Ram is not the real problem, its resources. There is a difference, believe
me. You can have lots of free ram but the performance of the computer may be
very low, and its not CPU either. Its a combination with handles & threads.
| Quote: |  | |
|
>Firefox is typically over 200MB for me
| |
| | |
so you are seeing the known Firefox memory leak and you are so used to vista
bloat that you think this is normal??? LOL!!!
This is a known flaw of firefox 2.0!!! (that mozilla isnt too vocal about
.... hehe)
Try FF 3.0 beta 4 portable test edition from portableapps.com
"Chupacabra" <chupa@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23qtDwaPkIHA.5396@xxxxxx
| Quote: | | |
|
>
>
> "orange" <Or@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:47ed193e$1@xxxxxx-privat.org...
> | Quote: | | | |
>> I installed it on XP and to my terror, all the processes (4 of them!!!!)
>> together use up more than 70 of ram!!!.. lol
| | | | | >
> Your terror? 70MB of RAM? Jesus Tapdancing Christ, 70MB is nothing these
> days. Firefox is typically over 200MB for me. 70MB out of 2,000MB is
> hardly worth worrying about. Certainly not enough to terrorize anyone! | |
| | |
03-28-2008
Similar Threads 
Linear Mode
