![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| | Re: VISTA - Microsoft's Edsel "UAC does make you open to attack" should read "*DISABLING* UAC..." - JB Vista Support FAQ http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| | Re: VISTA - Microsoft's Edsel These replies have nothing to do with the beta bits, the problem is everyone is expected to throw away amost 10 years of working with the previous UI that culminated with XP. I agee with the earlier post, Longhorn at least did not mess up the UI. They could have just put the same old UI on the new code base, I would have been less stressed about this (my third install of this stuff) I don't have time for "toys" anymore or beta testing, some weiner's idea of how I should work. It would have shipped 1 year ago and your stock price would have reflected it. "Colin Barnhorst" wrote: > I agree. There are folks in here who are simply Windows shoppers and want a > quick and dirty look at the new toy. These have unwarrented expectations of > what a beta toy is like. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:u2qj3jJrGHA.4692@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > Dennis; > > That seems to be a more common theme as Vista gets more public. > > > > People need to remember Vista is Beta. > > I usually suggest to others. > > Do not install Beta anything unless you are prepared for total data loss > > and a Clean Installation of the operating system to resolve any issues. > > I realize that is extreme, but it covers the nature of Beta, not just > > Microsoft or operating systems, but Beta anything from any source. > > Anyone not prepared for those terms, is probably not ready to have a Beta > > on their computer. > > That is how I look at any Beta before installing. > > That is why Vista is on a computer with nothing of value, or at least not > > otherwise stored. > > Currently I do not trust Vista enough to use it as my main OS. > > > > It is possible the OP has a hardware configuration incapable of supporting > > Vista. > > But more than likely, if the proper details were provided to this > > newsgroup, someone could have helped resolve any issues or at least help > > determine the precise cause. > > But to do any of that, details are necessary, details not provided. > > > > -- > > Jupiter Jones [MVP] > > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar > > http://www.dts-l.org > > > > > > "Dennis Pack x64, v64B2 (5384), OPP2007B2" <dennispack@nospamhotmail.com> > > wrote in message > > news:01730691-D391-4B43-8D6C-61DED605EDC2@microsoft.com... > >> Jupiter: > >> It looks like another one that expected everything to work out of > >> the box and expects full fixes without giving any specifications or > >> patterns. > > > > > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Microsoft's executives were amazed at how bad Vista was. | Vista General | |||
| Vista Microsoft's Failure! | General Discussion | |||
| Vista equals Edsel? | Vista General | |||
| Vista Support/ What is Microsoft's Policy? | Vista General | |||
| Vista SR and Microsoft's Excel | Vista General | |||