Vista comparison

Anyone know of a good link where all the Vista versions are broken down by
comparison in features (64 bit, 32 bit, Aero, etc)??

Thanks

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvist...s/default.mspx

There is no difference feature-wise between the x64 and x86 versions.

--
Jane, not plain 64 bit enabled
Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation :-)
"Ryan" <Ryan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:33738FFC-3580-487B-A2A8-86965D138661@microsoft.com...
> Anyone know of a good link where all the Vista versions are broken down by
> comparison in features (64 bit, 32 bit, Aero, etc)??
>
> Thanks

Kinda contrasts with your sig, doesn't it :-)

"Jane C" <jellybean@nospam.xjgarage.org> wrote in message
news:66323D76-21BD-4959-A62B-AC3ACA3B08AF@microsoft.com...
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvist...s/default.mspx
>
> There is no difference feature-wise between the x64 and x86 versions.
>
> --
> Jane, not plain 64 bit enabled
> Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation :-)
> "Ryan" <Ryan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:33738FFC-3580-487B-A2A8-86965D138661@microsoft.com...
>> Anyone know of a good link where all the Vista versions are broken down
>> by
>> comparison in features (64 bit, 32 bit, Aero, etc)??
>>
>> Thanks
>

What does? The feature set is the same between x86 and x64, the differences
are in the processing power behind the x64 engine.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"PowerUser" <a@b.com> wrote in message
news:ugm3sN64GHA.1492@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Kinda contrasts with your sig, doesn't it :-)
>
> "Jane C" <jellybean@nospam.xjgarage.org> wrote in message
> news:66323D76-21BD-4959-A62B-AC3ACA3B08AF@microsoft.com...
>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvist...s/default.mspx
>>
>> There is no difference feature-wise between the x64 and x86 versions.
>>
>> --
>> Jane, not plain 64 bit enabled
>> Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation :-)
>> "Ryan" <Ryan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:33738FFC-3580-487B-A2A8-86965D138661@microsoft.com...
>>> Anyone know of a good link where all the Vista versions are broken down
>>> by
>>> comparison in features (64 bit, 32 bit, Aero, etc)??
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>
>

So sad to explain humor. I meant her statement contrasted with her
attesting 64 bit 'not plain' in her signature.

You must have some super spam blocking software- A real non munged Email
address!

"Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:usXXuB74GHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> What does? The feature set is the same between x86 and x64, the
> differences are in the processing power behind the x64 engine.
>
> --
> Best of Luck,
>
> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>
> "PowerUser" <a@b.com> wrote in message
> news:ugm3sN64GHA.1492@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Kinda contrasts with your sig, doesn't it :-)
>>
>> "Jane C" <jellybean@nospam.xjgarage.org> wrote in message
>> news:66323D76-21BD-4959-A62B-AC3ACA3B08AF@microsoft.com...
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvist...s/default.mspx
>>>
>>> There is no difference feature-wise between the x64 and x86 versions.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jane, not plain 64 bit enabled
>>> Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation :-)
>>> "Ryan" <Ryan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:33738FFC-3580-487B-A2A8-86965D138661@microsoft.com...
>>>> Anyone know of a good link where all the Vista versions are broken down
>>>> by
>>>> comparison in features (64 bit, 32 bit, Aero, etc)??
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>>
>

Been non-munged for many, many years, and there's plenty of spam and lots of
filters. If I had a nickel for every bit of spam - no wait, then I'd be Bill
G. <g>

I knew it was intended to be humor, I just couldn't figure out what part of
Jane's sig you were commenting on. Somedays the brain just ain't fully
functional.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"PowerUser" <a@b.com> wrote in message
news:uPAyBe74GHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> So sad to explain humor. I meant her statement contrasted with her
> attesting 64 bit 'not plain' in her signature.
>
> You must have some super spam blocking software- A real non munged Email
> address!
>
> "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:usXXuB74GHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> What does? The feature set is the same between x86 and x64, the
>> differences are in the processing power behind the x64 engine.
>>
>> --
>> Best of Luck,
>>
>> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
>> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>>
>> "PowerUser" <a@b.com> wrote in message
>> news:ugm3sN64GHA.1492@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> Kinda contrasts with your sig, doesn't it :-)
>>>
>>> "Jane C" <jellybean@nospam.xjgarage.org> wrote in message
>>> news:66323D76-21BD-4959-A62B-AC3ACA3B08AF@microsoft.com...
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvist...s/default.mspx
>>>>
>>>> There is no difference feature-wise between the x64 and x86 versions.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jane, not plain 64 bit enabled
>>>> Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation :-)
>>>> "Ryan" <Ryan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:33738FFC-3580-487B-A2A8-86965D138661@microsoft.com...
>>>>> Anyone know of a good link where all the Vista versions are broken
>>>>> down by
>>>>> comparison in features (64 bit, 32 bit, Aero, etc)??
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Rick Rogers wrote:
> Been non-munged for many, many years, and there's plenty of spam and
> lots of filters. If I had a nickel for every bit of spam - no wait, then
> I'd be Bill G. <g>
>
> I knew it was intended to be humor, I just couldn't figure out what part
> of Jane's sig you were commenting on. Somedays the brain just ain't
> fully functional.
>

I know what you mean Rick. I just wanted to say hello from 98 general
newsgroup land where you used to visit and post. I currently am using a
tri-boot system with 98SE for old legacy Windows 3.1 and DOS programs,
XP Professional for current programs and Vista for testing. I used to
post under Art when he was a house mate I would use his computer with
Outlook Express.

>I currently am using a tri-boot system with 98SE for old legacy Windows 3.1
>and DOS programs,

I just have to ask ... Why?
Unless you have a really old and slow machine, I can't think of a single
reason to use Windows 3.1

-- Andy

"Andyistic" <android2@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:JKidnQqk0dmpF73YnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@adelphia.com...
> >I currently am using a tri-boot system with 98SE for old legacy Windows
> >3.1 and DOS programs,
>
> I just have to ask ... Why?
> Unless you have a really old and slow machine, I can't think of a single
> reason to use Windows 3.1
>
> -- Andy
>
>
>
>

very old dos based programs perhaps

You read wrong- He's using 98, XP and Vista. Windows 3.1 is not one of
them.


"Andyistic" <android2@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:JKidnQqk0dmpF73YnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@adelphia.com...
> >I currently am using a tri-boot system with 98SE for old legacy Windows
> >3.1 and DOS programs,
>
> I just have to ask ... Why?
> Unless you have a really old and slow machine, I can't think of a single
> reason to use Windows 3.1
>
> -- Andy
>
>
>
>