I agree. I much prefer top posting ... after an hour or so of reading, I get
tired and start skipping bottom posts ...



.... vanilla


"Richard Eagle" <Richard@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OkSMgj5ZIHA.4272@xxxxxx

> On most groups, yes it would be quite rare, and it will never happen on
> this
> group. Top posting only is the way we do it on our own private groups, and
> especially in a thread with so many replies/levels, top replies are much
> easier and faster.
>
> Richard
>
>
> "Terry R." <F1ComNOSPAM@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:u8v3RU1ZIHA.5784@xxxxxx
> The date and time was 2/3/2008 4:56 AM, and on a whim, Richard Eagle
> pounded out on the keyboard:
>

>> In one thread on one of our groups we had 434 replies and some at least
>> 12 levels deep, and all replies were of course top posted. Are you saying
>> that it would have been easier to follow/read that thread if we had all
>> bottom posted our replies? It's a simple yes or no question. I say no.
>> What say you?
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>

>
>
> It is quite simple. No. It is quite rare when EVERYONE will top post
> or EVERYONE will bottom post.
>
> --
> Terry R.
>
> ***Reply Note***
> Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
> Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Same here....really some make a "one and only true religion" out of their views on ng posting.

Charlie

"vanilla" <vanilla@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:OT5y5OJaIHA.4440@xxxxxx

>I agree. I much prefer top posting ... after an hour or so of reading, I get
> tired and start skipping bottom posts ...
>
> ... vanilla
>
>
> "Richard Eagle" <Richard@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OkSMgj5ZIHA.4272@xxxxxx

>> On most groups, yes it would be quite rare, and it will never happen on
>> this
>> group. Top posting only is the way we do it on our own private groups, and
>> especially in a thread with so many replies/levels, top replies are much
>> easier and faster.
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> "Terry R." <F1ComNOSPAM@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:u8v3RU1ZIHA.5784@xxxxxx
>> The date and time was 2/3/2008 4:56 AM, and on a whim, Richard Eagle
>> pounded out on the keyboard:
>>

>>> In one thread on one of our groups we had 434 replies and some at least
>>> 12 levels deep, and all replies were of course top posted. Are you saying
>>> that it would have been easier to follow/read that thread if we had all
>>> bottom posted our replies? It's a simple yes or no question. I say no.
>>> What say you?
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>

>>
>>
>> It is quite simple. No. It is quite rare when EVERYONE will top post
>> or EVERYONE will bottom post.
>>
>> --
>> Terry R.
>>
>> ***Reply Note***
>> Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
>> Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

>