![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | WinVista faster? I currently own WinXP pro 64bit and when I saw all the commercials on the Windows site, I was persuaded that it was an upgrade to make, an improvement. When I installed winVista 64bit I was excited since everything looked nicer.. "BUT" here's the catch of my problems... I installed my ATI 64bit compatible Vista drivers and Creative soundcard and rebooted, then I installed SuperAntispyware (wich I usualy have) and rebooted again.. I noticed that my pc did not boot faster as claimed, but a tad slower.. I ran my games and most of them ran sluggish, showing glitches all over my screen (dots like what you see when looking at a very old damaged movie). My PC seemed to be slower overall and when I ran my spyware program, it seemed windows has infinite spyware, like a virus that reinstalls itself when removed. I had my spyware scanner attempt to remove the spyware over the night but when I looked at my pc, it was totally ruined.. It was even more slower and all the special effects had gone so I was forced to reinstall WinXP. I have a friend with exactly the same problem and both of us own an original copy of WinVista. Can someone help me with WHY WindowsVista might work awfully crappy on my system compared to WindowsXPpro? Perhaps Vista requires specific hardware to NOT be slower? My current system config = AMD Athlon X2 4800+ 64bit Kingston 4GB DDR2 PC3200 /800 Asus A8R32-MVP DELUXE ATI 1900XTX 512MB x2 Crossfire Philips 22" monitor Creative SB Fatal1ty Xtremegamer Creative inspire 7.1 speakers Raptor 74GB & 140GB harddrives 10K (SATA) OZC power supply 700W 4x DVD Writer 48x read 24x R 8x RW |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: WinVista faster? '' "SXTC" <SXTC@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:50E0D019-FFE9-48AF-BCFA-EEDEA0F8B89D@xxxxxx Quote: > I currently own WinXP pro 64bit and when I saw all the commercials on the > Windows site, I was persuaded that it was an upgrade to make, an Quote: > When I installed winVista 64bit I was excited since everything looked > nicer.. "BUT" here's the catch of my problems... I installed my ATI 64bit > compatible Vista drivers and Creative soundcard and rebooted, then I > installed SuperAntispyware (wich I usualy have) and rebooted again.. I > noticed that my pc did not boot faster as claimed, but a tad slower.. I Quote: > my games and most of them ran sluggish, showing glitches all over my Quote: > (dots like what you see when looking at a very old damaged movie). My PC > seemed to be slower overall and when I ran my spyware program, it seemed > windows has infinite spyware, like a virus that reinstalls itself when > removed. I had my spyware scanner attempt to remove the spyware over the > night but when I looked at my pc, it was totally ruined.. It was even more > slower and all the special effects had gone so I was forced to reinstall > WinXP. I have a friend with exactly the same problem and both of us own an > original copy of WinVista. > Can someone help me with WHY WindowsVista might work awfully crappy on my > system compared to WindowsXPpro? > Perhaps Vista requires specific hardware to NOT be slower? > > My current system config = > > AMD Athlon X2 4800+ 64bit > Kingston 4GB DDR2 PC3200 /800 > Asus A8R32-MVP DELUXE > ATI 1900XTX 512MB x2 Crossfire > Philips 22" monitor > Creative SB Fatal1ty Xtremegamer > Creative inspire 7.1 speakers > Raptor 74GB & 140GB harddrives 10K (SATA) > OZC power supply 700W > 4x DVD Writer 48x read 24x R 8x RW Vista takes more resources than XP so why would you expect it to be faster? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | RE: WinVista faster? "SXTC" wrote: Quote: > > then I installed SuperAntispyware (wich I usualy have) and rebooted again.. > which slows down Vista |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: WinVista faster? As philo says it takes more resources. That said I use SuperAntiSpyware on Vista Ultimate 64 and it never finds anything except tracking cookies on a full scan. Ever think you do have a virus. "SXTC" <SXTC@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:50E0D019-FFE9-48AF-BCFA-EEDEA0F8B89D@xxxxxx Quote: >I currently own WinXP pro 64bit and when I saw all the commercials on the > Windows site, I was persuaded that it was an upgrade to make, an > improvement. > When I installed winVista 64bit I was excited since everything looked > nicer.. "BUT" here's the catch of my problems... I installed my ATI 64bit > compatible Vista drivers and Creative soundcard and rebooted, then I > installed SuperAntispyware (wich I usualy have) and rebooted again.. I > noticed that my pc did not boot faster as claimed, but a tad slower.. I > ran > my games and most of them ran sluggish, showing glitches all over my > screen > (dots like what you see when looking at a very old damaged movie). My PC > seemed to be slower overall and when I ran my spyware program, it seemed > windows has infinite spyware, like a virus that reinstalls itself when > removed. I had my spyware scanner attempt to remove the spyware over the > night but when I looked at my pc, it was totally ruined.. It was even more > slower and all the special effects had gone so I was forced to reinstall > WinXP. I have a friend with exactly the same problem and both of us own an > original copy of WinVista. > Can someone help me with WHY WindowsVista might work awfully crappy on my > system compared to WindowsXPpro? > Perhaps Vista requires specific hardware to NOT be slower? > > My current system config = > > AMD Athlon X2 4800+ 64bit > Kingston 4GB DDR2 PC3200 /800 > Asus A8R32-MVP DELUXE > ATI 1900XTX 512MB x2 Crossfire > Philips 22" monitor > Creative SB Fatal1ty Xtremegamer > Creative inspire 7.1 speakers > Raptor 74GB & 140GB harddrives 10K (SATA) > OZC power supply 700W > 4x DVD Writer 48x read 24x R 8x RW |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: WinVista faster? "SXTC" <SXTC@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:50E0D019-FFE9-48AF-BCFA-EEDEA0F8B89D@xxxxxx Quote: >I currently own WinXP pro 64bit and when I saw all the commercials on the > Windows site, Quote: > I noticed that my pc did not boot faster as claimed, but a tad slower.. a commercial that made false claims? oh my... so, what did we learn today? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Windows 7 RC | Re: WinVista faster? "SXTC" <SXTC@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:50E0D019-FFE9-48AF-BCFA-EEDEA0F8B89D@xxxxxx Quote: >I currently own WinXP pro 64bit and when I saw all the commercials on the > Windows site, Quote: > I noticed that my pc did not boot faster as claimed, but a tad slower.. a commercial that made false claims? oh my... so, what did we learn today? I hope this helps. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: WinVista faster? I've test driven Vista for over a year now I've given it good tires a nice clear road I've read the owners manual Just as fast if not faster ![]() Rich |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| WinVista file selection bug | Vista file management | |||
| Help with msg.exe in winvista!! | Vista General | |||
| Free ASPI driver for WinVista 32bit and maybe WinVista 64bit | Drivers | |||
| WMP Toolbar in WinVista Enterprise | Vista General | |||
| WinVista GPO log on Script odd behavior | Vista account administration | |||