![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Using Vista x64.... need a solution for my problem Hi. I know this question has been asked here "atleast 3 times a week * number of weeks this newsgroup was in action" as said by someone.... but this is strange.... I have 6 GB of RAM installed. System properties says 6.0GB installed, but actually only 5374 MB ram is available to Windows.... Checked using Start-> type winver in search and press enter.... in the bottom it shows 5,503,160KB available to windows. I am using vista ultimate x64, Memory hole remap is enabled in the BIOS. BIOS shows 6144 MB during post. Memtest 86 also recognizes 6144 MB and tests all of it. My board is Maximus formula, CPU - Core 2 Extreme QX9650, 6 GB RAM installed, 8800GT 512 MB PCI E card. More info.... under HKLM in registry->hardware->resource map->system resources->physical memory, I checked the address range of the instaled memory, it is as follows PHYSICAL ADDRESS START 0x100000 Length: CFE80000 Start: 0x0000000100000000 Length: 80000000 These are HEX values, open calculator, in scientific mode, select HEX enter CFE80000 and add 80000000 and then press DEC.... now divide by 1024 twice... u will get the amount of RAM that is mapped in MB. it shows 5374.5 MB. DEP is enabled, Memory Remap feature is enabled in BIOS. I tried manually editing the Registry values for devices, jus adding FFFFFFFF to the value in Binary, which will make the values 00000001xxxxxxxx so that Devices are mapped from 8.0 GB and downwards, but when I restarted, all the settings turned back to original values in registry too. I am not able to remap the resources using device manager, on the resources TAP even after enabling PCIPnP OS. Wonder how I know so much things to do regarding registry n stuff? well, I am jus saying I know my stuff. Why this problem in Vista? I am using SP1. I jus dont want my OS to show 6 GB RAM but use jus 5374 MB as it is happening now. What is the problem here? with x64 too? and all my hardware is x64 Compatible. Got any solutions or even Ideas to try? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Using Vista x64.... need a solution for my problem "broken_ninja" <broken_ninja@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:F9E0FBB2-07CC-490F-AEBB-F60A17214451@xxxxxx Quote: > Hi. > > I know this question has been asked here "atleast 3 times a week * number > of > weeks this newsgroup was in action" as said by someone.... but this is > strange.... > > I have 6 GB of RAM installed. System properties says 6.0GB installed, but > actually only 5374 MB ram is available to Windows.... > > Checked using Start-> type winver in search and press enter.... in the > bottom it shows 5,503,160KB available to windows. > > I am using vista ultimate x64, Memory hole remap is enabled in the BIOS. > BIOS shows 6144 MB during post. Memtest 86 also recognizes 6144 MB and > tests > all of it. 4 GB so you can use 4 GB RAM. But it still has to appear SOMEWHERE in the memory space. Most current 64 bit motherboards have an 8 GB address space. It looks like the memory remap setting moves your PCI reserved space to just beyond 4 GB. Some move it to the TOP of the 8 GB space, so you wouldn't see this issue until you install 8 GB RAM. There is nothing you can do about this. Any OS would see the exact same memory map. This is not a Windows problem, and there is no solution. Put in 2 more GB (8 GB) and you will have 7374 MB of useable RAM. Until motherboards have an address space of 256 GB or more and remap the PCI address space WAY UP HIGH, this will continue to be a problem. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Using Vista x64.... need a solution for my problem "Canuck57" <dave-no.spam4me@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:5KBFj.109531$w94.86504@xxxxxx Quote: > He should see, and be able to use 6GB without any issues, or so the theory > goes. Quote: > To me, it sounds like Vista has remapped memory in just under 4GB and not > up just under 8GB. Quote: > BTW, I have 8GB and windows recognizes it ALL. Home Premium x84 even. > All 8,386,892 KB of it as available to Windows. It might be mapping > memory, or maybe I am just lucky with the extra address bits and it sits > up at 16GB or something. hope your "x84" above is x64 - if it's x86 you are not using 8 GB of RAM. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Using Vista x64.... need a solution for my problem "Canuck57" <dave-no.spam4me@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:EVCFj.111467$pM4.80323@xxxxxx Quote: > My x84 is really Vista Premium x86. Not sure about it being premium. RAM. It is physically impossible for 32 bit Vista to use more than this, regardless of your MB or BIOS or what you do or what it is reporting. Vista 32 with SP1 will report all of your RAM, but it still will not USE it. Quote: > Not all mapping is BIOS, Vista has a part as does video. UMA Video...can > dynamically grab RAM - does that show as usable or get hidden and used? available to Vista. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Using Vista x64.... need a solution for my problem "Canuck57" <dave-no.spam4me@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:cgDFj.111918$pM4.39169@xxxxxx Quote: > Forget me, brain is on hold today. Vista Premium x64 (as in 64 bits). to use more than about 3.3 GB or RAM. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Using Vista x64.... need a solution for my problem If i had 8 GB and my mobo addresses 8 GB only, I can understand why i wud get only 7374 MB ram. but the issue here is, vista x64 has not remapped the resources for devices to the 8GB space, it is still at the 4GB and downwards space, as a result it is gobbling up my RAM. "Bob Campbell" wrote: Quote: > "Canuck57" <dave-no.spam4me@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:EVCFj.111467$pM4.80323@xxxxxx Quote: > > My x84 is really Vista Premium x86. Not sure about it being premium. > Then you are not using 8 GB of RAM. Vista 32 is limited to about 3.3 GB of > RAM. It is physically impossible for 32 bit Vista to use more than this, > regardless of your MB or BIOS or what you do or what it is reporting. > Vista 32 with SP1 will report all of your RAM, but it still will not USE it. > Quote: > > Not all mapping is BIOS, Vista has a part as does video. UMA Video...can > > dynamically grab RAM - does that show as usable or get hidden and used? > MB video ram isn't "remapped", it is simply used for video, and will not be > available to Vista. > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Using Vista x64.... need a solution for my problem I already have Fedora, which I was using on this same system before My vista came in the mail. Then I scrapped Fedora out.... Fedora worked fine and also detected and used all the 6 GB of RAM. OpenSUSE 10.3 also agreed with fedora. This is a problem with Vista I am sure, as u can see in my first post, the registry values and the values in resources tab of every device in devicemanager also shows that the Hex values of memory mapped lies from 4 GB and downwards, what shall I do? Do you agree that this problem is with Vista? "Canuck57" wrote: Quote: > > "broken_ninja" <brokenninja@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:EF2ABD2C-E42D-4B14-BDEA-896721646837@xxxxxx Quote: > > If i had 8 GB and my mobo addresses 8 GB only, I can understand why i wud > > get > > only 7374 MB ram. but the issue here is, vista x64 has not remapped the > > resources for devices to the 8GB space, it is still at the 4GB and > > downwards > > space, as a result it is gobbling up my RAM. > > > > "Bob Campbell" wrote: > Go to http://software.opensuse.org/ and download the live version and make a > CD of it. The live version will allow you to test the ystems and see how > much RAM Linux can see/use. Make sure you get the live version, it is meant > to run from the CD/DVD. You do not want to install until your sure you > want to scrap Vista. > > Quote: Quote: > >> "Canuck57" <dave-no.spam4me@xxxxxx> wrote in message > >> news:EVCFj.111467$pM4.80323@xxxxxx > >> > My x84 is really Vista Premium x86. Not sure about it being premium. > >> > >> Then you are not using 8 GB of RAM. Vista 32 is limited to about 3.3 GB > >> of > >> RAM. It is physically impossible for 32 bit Vista to use more than > >> this, > >> regardless of your MB or BIOS or what you do or what it is reporting. > >> Vista 32 with SP1 will report all of your RAM, but it still will not USE > >> it. > >> > >> > Not all mapping is BIOS, Vista has a part as does video. UMA > >> > Video...can > >> > dynamically grab RAM - does that show as usable or get hidden and used? > >> > >> MB video ram isn't "remapped", it is simply used for video, and will not > >> be > >> available to Vista. > >> > >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Anyone yet discovered a solution to the Vista scheduler problem? | Vista General | |||
| Vista to XP lan games problem: THE SOLUTION | Vista Games | |||
| Solution to WMP 11 problem in Vista | General Discussion | |||
| Possible Solution To Vista Problem | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Solution to Vista Sleep Problem | Vista General | |||