Not Even Me wrote:
> "B. Smith" <bsmith@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:ghcmlo$6k1$1@xxxxxx
>> "Vista AKA the Pig with Lipstick" <a@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> Cause they are incompetent ?
>>> that's why the IT people from the 150 biggest corporations of USA advize
>>> against using vista.
>> leaders of corporations aren't highly reguarded right now.
>> Neither are you, teenie weenie.
>> Go to bed, young man.
> No, there simply isn't enough advantage in using Vista to justify the time
> and expense of implementing it.
> Especially when 80% of users say, why did you do THAT to me??!!??
Exactly so, XP is working fine on the hardware they have and Vista would
be a double expense for many people. It is not just the hardware for
graphics etc, but lack of drivers for things like network hardware.
Whilst much of this is not Microsoft's fault it is still a factor and an
Add to this the cost of re-educating users because things got "Switched
around" and you have a problem you don't need. Had there been some kind
of "Looks just like XP" user interface option things might have gone a
lot different, although networking compatibility would still have been
Unfortunately there are still many who have stick up notes saying "Press
this, click on that" and don't really understand the underlying actions
behind their normal job activity, anyone having to do user support would
be inundated. Again, not Microsoft's fault per-se, but still an issue.