Vista - Vista RC1 is great!

"Ted F" <tfrankfourth@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3GINg.1830$vW4.693@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>I have been playing around with Vista Build 5532 - to - Vista Build RC1
>5600.
>
> At first, it was a little painful with both builds, but, I got it to work.
> There are a few minor bugs but, I bet when the retail version is released
> some to all problems will be fixed. Most software(s) out there does not
> work with Vista, I've had tried many and many. The devices I'm using are
> all compatible with Vista, maybe that why I'm not having that any
> problems.
>
> As for the manufacturers developing device drivers for Vista, there a bit
> too slow releasing beta drivers to test the devices in the beta versions
> of Vista. I guess I'll wait for the finale releases of the device drivers,
> because just like Windows XP first release we all had to wait for bug
> fixes in the drivers for the devices to work correctly.
>
> ~BRAVO!! MICROSOFT!!~
But Windows Mail takes muct too long to load compared to Outlook Express in
XP.

I have been playing around with Vista Build 5532 - to - Vista Build RC1
5600.

At first, it was a little painful with both builds, but, I got it to work.
There are a few minor bugs but, I bet when the retail version is released
some to all problems will be fixed. Most software(s) out there does not work
with Vista, I've had tried many and many. The devices I'm using are all
compatible with Vista, maybe that why I'm not having that any problems.

As for the manufacturers developing device drivers for Vista, there a bit
too slow releasing beta drivers to test the devices in the beta versions of
Vista. I guess I'll wait for the finale releases of the device drivers,
because just like Windows XP first release we all had to wait for bug fixes
in the drivers for the devices to work correctly.

~BRAVO!! MICROSOFT!!~

In mine, Windows Mail runs super FAST! ...Way better then Outlook Express.


"Boomer" <Boomerlake@aol.com> wrote in message
news:et6vCtt1GHA.328@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> "Ted F" <tfrankfourth@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:3GINg.1830$vW4.693@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>>I have been playing around with Vista Build 5532 - to - Vista Build RC1
>>5600.
>>
>> At first, it was a little painful with both builds, but, I got it to
>> work. There are a few minor bugs but, I bet when the retail version is
>> released some to all problems will be fixed. Most software(s) out there
>> does not work with Vista, I've had tried many and many. The devices I'm
>> using are all compatible with Vista, maybe that why I'm not having that
>> any problems.
>>
>> As for the manufacturers developing device drivers for Vista, there a bit
>> too slow releasing beta drivers to test the devices in the beta versions
>> of Vista. I guess I'll wait for the finale releases of the device
>> drivers, because just like Windows XP first release we all had to wait
>> for bug fixes in the drivers for the devices to work correctly.
>>
>> ~BRAVO!! MICROSOFT!!~
> But Windows Mail takes muct too long to load compared to Outlook Express
> in XP.
>

I second that. It runs very fast. No problems with it so far.

--
Jason

Windows Vista RC1 Build 5600
MS Office 2007 Beta 2
"Ted F" <tfrankfourth@wi.rr.com> wrote in message news:tAKNg.1852$vW4.1466@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
In mine, Windows Mail runs super FAST! ...Way better then Outlook Express.


"Boomer" <Boomerlake@aol.com> wrote in message
news:et6vCtt1GHA.328@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> "Ted F" <tfrankfourth@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:3GINg.1830$vW4.693@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>>I have been playing around with Vista Build 5532 - to - Vista Build RC1
>>5600.
>>
>> At first, it was a little painful with both builds, but, I got it to
>> work. There are a few minor bugs but, I bet when the retail version is
>> released some to all problems will be fixed. Most software(s) out there
>> does not work with Vista, I've had tried many and many. The devices I'm
>> using are all compatible with Vista, maybe that why I'm not having that
>> any problems.
>>
>> As for the manufacturers developing device drivers for Vista, there a bit
>> too slow releasing beta drivers to test the devices in the beta versions
>> of Vista. I guess I'll wait for the finale releases of the device
>> drivers, because just like Windows XP first release we all had to wait
>> for bug fixes in the drivers for the devices to work correctly.
>>
>> ~BRAVO!! MICROSOFT!!~
> But Windows Mail takes muct too long to load compared to Outlook Express
> in XP.
>

Would be a heckofa lot more impressive if it would see my backed up IE6
messages. DBXpress may do it (haven't tried it yet), but it shouldn't be
necessary to use a third-party program to import messages from one MS
program to another.


"Ted F" <tfrankfourth@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
news:tAKNg.1852$vW4.1466@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> In mine, Windows Mail runs super FAST! ...Way better then Outlook Express.
>
>
> "Boomer" <Boomerlake@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:et6vCtt1GHA.328@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>
>> "Ted F" <tfrankfourth@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:3GINg.1830$vW4.693@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>>>I have been playing around with Vista Build 5532 - to - Vista Build RC1
>>>5600.
>>>
>>> At first, it was a little painful with both builds, but, I got it to
>>> work. There are a few minor bugs but, I bet when the retail version is
>>> released some to all problems will be fixed. Most software(s) out there
>>> does not work with Vista, I've had tried many and many. The devices I'm
>>> using are all compatible with Vista, maybe that why I'm not having that
>>> any problems.
>>>
>>> As for the manufacturers developing device drivers for Vista, there a
>>> bit too slow releasing beta drivers to test the devices in the beta
>>> versions of Vista. I guess I'll wait for the finale releases of the
>>> device drivers, because just like Windows XP first release we all had to
>>> wait for bug fixes in the drivers for the devices to work correctly.
>>>
>>> ~BRAVO!! MICROSOFT!!~
>> But Windows Mail takes muct too long to load compared to Outlook Express
>> in XP.
>>
>
>