On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:53:46 -0700, Bruce Chambers
<bchambers@xxxxxx> wrote:
>Susan wrote:
>> All for Vista 64-bit Ultimate:
>>
>> 1.) I've had a third falling out over 25 or so years with
>> Symantec/Norton and am looking for a Registry search tool where you can
>> search for a particular 'word' much as you do now but where it will list
>> all the finds, review ones you want to delete, uncheck ones you want to
>> keep and finally make it so (delete them). Doing this one at at time is
>> such a waste of time--hundreds of occurrences of 'Symantec' and I still
>> have 'Norton', 'Ghost', and '360' to purge out of the Registry. (BTW,
>> Norton's removal tool hardly touched Registry entries, left empty
>> Windows Explorer folders, and was not product selective--did they even
>> think of the Registry?) This time around I would rather find a manual
>> way to scrubbing the Registry but also a tool that will seek out
>> orphaned key remnants too!
>> > This is not a snake-oil cleaner, but a scanner that's more powerful
>than Regedit's built-in search toll:
>
>RegScanner v1.51
>Copyright (c) 2004 - 2007 Nir Sofer
>Web Site: http://www.nirsoft.net Thank you Bruce. I actually used the program to remove three or
four-hundred separate string entries in the Registry. My searches
were 'Symantec', 'Norton 360', and 'Norton Ghost'. That still leave
around one-hundred entries that kept spawning back...some returning
even after a reboot. This morning I looked through the Taskbar and
Start Menu Properties | Notification Area and checked the Hide
inactive icons to see what was there. I found 'Symantec Email
Scanner', 'Norton Ghost Status: Backed Up', and 'Norton 360 is
protecting you.'
Do you know how I can get rid of these last remnants--how to keep the
Registry entries from respawning?
It seems to me that this is extremely poor programming on Symantec's
part--crude and rude--and it leads to no wonder that XP and Vista get
toasted sooner or later via this 'untouchable' Registry. But, since I
am not a programmer although I was familiar with BASIC and Fortran
years ago, maybe you or someone can explain how writing all this code
into the Registry was the right way and the fact that Symantec's
special removal tool not removing these entries was the right way?
Another programming practice I don't understand why is making the
deletion of some files so incredibly bulletproof. A most recent
example here is Webroot's Security suite that writes 108 or so files
under the directory 'wrstemp' in the Windows\Temp directory. I've
always thought that Windows\Temp and \Tmp were _temporary_ directories
where everything in them can be deleted and the worst that can happen
is you have to reboot the computer. These particular files that
amount to some 61.5 or so MB so far can only be removed if you
uninstall Webroot Security. If they are permanent in nature even if
their contents/data varies then don't they belong elsewhere--such as a
Webroot Security program file directory?
Lastly, why is it meaningless to need to or desire to shrink up the
Registry free space, especially if you remove some 500 lines in it? Is
it possible that Vista, unlike XP, does this automatically when
RegEdit is closed? I've never looked to see--interesting. Registry
Scanner worked well. Is there a reliable Registry compaction program
to go with it?
Anyone? Thank you.