Vista Tutorial - Windows Experience Index

I'm surprised. My index rating actually went up from beta 2. I now have a
3.3 instead of a 3.0
Beta 2:
CPU: 3.1
RAM: 3.0
HD: 3.7
GPU RAM: 4.3
GPU: 5.9
RC1:
CPU: 3.3
RAM: 4.0
HD: 5.0
GPU RAM: 4.6
GPU: 4.5 (lower than beta 2)

Yes because of OEM complaints!

--

Take Care,

Will


"Travis King" <Anonymous@none.com> wrote in message
news:ePkKeh%23yGHA.4396@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> I'm surprised. My index rating actually went up from beta 2. I now have
> a 3.3 instead of a 3.0
> Beta 2:
> CPU: 3.1
> RAM: 3.0
> HD: 3.7
> GPU RAM: 4.3
> GPU: 5.9
> RC1:
> CPU: 3.3
> RAM: 4.0
> HD: 5.0
> GPU RAM: 4.6
> GPU: 4.5 (lower than beta 2)

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:57:02 -0500, "Travis King" <Anonymous@none.com>
wrote:

>I'm surprised. My index rating actually went up from beta 2. I now have a
>3.3 instead of a 3.0
>Beta 2:
>CPU: 3.1
>RAM: 3.0
>HD: 3.7
>GPU RAM: 4.3
>GPU: 5.9
>RC1:
>CPU: 3.3
>RAM: 4.0
>HD: 5.0
>GPU RAM: 4.6
>GPU: 4.5 (lower than beta 2)
I made a 2.0 (was 1)
My lowly FX5200 gets a 2.0
but what is weird is it gets a 2.5 as a Gaming Graphics????
My Primary HD rates a 5.2. Huh!
I'll bite, which drive is "Primary" as I have a NON-Standard
configuration. The 2 drives are identical models, BUT the Vista drive
(F is on the standard EISE motherboard channel and my XPpro drive
(C is a broken Mirror, on a Si680 Raid Controller.

The "Learn more about Scores" link just takes me to the Microsoft
Company Portal.