Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista General

Vista - Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

Reply
 
Old 12-28-2008   #1 (permalink)
weewillie


 
 

Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

Earlier today I transfered c 150 files, 1.5gb from Vista to a usb2
drive and it took an hour
When I then transfered those same files from the usb stick to xp it
took 2 mins
Why is Vista so incredibly slow at file transfers?

using 2gb mem and 2 ghz on vista business laptop
and 1 gb mem 1 ghz on xp


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #2 (permalink)


Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Beta, Vista Ultimate x86
 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

Quote  Quote: Originally Posted by weewillie View Post
Earlier today I transfered c 150 files, 1.5gb from Vista to a usb2
drive and it took an hour
When I then transfered those same files from the usb stick to xp it
took 2 mins
Why is Vista so incredibly slow at file transfers?

using 2gb mem and 2 ghz on vista business laptop
and 1 gb mem 1 ghz on xp
weewillie, when you find out, let me know. SP2 was supposed to fix this, but I haven't noticed a huge improvement since installing the beta. I do know it is because Vista handles files differently than XP, but what is different, I don't know

Norm
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #3 (permalink)
DanS


 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

weewillie@xxxxxx wrote in news:i5igl4ld6lb1prj4goh4a1833kqj5h05dm@
4ax.com:
Quote:

> Earlier today I transfered c 150 files, 1.5gb from Vista to a usb2
> drive and it took an hour
> When I then transfered those same files from the usb stick to xp it
> took 2 mins
> Why is Vista so incredibly slow at file transfers?
>
> using 2gb mem and 2 ghz on vista business laptop
> and 1 gb mem 1 ghz on xp
>
Some have solved the slow network problem by disabling the on-board NIC and
replacing it with an inexpensive Vista-compatible PCI NIC....for a desktop.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #4 (permalink)
john


 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?


"DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9B835121A2F10thisnthatroadrunnern@xxxxxx
Quote:

> weewillie@xxxxxx wrote in news:i5igl4ld6lb1prj4goh4a1833kqj5h05dm@
> 4ax.com:
>
Quote:

>> Earlier today I transfered c 150 files, 1.5gb from Vista to a usb2
>> drive and it took an hour
>> When I then transfered those same files from the usb stick to xp it
>> took 2 mins
>> Why is Vista so incredibly slow at file transfers?
>>
>> using 2gb mem and 2 ghz on vista business laptop
>> and 1 gb mem 1 ghz on xp
>>
>
> Some have solved the slow network problem by disabling the on-board NIC
> and
> replacing it with an inexpensive Vista-compatible PCI NIC....for a
> desktop.
that assumes the problem is with a piece of hardware.
it isn't, the problem is Vista...


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #5 (permalink)
DanS


 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

"john" <john@xxxxxx> wrote in news:eluplnbaJHA.5488
@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:
Quote:

> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Xns9B835121A2F10thisnthatroadrunnern@xxxxxx
Quote:

>> weewillie@xxxxxx wrote in news:i5igl4ld6lb1prj4goh4a1833kqj5h05dm@
>> 4ax.com:
>>
Quote:

>>> Earlier today I transfered c 150 files, 1.5gb from Vista to a usb2
>>> drive and it took an hour
>>> When I then transfered those same files from the usb stick to xp it
>>> took 2 mins
>>> Why is Vista so incredibly slow at file transfers?
>>>
>>> using 2gb mem and 2 ghz on vista business laptop
>>> and 1 gb mem 1 ghz on xp
>>>
>>
>> Some have solved the slow network problem by disabling the on-board
NIC
Quote:
Quote:

>> and
>> replacing it with an inexpensive Vista-compatible PCI NIC....for a
>> desktop.
>
> that assumes the problem is with a piece of hardware.
No, it doesn't.
Quote:

> it isn't, the problem is Vista...
Yes, an interaction between Vista and a piece of hardware. Dumping the
on-board NIC results in a totally different NIC, connected in a different
fashion, and with different drivers.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #6 (permalink)
Fritz


 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

"DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9B835A72723F4thisnthatroadrunnern@xxxxxx
Quote:

> "john" <john@xxxxxx> wrote in news:eluplnbaJHA.5488
> @TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl:
>
Quote:

>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9B835121A2F10thisnthatroadrunnern@xxxxxx
Quote:

>>> weewillie@xxxxxx wrote in news:i5igl4ld6lb1prj4goh4a1833kqj5h05dm@
>>> 4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> Earlier today I transfered c 150 files, 1.5gb from Vista to a usb2
>>>> drive and it took an hour
>>>> When I then transfered those same files from the usb stick to xp it
>>>> took 2 mins
>>>> Why is Vista so incredibly slow at file transfers?
>>>>
>>>> using 2gb mem and 2 ghz on vista business laptop
>>>> and 1 gb mem 1 ghz on xp
>>>>
>>>
>>> Some have solved the slow network problem by disabling the on-board
> NIC
Quote:
Quote:

>>> and
>>> replacing it with an inexpensive Vista-compatible PCI NIC....for a
>>> desktop.
>>
>> that assumes the problem is with a piece of hardware.
>
> No, it doesn't.
>
Quote:

>> it isn't, the problem is Vista...
>
> Yes, an interaction between Vista and a piece of hardware. Dumping the
> on-board NIC results in a totally different NIC, connected in a different
> fashion, and with different drivers.
How is replacing a network card going to change the speed of file transfer
over a USB connection? It won't. The network card is not being used. This
isn't a network problem. It is a Vista problem.


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #7 (permalink)
Bob Campbell


 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

<weewillie@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i5igl4ld6lb1prj4goh4a1833kqj5h05dm@xxxxxx
Quote:

> Earlier today I transfered c 150 files, 1.5gb from Vista to a usb2
> drive and it took an hour
> When I then transfered those same files from the usb stick to xp it
> took 2 mins
> Why is Vista so incredibly slow at file transfers?
>
> using 2gb mem and 2 ghz on vista business laptop
> and 1 gb mem 1 ghz on xp
>

Probably because you are *writing* to the USB in Vista, then just *reading*
from it in XP. Flash RAM is slower at writing than reading. Try it the
other direction and see what happens.

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #8 (permalink)
Alex Clayton


 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

"Bob Campbell" <bob@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dOSdnUp25Zk0lMTUnZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@xxxxxx
Quote:

>
> Probably because you are *writing* to the USB in Vista, then just
> *reading* from it in XP. Flash RAM is slower at writing than reading.
> Try it the other direction and see what happens.
>
That's not the reason, it is Vista. This is one of the things covered in the
book Vista Annoyances , but I don't feel like digging the book out to see
how they explained it. You see it when you use any kind of removable media
to move stuff. Even with my MP3 players my XP machines are WAY faster than
this Vista one. It's just one of the things I have learned to live with till
the next OS comes out.
--
"Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites.
Moderation is for monks."

[Lazarus Long]

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #9 (permalink)
+Bob+


 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:39:26 -0800, "Alex Clayton"
<alexx1400@xxxxxx> wrote:
Quote:

>That's not the reason, it is Vista. This is one of the things covered in the
>book Vista Annoyances , but I don't feel like digging the book out to see
>how they explained it. You see it when you use any kind of removable media
>to move stuff. Even with my MP3 players my XP machines are WAY faster than
>this Vista one. It's just one of the things I have learned to live with till
>the next OS comes out.
No, no, no, it CAN'T be Vista! Vista has no problems! Just ask the fan
boys around here.
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 12-29-2008   #10 (permalink)
Charles Tomaras


 
 

Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?


"+Bob+" <nomailplease@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7rbil4lvn6p23tkfqr15nakvqm6ivere2m@xxxxxx
Quote:

> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:39:26 -0800, "Alex Clayton"
> <alexx1400@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
Quote:

>>That's not the reason, it is Vista. This is one of the things covered in
>>the
>>book Vista Annoyances , but I don't feel like digging the book out to see
>>how they explained it. You see it when you use any kind of removable media
>>to move stuff. Even with my MP3 players my XP machines are WAY faster than
>>this Vista one. It's just one of the things I have learned to live with
>>till
>>the next OS comes out.
>
> No, no, no, it CAN'T be Vista! Vista has no problems! Just ask the fan
> boys around here.
You don't seem to understand, Vista moves the files more thoroughly....which
takes longer!


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Slow hard drive access times, gets slower with time! General Discussion
Documenting how screwed up Vista REALLY is with file transfering Vista General
Vista Copy Speed over the network is slower that XP SP2 and OSX..much slower? Vista General
Vista Copy Speed over the network is slower that XP SP2 and OSX..much slower? Vista networking & sharing
Vista machine getting slower and slower everyday Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46