Vista - Installing VISTA on a Production Machine

I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
distribution.

I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a spare
hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?

If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it reach out
and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?

Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with Windows 2000
installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install VISTA on the spare hard
drive, but swapping hard drives a couple times a day would be a pain.

Todd

Its rough decision, and Vista is still rough around edges. Installing Vista
in a dual boot configuration should pose no problems though, recommendation
would be to launch setup from within Windows 2000, instead of booting from
the disk. Select the N: partition during setup and it should install without
any problems.

I still find it risky using Vista on my production machine, thats why I
"always backup my data" before doing any installation. Make sure you check
that drive for any errors before installing.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta

"Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
news:eF%23g6lagGHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
> distribution.
>
> I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a spare
> hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
>
> If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it reach out
> and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
>
> Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with Windows 2000
> installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install VISTA on the spare
> hard
> drive, but swapping hard drives a couple times a day would be a pain.
>
> Todd
>
>

Thanks Andre

I thought of something else after I posted.

My desktop (Windows 2000 Pro) is on a LAN with my wife's desktop (Windows XP
home), and our laptop (Windows XP Pro). The two desktops are cabled to the
router and the laptop is wi-fi. Would they be at risk?

My wife's computer has a relatively big hard drive which is where I put the
back-ups from my desktop.

Todd

"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OqxUmragGHA.5096@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Its rough decision, and Vista is still rough around edges. Installing
Vista
> in a dual boot configuration should pose no problems though,
recommendation
> would be to launch setup from within Windows 2000, instead of booting from
> the disk. Select the N: partition during setup and it should install
without
> any problems.
>
> I still find it risky using Vista on my production machine, thats why I
> "always backup my data" before doing any installation. Make sure you check
> that drive for any errors before installing.
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>
> "Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:eF%23g6lagGHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> >I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
> > distribution.
> >
> > I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a
spare
> > hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
> >
> > If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it reach
out
> > and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
> >
> > Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with Windows
2000
> > installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install VISTA on the spare
> > hard
> > drive, but swapping hard drives a couple times a day would be a pain.
> >
> > Todd
> >
> >
>
>

Todd wrote:
> I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
> distribution.
>
> I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a spare
> hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
>
> If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it reach out
> and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
>
> Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with Windows 2000
> installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install VISTA on the spare hard
> drive, but swapping hard drives a couple times a day would be a pain.
>

Another possibility would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with W2K
installed, connect the spare HDD and install Win Vista on the spare
HDD, and afterwards connect both HDDs and switch between the W2K disk
and the the Win Vista disk in the BIOS boot setting.

(That's what I did/do with WinXP on a 120.0 GB disk and with Win98SE
on a 1.1 GB disk - just for fun;-)

Roy

No, it won't affect the other desktops. Is the Windows 2000 Pro machine a
Gateway to the Internet for the other machines? If so, make sure you back up
any necessary settings before installing, just in case (God forbids)
anything goes wrong. As Todd mentioned, you will get a new bootloader on C
that will be permanent unless you format and reinstall Windows 2000 or XP on
that system, but its not a problem. You can use VistaBootPRO to manage and
edit the Windows Vista Boot Manager and make specific entries your default
OS on boot up.

http://www.vistabootpro.org/
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta

"Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
news:urxo%23ObgGHA.5104@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Andre
>
> I thought of something else after I posted.
>
> My desktop (Windows 2000 Pro) is on a LAN with my wife's desktop (Windows
> XP
> home), and our laptop (Windows XP Pro). The two desktops are cabled to
> the
> router and the laptop is wi-fi. Would they be at risk?
>
> My wife's computer has a relatively big hard drive which is where I put
> the
> back-ups from my desktop.
>
> Todd
>
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OqxUmragGHA.5096@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Its rough decision, and Vista is still rough around edges. Installing
> Vista
>> in a dual boot configuration should pose no problems though,
> recommendation
>> would be to launch setup from within Windows 2000, instead of booting
>> from
>> the disk. Select the N: partition during setup and it should install
> without
>> any problems.
>>
>> I still find it risky using Vista on my production machine, thats why I
>> "always backup my data" before doing any installation. Make sure you
>> check
>> that drive for any errors before installing.
>> --
>> --
>> Andre
>> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>
>> "Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:eF%23g6lagGHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> >I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
>> > distribution.
>> >
>> > I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a
> spare
>> > hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
>> >
>> > If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it reach
> out
>> > and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
>> >
>> > Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with Windows
> 2000
>> > installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install VISTA on the spare
>> > hard
>> > drive, but swapping hard drives a couple times a day would be a pain.
>> >
>> > Todd
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

"Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in
news:eF#g6lagGHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
> distribution.
>
> I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a
> spare hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
>
> If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it
> reach out and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
>
> Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with
> Windows 2000 installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install
> VISTA on the spare hard drive, but swapping hard drives a couple
> times a day would be a pain.
>
> Todd
>
>

Vista will put its own boot loader on the C:\ drive. If you decide you
no longer want Vista, you can either just live with having a foreign boot
loader or try to restore the XP boot loader (and run the risk of messing
something up). Back up!

You can also use another boot loader program. I use BootIt NG and it works
fine.

When you install Vista it will rewrite the MBR and load the Vista boot
loader. When I am finished installing Vista I re-activate BootIt and have my
original boot loader back, listing all 8 operating systems I use.

Norm
"darius" <noone@here.invalid> wrote in message
news:44138120846.8554256396.38864@msnews.microsoft.com...
> "Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in
> news:eF#g6lagGHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
>> I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
>> distribution.
>>
>> I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a
>> spare hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
>>
>> If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it
>> reach out and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
>>
>> Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with
>> Windows 2000 installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install
>> VISTA on the spare hard drive, but swapping hard drives a couple
>> times a day would be a pain.
>>
>> Todd
>>
>>
>
> Vista will put its own boot loader on the C:\ drive. If you decide you
> no longer want Vista, you can either just live with having a foreign boot
> loader or try to restore the XP boot loader (and run the risk of messing
> something up). Back up!

Just be aware that no one is going to encourage you to do this. Microsoft
does not give online or phone support for recovering from disasters caused
by mounting and operating a beta operating system on your computer.

Multibooting with Vista is different from multibooting with earlier editions
of Windows.

I suggest that you buy a large capacity external hard drive and back up your
production machine on it. That way you have your system backed up to medium
completely outside the machine and can recover from a disaster more easily.

Murphy was a beta tester.

"Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
news:eF%23g6lagGHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
> distribution.
>
> I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a spare
> hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
>
> If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it reach out
> and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
>
> Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with Windows 2000
> installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install VISTA on the spare
> hard
> drive, but swapping hard drives a couple times a day would be a pain.
>
> Todd
>
>

VistaBootPro is the classic example of why Microsoft should do a GUI version
of BCDedit and why those of us who have been screaming about the need for it
were 100% right.

"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uJOvIvbgGHA.1520@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> No, it won't affect the other desktops. Is the Windows 2000 Pro machine a
> Gateway to the Internet for the other machines? If so, make sure you back
> up any necessary settings before installing, just in case (God forbids)
> anything goes wrong. As Todd mentioned, you will get a new bootloader on C
> that will be permanent unless you format and reinstall Windows 2000 or XP
> on that system, but its not a problem. You can use VistaBootPRO to manage
> and edit the Windows Vista Boot Manager and make specific entries your
> default OS on boot up.
>
> http://www.vistabootpro.org/
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>
> "Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:urxo%23ObgGHA.5104@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks Andre
>>
>> I thought of something else after I posted.
>>
>> My desktop (Windows 2000 Pro) is on a LAN with my wife's desktop (Windows
>> XP
>> home), and our laptop (Windows XP Pro). The two desktops are cabled to
>> the
>> router and the laptop is wi-fi. Would they be at risk?
>>
>> My wife's computer has a relatively big hard drive which is where I put
>> the
>> back-ups from my desktop.
>>
>> Todd
>>
>> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:OqxUmragGHA.5096@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Its rough decision, and Vista is still rough around edges. Installing
>> Vista
>>> in a dual boot configuration should pose no problems though,
>> recommendation
>>> would be to launch setup from within Windows 2000, instead of booting
>>> from
>>> the disk. Select the N: partition during setup and it should install
>> without
>>> any problems.
>>>
>>> I still find it risky using Vista on my production machine, thats why I
>>> "always backup my data" before doing any installation. Make sure you
>>> check
>>> that drive for any errors before installing.
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Andre
>>> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
>>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>>
>>> "Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:eF%23g6lagGHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> >I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
>>> > distribution.
>>> >
>>> > I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a
>> spare
>>> > hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
>>> >
>>> > If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it reach
>> out
>>> > and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
>>> >
>>> > Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with Windows
>> 2000
>>> > installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install VISTA on the
>>> > spare
>>> > hard
>>> > drive, but swapping hard drives a couple times a day would be a pain.
>>> >
>>> > Todd
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

I hoping they just license it and include it in the final version.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta

"Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst(remove)@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%23Y8vV6cgGHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> VistaBootPro is the classic example of why Microsoft should do a GUI
> version of BCDedit and why those of us who have been screaming about the
> need for it were 100% right.
>
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uJOvIvbgGHA.1520@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> No, it won't affect the other desktops. Is the Windows 2000 Pro machine a
>> Gateway to the Internet for the other machines? If so, make sure you back
>> up any necessary settings before installing, just in case (God forbids)
>> anything goes wrong. As Todd mentioned, you will get a new bootloader on
>> C that will be permanent unless you format and reinstall Windows 2000 or
>> XP on that system, but its not a problem. You can use VistaBootPRO to
>> manage and edit the Windows Vista Boot Manager and make specific entries
>> your default OS on boot up.
>>
>> http://www.vistabootpro.org/
>> --
>> --
>> Andre
>> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>
>> "Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:urxo%23ObgGHA.5104@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> Thanks Andre
>>>
>>> I thought of something else after I posted.
>>>
>>> My desktop (Windows 2000 Pro) is on a LAN with my wife's desktop
>>> (Windows XP
>>> home), and our laptop (Windows XP Pro). The two desktops are cabled to
>>> the
>>> router and the laptop is wi-fi. Would they be at risk?
>>>
>>> My wife's computer has a relatively big hard drive which is where I put
>>> the
>>> back-ups from my desktop.
>>>
>>> Todd
>>>
>>> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:OqxUmragGHA.5096@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> Its rough decision, and Vista is still rough around edges. Installing
>>> Vista
>>>> in a dual boot configuration should pose no problems though,
>>> recommendation
>>>> would be to launch setup from within Windows 2000, instead of booting
>>>> from
>>>> the disk. Select the N: partition during setup and it should install
>>> without
>>>> any problems.
>>>>
>>>> I still find it risky using Vista on my production machine, thats why I
>>>> "always backup my data" before doing any installation. Make sure you
>>>> check
>>>> that drive for any errors before installing.
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Andre
>>>> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
>>>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>>>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>>>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>>>
>>>> "Todd" <Noname@NoSpam.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:eF%23g6lagGHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> >I am not a member of MSDN or Technet, so I am waiting for the public
>>>> > distribution.
>>>> >
>>>> > I don't have a machine that I can dedicate to VISTA, but I do have a
>>> spare
>>>> > hard drive. Just how evil and dangerous is VISTA?
>>>> >
>>>> > If I install it multi-boot on its own hard drive (N:\), will it reach
>>> out
>>>> > and corrupt Windows 2000 on the C:\ drive?
>>>> >
>>>> > Another alternative would be to disconnect the C:\ drive with Windows
>>> 2000
>>>> > installed, connect the spare hard drive, and install VISTA on the
>>>> > spare
>>>> > hard
>>>> > drive, but swapping hard drives a couple times a day would be a pain.
>>>> >
>>>> > Todd
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>