|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Welcome to Vista Forums we are your forum for Windows Vista help and discussion. Whether you need help or just want to post an idea you have on Vista, this is the forum for you.
 |
| |||||||
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-04-2008
| #11 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: 32bits or 64 "Steph" <steph@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:bBNrk.29828$hx.26436@xxxxxx
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
My System Specs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
09-04-2008
| #12 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: 32bits or 64 "Brian W" <brian.wescombeSODOFF@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:6KOvk.189922$_M4.77199@xxxxxx
-- Don | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| My System Specs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
09-04-2008
| #13 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: 32bits or 64 "Don" <burnettedclothes@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:2E61B31E-E021-44F9-A4F2-F9D27DD7CF92@xxxxxx
In 40 years of computing, I have seen a lot of changes. But Vista gets my vote for worst design. The way it looks and feels, I thought it was AOL 10... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| My System Specs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
09-04-2008
| #14 (permalink) |
| Member   Rep Power: 13  |  Re: 32bits or 64 I love Vista and have to disagree with you NotEvenMe. Vista is a very well built OS. It is stable as heck and hardly ever crashes and is very reliable with very few issues. I think it looks fantastic and is very easy to use even for the basic users. As for the OP I would go with the 32bit version just to make your life easier. Finding the right drivers for the more basic user is not something you might want to deal with. If you find a computer that already has 64 bit Vista installed I would go with that, but the choice is yours! |
| My System Specs |
|
09-06-2008
| #15 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
| Guest | Re: 32bits or 64 Everyone has their preferences. I'm glad you like it. Maybe I don't like it because it was designed for 'basic users'. It looks like they changed a lot of things just to say it is different. Personally, I have to see a benefit to accept a change as necessary. I don't see anything that Vista can do that the previous version couldn't. They claim improved security, but I never had an issue with that on previous versions. The 'protect me from myself' mentality just irritates me. "Adamd" <guest@xxxxxx-email.com> wrote in message news:eaea714961ce3b537657e34c927a0b89@xxxxxx-gateway.com...
| ||||||||||||
| My System Specs | |||||||||||||
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| fonts don't show in games (vista 32bits) | Kusanagi_san | General Discussion | 3 | 12-14-2007 08:15 PM |
| 4Gb Support under Vista 32Bits | François KREBS | Vista General | 2 | 09-17-2007 07:58 AM |
| 32bits v. 64bits | Zygy | Vista General | 4 | 04-22-2007 12:36 PM |
| Internet explorer 32bits | Jose Carlos Gómez | Vista General | 1 | 04-15-2007 06:36 AM |
| How I can activate windows Vista beta 2 32bits? | BB | Vista installation & setup | 3 | 07-16-2006 03:05 PM |
| Complimentary Industry Resources Vista Forums has joined forces with TradePub.com to offer you a new, exciting, and entirely free professional resource. Visit http://vistax64.tradepub.com today to browse our selection of complimentary Industry magazines, white papers, webinars, podcasts, and more across 34 industry sectors. No credit cards, coupons, or promo codes required. Try it today! |
Linear Mode
