I concur. It sounds very likely that the XP installation has a problem. I
recently defaulted my dual boot machine back to XP because, although my
Vista installation is rock solid reliable, XP is soooooooooo much faster.
--
" non flammable" <34433@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4777c900$1@xxxxxx-privat.org...
> your observations are faulty, probably due to some driver problem on your
> XP installation
>
> XP outperforms Vista hands down on every test I could throw at it
> and similar results have been found by many people...
>
> your XP install has something wrong with it... that's the only explanation
> because Vista is slow
> as a big fat pig
>
>
>
> "Ex-COC" <fakename@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:E6Pdj.35180$_m.16275@xxxxxx
>>
>> I have an Asus with AMD DC 4.2GHZ, 5 SATA II drives and am testing Vista
>> on another partition. Some observations from comparing Vista and XP:
>>
>>
>> 1. I have some folders with over 220GB of MP3s. XP Explorer choked when
>> trying to do a detailed view on the contents so I use Opus when in XP.
>> Vista could handle it without any problem.
>>
>> 2. Copying a full 4.7GB DVD of image files from DVD to HD took around 40
>> minutes in XP. Vista could do it in less than 13 minutes.
>>
>> 3. Adding files in Media Player 11 took about 30 minutes in XP. the same
>> folders took around eight minutes in Vista.
>>
>> 4. I have about 300 videos in Media Player. Vista got thumbnails for all
>> in the first pass. XP is still working on it after a hundred openings.
>>
>> 5. Media Player also performs a lot better under Vista. the album JPGs
>> come up so much faster.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>