Vista - Diskeeper much use for Vista?

12-13-2007

I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for
travelling.
This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled defrag. I
want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with lots of
free time, say, over night non-interrupted.

In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program.
Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right?

12-13-2007

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:15:30 -0800, "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx>
wrote:

Quote:

>I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for
>travelling.
>This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled defrag. I
>want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with lots of
>free time, say, over night non-interrupted.
>
>In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program.
>Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right?

Would you please parse that last sentence? Many thanks.

12-13-2007

"Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uO%231uQbPIHA.4584@xxxxxx

Quote:

>I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for
>travelling.
> This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled
> defrag. I
> want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with lots
> of
> free time, say, over night non-interrupted.
>
> In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program.
> Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right?
>

It's been a few years for me, but it USED to be that DISKEEPER would
defrag all files AND leave all of the contiguous free space at the end of
the drive, whereas MS defrag , does defrag the FILES, but did not "put all
of the free space at the end".

12-13-2007

Vista's builtin defragment program is a step back from XP. Though it can be
scheduled to run, if you run a manual defrag there is no longer any visual
progress window.

I use Diskeeper on both my machines, the latest version, 2008, runs with a
very low priority and I never notice that it's running and my discs stay
defragmented.

--
An Engineer asks "How does it work"
A Scientists asks "Why does it work?"
A liberal arts major asks "Do you want fries with that?"

"- Bobb -" wrote:

Quote:

>
> "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uO%231uQbPIHA.4584@xxxxxx

Quote:

> >I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for
> >travelling.
> > This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled
> > defrag. I
> > want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with lots
> > of
> > free time, say, over night non-interrupted.
> >
> > In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program.
> > Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right?
> >

> It's been a few years for me, but it USED to be that DISKEEPER would
> defrag all files AND leave all of the contiguous free space at the end of
> the drive, whereas MS defrag , does defrag the FILES, but did not "put all
> of the free space at the end".
>
>

12-13-2007

From my pov, the Vista defragment program works just fine; it is automatic
and I don't either need or want the bother of watching it work or worry
about when it might need to be done.

"SLoweCSL" <SLoweCSL@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:60B3CB52-1E8B-4742-BE4F-DEDCB531DA65@xxxxxx

Quote:

> Vista's builtin defragment program is a step back from XP. Though it can
> be
> scheduled to run, if you run a manual defrag there is no longer any visual
> progress window.
>
> I use Diskeeper on both my machines, the latest version, 2008, runs with a
> very low priority and I never notice that it's running and my discs stay
> defragmented.
>
> --
> An Engineer asks "How does it work"
> A Scientists asks "Why does it work?"
> A liberal arts major asks "Do you want fries with that?"
>
>
>
> "- Bobb -" wrote:
>

Quote:

>>
>> "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:uO%231uQbPIHA.4584@xxxxxx

Quote:

>> >I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for
>> >travelling.
>> > This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled
>> > defrag. I
>> > want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with
>> > lots
>> > of
>> > free time, say, over night non-interrupted.
>> >
>> > In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program.
>> > Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right?
>> >

>> It's been a few years for me, but it USED to be that DISKEEPER would
>> defrag all files AND leave all of the contiguous free space at the end of
>> the drive, whereas MS defrag , does defrag the FILES, but did not "put
>> all
>> of the free space at the end".
>>
>>

12-14-2007

<brie@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news

cu2m390a16hg13ogdpgh5h8tev6dr1c7q@xxxxxx

Quote:

> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:15:30 -0800, "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx>
> wrote:

Quote:

>>Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right?

>
> Would you please parse that last sentence? Many thanks.

Diskeeper does not do any more than the standard defragment program in the
Windows, correct?

12-14-2007

What version of Diskeeper does it come with? Is it the latest?

Diskeeper 2008 is very good. It is better than vista's defragger
because it comes with the choice of manual/scheduled/auto defrag and
also you can apply a specific defrag mode for a specific partition or
drive. For eg. C: can be set to defrag automatically, and D manually.
You also get VSS compatibility and some other bells and whistles with DK
2008.

--
Aevin
Posted via http://ms-os.com Forum to Usenet gateway

12-13-2007	#1 (permalink)
Anthony B n/a posts	Diskeeper much use for Vista? I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for travelling. This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled defrag. I want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with lots of free time, say, over night non-interrupted. In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program. Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right?
My System Specs

12-13-2007	#2 (permalink)
brie n/a posts	Re: Diskeeper much use for Vista? On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:15:30 -0800, "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for >travelling. >This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled defrag. I >want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with lots of >free time, say, over night non-interrupted. > >In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program. >Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right? Would you please parse that last sentence? Many thanks.
My System Specs

12-13-2007	#3 (permalink)
- Bobb - n/a posts	Re: Diskeeper much use for Vista? "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:uO%231uQbPIHA.4584@xxxxxx Quote: >I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for >travelling. > This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled > defrag. I > want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with lots > of > free time, say, over night non-interrupted. > > In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program. > Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right? > It's been a few years for me, but it USED to be that DISKEEPER would defrag all files AND leave all of the contiguous free space at the end of the drive, whereas MS defrag , does defrag the FILES, but did not "put all of the free space at the end".
My System Specs

12-13-2007	#4 (permalink)
SLoweCSL n/a posts	Re: Diskeeper much use for Vista? Vista's builtin defragment program is a step back from XP. Though it can be scheduled to run, if you run a manual defrag there is no longer any visual progress window. I use Diskeeper on both my machines, the latest version, 2008, runs with a very low priority and I never notice that it's running and my discs stay defragmented. -- An Engineer asks "How does it work" A Scientists asks "Why does it work?" A liberal arts major asks "Do you want fries with that?" "- Bobb -" wrote: Quote: > > "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:uO%231uQbPIHA.4584@xxxxxx Quote: > >I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for > >travelling. > > This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled > > defrag. I > > want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with lots > > of > > free time, say, over night non-interrupted. > > > > In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program. > > Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right? > > > It's been a few years for me, but it USED to be that DISKEEPER would > defrag all files AND leave all of the contiguous free space at the end of > the drive, whereas MS defrag , does defrag the FILES, but did not "put all > of the free space at the end". > >
My System Specs

12-13-2007	#5 (permalink)
John Hanley n/a posts	Re: Diskeeper much use for Vista? From my pov, the Vista defragment program works just fine; it is automatic and I don't either need or want the bother of watching it work or worry about when it might need to be done. "SLoweCSL" <SLoweCSL@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:60B3CB52-1E8B-4742-BE4F-DEDCB531DA65@xxxxxx Quote: > Vista's builtin defragment program is a step back from XP. Though it can > be > scheduled to run, if you run a manual defrag there is no longer any visual > progress window. > > I use Diskeeper on both my machines, the latest version, 2008, runs with a > very low priority and I never notice that it's running and my discs stay > defragmented. > > -- > An Engineer asks "How does it work" > A Scientists asks "Why does it work?" > A liberal arts major asks "Do you want fries with that?" > > > > "- Bobb -" wrote: > Quote: >> >> "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:uO%231uQbPIHA.4584@xxxxxx Quote: >> >I got this new Thinkpad X61 laptop with Vista 32 Home Basic mainly for >> >travelling. >> > This system comes with Diskeeper. But I disable all the scheduled >> > defrag. I >> > want the system to defrag ONLY want I have the system at home, with >> > lots >> > of >> > free time, say, over night non-interrupted. >> > >> > In this case, should I just use the Vista build in defrag program. >> > Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right? >> > >> It's been a few years for me, but it USED to be that DISKEEPER would >> defrag all files AND leave all of the contiguous free space at the end of >> the drive, whereas MS defrag , does defrag the FILES, but did not "put >> all >> of the free space at the end". >> >>
My System Specs

12-14-2007	#6 (permalink)
Anthony B n/a posts	Re: Diskeeper much use for Vista? <brie@xxxxxx> wrote in message newscu2m390a16hg13ogdpgh5h8tev6dr1c7q@xxxxxx Quote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:15:30 -0800, "Anthony B" <no.spam@xxxxxx> > wrote: Quote: >>Diskeeper does not seems to do much extra for me, right? > > Would you please parse that last sentence? Many thanks. Diskeeper does not do any more than the standard defragment program in the Windows, correct?
My System Specs

12-14-2007	#7 (permalink)
Aevin n/a posts	Re: Diskeeper much use for Vista? What version of Diskeeper does it come with? Is it the latest? Diskeeper 2008 is very good. It is better than vista's defragger because it comes with the choice of manual/scheduled/auto defrag and also you can apply a specific defrag mode for a specific partition or drive. For eg. C: can be set to defrag automatically, and D manually. You also get VSS compatibility and some other bells and whistles with DK 2008. -- Aevin Posted via http://ms-os.com Forum to Usenet gateway
My System Specs

Similar Threads
Thread	Forum
Diskeeper much use for Vista?	Vista installation & setup
diskeeper - vista	Vista General
Diskeeper 10 for Vista	Vista General
Diskeeper 10 for Vista?	Vista General
free Diskeeper for Vista (Diskeeper 10 for beta 5384)	Vista performance & maintenance