> -- >> Zack Whittaker >> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk >> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org >> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk >> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no >> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and >> not >> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared >> that up! >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? Microsoft sends it to you, you sign it and either post or fax it back. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How to lose a war in Iraq http://webdiary.com.au/cms/?q=node/1335#comment-48641 ================================================= "Zack Whittaker" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message news:uhsg6KaYGHA.1348@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Feel free to point out where this NDA is then - links, screenshots, > something which we can visit and look for ourselves? > I don't think any of us would want to break NDA, so feel free to help us > with this one Kevin. > > -- > Zack Whittaker > » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk > » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org > » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk > » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not > of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared > that up! > > --: Original message follows :-- > "Kevin John Panzke" <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:%23IdtvHaYGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> As I previously said, There is one for the TAP Beta Tester's, which >> includes anyone who has access to an Interim Build that is not labeled as >> a CTP Build! This includes Build 5342 and the Technical Tester's! >> >> "Zack Whittaker" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:exzeICaYGHA.4920@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> Seeing as Kevin seems to think there is an NDA for Windows Vista, could >>> anyone point it out to me? As far as I know (including Andre I believe on >>> this matter), we don't seem to think there is one. >>> >>> -- >>> Zack Whittaker >>> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk >>> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org >>> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk >>> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no >>> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and >>> not >>> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared >>> that up! >>> >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? There is no information in the End User License Agreement notifying us that build 5342 is covered under NDA. (I just checked - Win Key + R > type in WinVer > click the EULA link) The NDA you are referring to covers dicussions made in the Technical Private Newsgroups and certain parts of Microsoft Connect. Internal Builds and certain builds distributed to some Microsoft TAP Customers are also covered under NDA. What is confusing you is the fact that you did not receive 5342 from MSDN, so you are assuming its under NDA. Its not, Microsoft distributed this build only to Tech Testers and TAP Customers because its not a build of quality similar to a Customer Technology Preview. Its just a snap shot preview showing a glimpse of whats taking place in the development towards BETA 2. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta "Kevin John Panzke" <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23IdtvHaYGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > As I previously said, There is one for the TAP Beta Tester's, which > includes anyone who has access to an Interim Build that is not labeled as > a CTP Build! This includes Build 5342 and the Technical Tester's! > > "Zack Whittaker" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message > news:exzeICaYGHA.4920@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Seeing as Kevin seems to think there is an NDA for Windows Vista, could >> anyone point it out to me? As far as I know (including Andre I believe on >> this matter), we don't seem to think there is one. >> >> -- >> Zack Whittaker >> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk >> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org >> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk >> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no >> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and >> not >> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared >> that up! >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? "Kevin John Panzke" <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23IdtvHaYGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > As I previously said, There is one for the TAP Beta Tester's, which > includes anyone who has access to an Interim Build that is not labeled as > a CTP Build! This includes Build 5342 and the Technical Tester's! I didn't sign or see any NDA for the beta program I'm in and we have access to 5342. -- Paul Smith, Yeovil, UK. Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User. http://www.windowsresource.net/ *Remove 'nospam.' to reply by e-mail* |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? Exactly, there isn't one for Vista )-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up! --: Original message follows :-- "Paul Smith" <Paul@nospam.windowsresource.net> wrote in message news:unHZfbaYGHA.3740@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > "Kevin John Panzke" <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:%23IdtvHaYGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> As I previously said, There is one for the TAP Beta Tester's, which >> includes anyone who has access to an Interim Build that is not labeled as >> a CTP Build! This includes Build 5342 and the Technical Tester's! > > I didn't sign or see any NDA for the beta program I'm in and we have > access to 5342. > > -- > Paul Smith, > Yeovil, UK. > Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User. > http://www.windowsresource.net/ > > *Remove 'nospam.' to reply by e-mail* > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? A Couple of Years Ago, when both Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 were getting Beta Tested, We used to have a Rule that said the following: "Any Build that is not getting Released to the General Public via Public Download is Under an NDA!" "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%2385p3ZaYGHA.1888@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > There is no information in the End User License Agreement notifying us > that build 5342 is covered under NDA. (I just checked - Win Key + R > type > in WinVer > click the EULA link) The NDA you are referring to covers > dicussions made in the Technical Private Newsgroups and certain parts of > Microsoft Connect. Internal Builds and certain builds distributed to some > Microsoft TAP Customers are also covered under NDA. > > What is confusing you is the fact that you did not receive 5342 from MSDN, > so you are assuming its under NDA. Its not, Microsoft distributed this > build only to Tech Testers and TAP Customers because its not a build of > quality similar to a Customer Technology Preview. Its just a snap shot > preview showing a glimpse of whats taking place in the development towards > BETA 2. > -- > -- > Andre > Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta > > "Kevin John Panzke" <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:%23IdtvHaYGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> As I previously said, There is one for the TAP Beta Tester's, which >> includes anyone who has access to an Interim Build that is not labeled as >> a CTP Build! This includes Build 5342 and the Technical Tester's! >> >> "Zack Whittaker" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:exzeICaYGHA.4920@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> Seeing as Kevin seems to think there is an NDA for Windows Vista, could >>> anyone point it out to me? As far as I know (including Andre I believe >>> on this matter), we don't seem to think there is one. >>> >>> -- >>> Zack Whittaker >>> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk >>> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org >>> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk >>> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no >>> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and >>> not >>> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we >>> cleared >>> that up! >>> >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? But this is now... not then. So feel free to throw us a link which has the NDA on please Kevin. -- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up! --: Original message follows :-- "Kevin John Panzke" <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ujeXPVbYGHA.2148@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >A Couple of Years Ago, when both Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows >Server 2003 Service Pack 1 were getting Beta Tested, We used to have a Rule >that said the following: "Any Build that is not getting Released to the >General Public via Public Download is Under an NDA!" > > "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:%2385p3ZaYGHA.1888@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> There is no information in the End User License Agreement notifying us >> that build 5342 is covered under NDA. (I just checked - Win Key + R > >> type in WinVer > click the EULA link) The NDA you are referring to covers >> dicussions made in the Technical Private Newsgroups and certain parts of >> Microsoft Connect. Internal Builds and certain builds distributed to some >> Microsoft TAP Customers are also covered under NDA. >> >> What is confusing you is the fact that you did not receive 5342 from >> MSDN, so you are assuming its under NDA. Its not, Microsoft distributed >> this build only to Tech Testers and TAP Customers because its not a build >> of quality similar to a Customer Technology Preview. Its just a snap shot >> preview showing a glimpse of whats taking place in the development >> towards BETA 2. >> -- >> -- >> Andre >> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com >> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com >> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre >> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta >> >> "Kevin John Panzke" <kevpan815@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:%23IdtvHaYGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> As I previously said, There is one for the TAP Beta Tester's, which >>> includes anyone who has access to an Interim Build that is not labeled >>> as a CTP Build! This includes Build 5342 and the Technical Tester's! >>> >>> "Zack Whittaker" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message >>> news:exzeICaYGHA.4920@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>> Seeing as Kevin seems to think there is an NDA for Windows Vista, could >>>> anyone point it out to me? As far as I know (including Andre I believe >>>> on this matter), we don't seem to think there is one. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Zack Whittaker >>>> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk >>>> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org >>>> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk >>>> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no >>>> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, >>>> and not >>>> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we >>>> cleared >>>> that up! >>>> >>> >> >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: NDA clarifications? Zack Whittaker wrote: > But this is now... not then. So feel free to throw us a link which has the > NDA on please Kevin. > Stop feeding him. He's been told this many times already. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| PowerShell, some clarifications required | Vista General | |||