Vista - Microsoft seeks patent for office 'spy' software

http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/...cle3193480.ece

ss.

HUH?

It's a link to a seemingly reputable news source. It's an article of
interest to some (many?) who read this group.

What's your beef? It's not like this is another of those crappy blogslop ad
generators.


" db ´¯`·.. ><)))º>` .. ." <databaseben.public.newsgroup.microsoft.com>
wrote in message news:OkeFgfGWIHA.1164@xxxxxx

"sgopus" <sgopus@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7B656DFB-C4F7-4451-90CD-83AA28EAD7ED@xxxxxxObviously, you must be the newbie, goober.

SS has been contributing to this forum a long time
and has helped more users than you ever will.


-Michael

So what your saying, is unless you've established yourself as a honored
member in your eyes, nobody can state an opinion?? sorry but the last time I
checked this was a free country, an opinion is just that, and your entitled
to yours.

My response was directed at those who persist in posting spam, not
specifically this post, but take it as you want.

"MICHAEL" wrote:

That's not what I said at all, dolt.

Since SS has been posting here awhile,
I would be more open to giving him the
benefit of the doubt. IMO, what he posted
was not spam. It's really that simple.

It's funny you get your panties all stuck up
in your rectum talking about "a free country".
but, it was you who first attacked/labeled
SS's post. If it was actually spam, all you or
others do when replying to it with "spam",
is bring that post more attention. That post
probably had been forgotten about and passed
over until you decided to "label" it. Thus, a post
with no replies, gets 12.... because you brought it
to more folks attention. That's what usually happens
when do-gooders decide to label a post as spam.

Do you understand, goober?


-Michael

"sgopus" <sgopus@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BE8CC76C-7266-4FEB-8A74-181D60151A45@xxxxxx