![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | SP1 - what's in and what's not I was disconcerted to discover that there is nothing about Usability in the "Notable Changes in..." SP1 document (http://technet2.microsoft.com/window....mspx?mfr=true) (or the overview...) Certainly Reliability/Performance features of SP1 should improve the "user experience", and no doubt there is lots of Good Stuff generally (some improvements to UAC perhaps and certainly anything that reduces power consumption, increases security, etc.), but what about the bread-and-butter issues arising from almost every interaction with the system? I find the omission of any reference to improvements to the way the UI works most alarming; does it mean that it is not considered important enough? [I don't mean what goes on behind the scenes, I mean how information is presented etc.: the "Time remaining" calculation is probably getting better all the time - but why is the dialog there (and calculating) - when I have Cancelled a file delete?] Perhaps the issues below are addressed and the detail has been buried in some other document I haven't found - if so please direct me to it. My particular bete noire is Windows Explorer: inconstant Folder Views, the black-holes that are Folder Templates, the lack of control of automatic folder type discovery, absence of per window control of Preview, lack of preview handlers for older MS products (Office), accurate refresh of shortcuts to mapped (esp network) drives, absence of a "New Folder" button all of which (and more) are continually annoying and productivity sapping. Please sir, may I some more control of my own system? Why shouldn't I have a Slide Show button for a folder that contains images at root level just because it is not of type "Pictures and Videos" (even if I select only images)? Numerous networking issues also seem to be lacking in prominence: there's only one mention of IPv6 - but no mention of resolving the issues of IPv6 alonsgide IPv4 which seem to impact many users (especially those roaming on wireless networks) and digging out the IP address in use for a network adapter is just too tedious.... On the whole I like Vista, but the UI shortcomings are not mere quibbles to me; if I am asked what I think of Vista the answer has been "It's pretty good, BUT..." Speed increases, reliability enhancements, power reductions, etc. are incremental improvements to be welcomed but I was hoping for a step-change in usability that might eliminate that "BUT..." If such issues are not going to be addressed I am going to be incredibly disappointed... Am I labouring under a false impression? PS Brink - remember: I know all about the conspiracy now... <g> -- Julian I-Do-Stuff Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: SP1 - what's in and what's not Hello Julian, Pretty much in agreement. Here's how to make explorer behave a bit more like it should: http://www.windows-now.com/blogs/kmk...discovery.aspx The command script works as advertised and causes no problems. I suppose I should say, YMMV, but I think it's safe. And here's a discussion of it with big pics as visual aids and a bit of additional info: Windows Explorer Folder View settings Mike "Julian" <msforums@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23Sq7AGMPIHA.4740@xxxxxx Quote: >I was disconcerted to discover that there is nothing about Usability in the >"Notable Changes in..." SP1 document >(http://technet2.microsoft.com/window....mspx?mfr=true) >(or the overview...) > > Certainly Reliability/Performance features of SP1 should improve the "user > experience", and no doubt there is lots of Good Stuff generally (some > improvements to UAC perhaps and certainly anything that reduces power > consumption, increases security, etc.), but what about the > bread-and-butter issues arising from almost every interaction with the > system? > > I find the omission of any reference to improvements to the way the UI > works most alarming; does it mean that it is not considered important > enough? [I don't mean what goes on behind the scenes, I mean how > information is presented etc.: the "Time remaining" calculation is > probably getting better all the time - but why is the dialog there (and > calculating) - when I have Cancelled a file delete?] > > Perhaps the issues below are addressed and the detail has been buried in > some other document I haven't found - if so please direct me to it. > > My particular bete noire is Windows Explorer: > > inconstant Folder Views, > the black-holes that are Folder Templates, > the lack of control of automatic folder type discovery, > absence of per window control of Preview, > lack of preview handlers for older MS products (Office), > accurate refresh of shortcuts to mapped (esp network) drives, > absence of a "New Folder" button > > all of which (and more) are continually annoying and productivity sapping. > > Please sir, may I some more control of my own system? Why shouldn't I have > a Slide Show button for a folder that contains images at root level just > because it is not of type "Pictures and Videos" (even if I select only > images)? > > Numerous networking issues also seem to be lacking in prominence: there's > only one mention of IPv6 - but no mention of resolving the issues of IPv6 > alonsgide IPv4 which seem to impact many users (especially those roaming > on wireless networks) and digging out the IP address in use for a network > adapter is just too tedious.... > > On the whole I like Vista, but the UI shortcomings are not mere quibbles > to me; if I am asked what I think of Vista the answer has been "It's > pretty good, BUT..." Speed increases, reliability enhancements, power > reductions, etc. are incremental improvements to be welcomed but I was > hoping for a step-change in usability that might eliminate that "BUT..." > > If such issues are not going to be addressed I am going to be incredibly > disappointed... > > Am I labouring under a false impression? > > PS Brink - remember: I know all about the conspiracy now... <g> > -- > Julian I-Do-Stuff > > Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: SP1 - what's in and what's not Thanks for the input dubya - I got Kristian (?) Kenny's stuff quite a while back and it was a help - I agree - seems solid and safe.. I inspected the script before I ran it though...!) However, something (probably me) is still not right insofar as the "default" Folder Template now seems to be Photos and Videos, which is annoying because although Templates apply to everything, not everything can be Customised Do <sigh()> <rage("why?")> <rant()> Loop Until haveComeHome(Cows) = True I've exchanged a bit on this topic elsewhere and have a pending task to reapply the fixes but haven't got round to it... and I don't know what Vista thinks is "touching" folders in such a way as to require their settings to be remembered (?SyncToy?) but it seems to have the memory of a goldfish considering that I don't explicitly touch more than about a dozen folders a day and it sure seems to forget them pretty quickly (OK, some are networked drives or other non-native (e.g. an encrypted file mounted as a drive by Steganos Safe) but that shouldn't matter - I'm looking at this as a dumb user who doesn't care where the folders are... "oh sorry, your NAS is LINUX based and isn't compatible..." "But it *looks* like everything else on my desktop....!") [Oh yes... long discussion with an MVP on the Folder thing led to a list of the various constants for the Folder Templates, though darned if I can remember who or where or what now... <g>] But even if that was fixed, it still leaves all the other things (an incomplete list at best)... and, alas, like tootheache, the longer even dull pain persists the crankier one gets... I have asked if it's possible to script Windows Explorer views in any way but haven't had any luck in that direction either...! Again, appreciate the input and it's nice to know I'm not alone... -- Julian I-Do-Stuff Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com "dubya" <dubya54@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uWcf0xOPIHA.5720@xxxxxx Quote: > Hello Julian, > > Pretty much in agreement. Here's how to make explorer behave a bit more > like it should: > > http://www.windows-now.com/blogs/kmk...discovery.aspx > > The command script works as advertised and causes no problems. I suppose > I should say, YMMV, but I think it's safe. > > And here's a discussion of it with big pics as visual aids and a bit of > additional info: > > Windows Explorer Folder View settings > > Mike > > > > "Julian" <msforums@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:%23Sq7AGMPIHA.4740@xxxxxx Quote: >>I was disconcerted to discover that there is nothing about Usability in >>the "Notable Changes in..." SP1 document >>(http://technet2.microsoft.com/window....mspx?mfr=true) >>(or the overview...) >> >> Certainly Reliability/Performance features of SP1 should improve the >> "user experience", and no doubt there is lots of Good Stuff generally >> (some improvements to UAC perhaps and certainly anything that reduces >> power consumption, increases security, etc.), but what about the >> bread-and-butter issues arising from almost every interaction with the >> system? >> >> I find the omission of any reference to improvements to the way the UI >> works most alarming; does it mean that it is not considered important >> enough? [I don't mean what goes on behind the scenes, I mean how >> information is presented etc.: the "Time remaining" calculation is >> probably getting better all the time - but why is the dialog there (and >> calculating) - when I have Cancelled a file delete?] >> >> Perhaps the issues below are addressed and the detail has been buried in >> some other document I haven't found - if so please direct me to it. >> >> My particular bete noire is Windows Explorer: >> >> inconstant Folder Views, >> the black-holes that are Folder Templates, >> the lack of control of automatic folder type discovery, >> absence of per window control of Preview, >> lack of preview handlers for older MS products (Office), >> accurate refresh of shortcuts to mapped (esp network) drives, >> absence of a "New Folder" button >> >> all of which (and more) are continually annoying and productivity >> sapping. >> >> Please sir, may I some more control of my own system? Why shouldn't I >> have a Slide Show button for a folder that contains images at root level >> just because it is not of type "Pictures and Videos" (even if I select >> only images)? >> >> Numerous networking issues also seem to be lacking in prominence: there's >> only one mention of IPv6 - but no mention of resolving the issues of IPv6 >> alonsgide IPv4 which seem to impact many users (especially those roaming >> on wireless networks) and digging out the IP address in use for a network >> adapter is just too tedious.... >> >> On the whole I like Vista, but the UI shortcomings are not mere quibbles >> to me; if I am asked what I think of Vista the answer has been "It's >> pretty good, BUT..." Speed increases, reliability enhancements, power >> reductions, etc. are incremental improvements to be welcomed but I was >> hoping for a step-change in usability that might eliminate that "BUT..." >> >> If such issues are not going to be addressed I am going to be incredibly >> disappointed... >> >> Am I labouring under a false impression? >> >> PS Brink - remember: I know all about the conspiracy now... <g> >> -- >> Julian I-Do-Stuff >> >> Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com > |
My System Specs![]() |