![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just another vista. Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got! UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned something from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via] http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects "I came from distant star" <starail@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:49344182$1@xxxxxx-privat.org... Quote: > More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just > another vista. > Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts > name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got! > Now go back |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects You don't even know how to use Vista so how can you say anything about Windows 7 now? Windows 7 won't be out till late 2009 or 2010. You are just pissed because Vista is way over your head. "I came from distant star" <starail@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:49344182$1@xxxxxx-privat.org... Quote: > More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just > another vista. > Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts > name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got! > > UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which lets > any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop transparency > and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D requirements for video > games. Microsoft seems to have learned something from the "Vista > Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion on what can "run" > the OS due out in mid-2009. [via] > > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects "I came from distant star" <starail@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:49344182$1@xxxxxx-privat.org... Yeah, the one near Stupider. Quote: > More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just another > vista. WinMel-98-95? Was Win95 another Win3.11? You haven't even tried Windows 7 yet, actually, you know nothing about Windows 7. Quote: > Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts name.. > and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got! Quote: > UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which lets any > computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop transparency and, with > a certain performance hit, the Direct3D requirements for video games. Microsoft > seems to have learned something from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, > so expect less confusion on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via] > > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects - Vista Cabal |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects "I came from distant star" <starail@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:49344182$1@xxxxxx-privat.org... Quote: > More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just > another vista. > Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts > name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got! > > UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which lets > any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop transparency > and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D requirements for video > games. Microsoft seems to have learned something from the "Vista > Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion on what can "run" > the OS due out in mid-2009. [via] > > Quote: > Sounds good, and as soon as they get it down to not needing a motherboard, cpu, harddrive, RAM and monitor... I'll probably run right out and get it! |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects "I came from distant star" <starail@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:49344182$1@xxxxxx-privat.org... Quote: > UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which lets > any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop transparency > and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D requirements for video > games. but "Windows 7" will run perfect and fast on it, complete with advanced graphics! I'm guessing that the next revelation - by some equally obscure "PC magazine" in Katmandu - will be that when you fart in front of any "Windows 7" machine with a 3.5" floppy drive, a little hand will come out of the floppy drive slot and wave it away. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects you are fighting with spanky de monkey ! now that's a first.. I thought you low forehead, protruding brow, primate trolls supported each other... lol "FBonWin7x32" <fb@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:gh1hj0$eb0$3@xxxxxx Quote: > I came from a distant bar wrote: Quote: >> You don't even know how to use Vista so how can you say anything about >> Windows 7 now? Windows 7 won't be out till late 2009 or 2010. You are >> just pissed because Vista is way over your head. > > Projecting again huh? > Get some help...mental help. You're out of control...take your meds. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects "Bob Campbell" <bob@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:fuWdnW4ti4mjzanUnZ2dnUVZ_qLinZ2d@xxxxxx Quote: > "I came from distant star" <starail@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:49344182$1@xxxxxx-privat.org... Quote: >> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which >> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop >> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D >> requirements for video games. > What a load of baloney. You can't even *install* Vista on an 800 MHz > CPU, but "Windows 7" will run perfect and fast on it, complete with > advanced graphics! > > I'm guessing that the next revelation - by some equally obscure "PC > magazine" in Katmandu - will be that when you fart in front of any > "Windows 7" machine with a 3.5" floppy drive, a little hand will come out > of the floppy drive slot and wave it away. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is based on. http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html Radically different view. and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the Microsoft PDC a number of weeks ago see https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx -- Mike Brannigan "I came from distant star" <starail@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:49344182$1@xxxxxx-privat.org... Quote: > More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just > another vista. > Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts > name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got! > > UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which lets > any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop transparency > and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D requirements for video > games. Microsoft seems to have learned something from the "Vista > Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion on what can "run" > the OS due out in mid-2009. [via] > > http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 Won't Require Graphics Hardware for Effects WTF??? YOU IDIOT!!! lol I give the source towards the location I find this information.. right below the text on my POST! http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects If you want to be your crappy self and complain, go complain to lifehacker! although I must point out, that since you live vista, you are stupid and they will just reject you as a retard! lol "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:817088E9-640A-4FCF-9647-CB2DD875DA44@xxxxxx Quote: > Maybe you should read the real artcile that your work of fiction is based > on. > http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/60527...n-the-cpu.html > Radically different view. > and to known more go watch the presentation in PC05 give at the Microsoft > PDC a number of weeks ago > see > https://sessions.microsoftpdc.com/public/timeline.aspx > > -- > Mike Brannigan > > "I came from distant star" <starail@xxxxxx> wrote in message > news:49344182$1@xxxxxx-privat.org... Quote: >> More reasons why windows7 will be far better than vista, and not just >> another vista. >> Some people just understand the extent of damage vista did to Microsofts >> name.. and why they are trying to correct this with everything they got! >> >> UK magazine Custom PC reports that Windows 7 will feature WARP, which >> lets any computer with an 800MHz processor run Aero-style desktop >> transparency and, with a certain performance hit, the Direct3D >> requirements for video games. Microsoft seems to have learned something >> from the "Vista Capable/Ready" labeling fiasco, so expect less confusion >> on what can "run" the OS due out in mid-2009. [via] >> >> http://lifehacker.com/5100278/window...re-for-effects |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Restart adversely effects graphics driver.... | Drivers | |||
| Does this sound like a Graphics card hardware error? | Vista hardware & devices | |||
| Possible to detect prohibited graphics hardware acceleration | Vista hardware & devices | |||
| Does pre-installed Windows Vista require activation? | Vista General | |||