![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | TweakUI vs TweakVI TweakUi basic is a valuable utility. More elegant than TweakUI - but some of the functions of TweakUI are not available in TweakVI Basic. Although the latter is far more complete. My opinion is both should be installed. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI Both are extremely good at doing what they were designed for; however you cannot install both on the same system. TweakUI is for Windows XP and will not install on Windows Vista. TweakVI, on the other hand, is only suitable for Vista. -- John Barnett MVP Windows XP Associate Expert Windows Desktop Experience Web: http://www.winuser.co.uk Web: http://www.silversurfer-guide.com Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy, reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this mail/post.. "cqui3" <cqui3@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:u5jIpmXeJHA.4040@xxxxxx Quote: > TweakUi basic is a valuable utility. > More elegant than TweakUI - but > some of the functions of TweakUI > are not available in TweakVI Basic. > Although the latter is far more complete. > > My opinion is both should be installed. > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI I keeep repeating that IT WORKS with Vista and Win7. TweakUi 1.33 that is. See my message with subject title "TweakUI vs TweakVI (IT WORKS) - which I reposted yesterday. "John Barnett MVP" <freelance@xxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:e99h2rYeJHA.1532@xxxxxx Quote: > Both are extremely good at doing what they were designed for; however you > cannot install both on the same system. TweakUI is for Windows XP and will > not install on Windows Vista. TweakVI, on the other hand, is only suitable > for Vista. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI Correction. Message subject to look for is "Using TweakUI in Vista (IT WORKS)" "cqui3" <cqui3@xxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:urlANRaeJHA.3776@xxxxxx Quote: > > > I keeep repeating that IT WORKS with Vista and Win7. > TweakUi 1.33 that is. > See my message with subject title "TweakUI vs TweakVI (IT WORKS) - > which I reposted yesterday. > > > "John Barnett MVP" <freelance@xxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de > news:e99h2rYeJHA.1532@xxxxxx Quote: >> Both are extremely good at doing what they were designed for; however you >> cannot install both on the same system. TweakUI is for Windows XP and >> will not install on Windows Vista. TweakVI, on the other hand, is only >> suitable for Vista. >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:36:47 -0000, "John Barnett MVP" <freelance@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Both are extremely good at doing what they were designed for; however you >cannot install both on the same system. TweakUI is for Windows XP and will >not install on Windows Vista. > Snip .................... something else - I am about to find out!! -- ---------------- Stubbo of Oz ---------------- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:26:40 -0500, "Rick Rogers" <rick@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Not all the settings changes it has may work as intended. Some of the >intended keys are now protected by sets of permissions. -- ---------------- Stubbo of Oz ---------------- |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI Stubbo of Oz wrote: Quote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:36:47 -0000, "John Barnett MVP" > <freelance@xxxxxx> wrote: > Quote: >> Both are extremely good at doing what they were designed for; however you >> cannot install both on the same system. TweakUI is for Windows XP and will >> not install on Windows Vista. >> Snip .................... > TweakUI 1.33 installed OK on my Vista. Whether it works properly is > something else - I am about to find out!! > http://www.winvistaclub.com/Ultimate...s_Tweaker.html |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI "Eric Tiberius Duckman" <eric_t_duckman@xxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:ri38n4tvuno4h1grpa3c5movov5to374tf@xxxxxx On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:03:09 +1100, Stubbo of Oz <stubbo@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:36:47 -0000, "John Barnett MVP" ><freelance@xxxxxx> wrote: > Quote: >>Both are extremely good at doing what they were designed for; however you >>cannot install both on the same system. TweakUI is for Windows XP and will >>not install on Windows Vista. >> Snip .................... >TweakUI 1.33 installed OK on my Vista. Whether it works properly is >something else - I am about to find out!! one icon at random from the desktop and overlaying it in the bottom left corner of every icon on the desktop, where the shortcut arrow icon would usually be! They stayed that way even after I uninstalled it, and I had to edit the registry to return the desktop to normal. I used the one at majorgeeks.com that cqui3 posted a link for in message <uA8gJ9FeJHA.4492@xxxxxx>. Good luck, hope it works better for you. -- "...Amusing, yet not without a certain understated omniscience" It did work better for me. And I have been using it for months now - perhaps over a year. I wonder if your problem really came from TwekUI. At the time I recommended it in a Microsoft newsgroup several users found it worked well. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI It would not work for me on a Dell Vostro 220 with Windows Vista Basic preinstalled. But then I am suspicious of Dell pre-installations. "cqui3" <cqui3@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:ea$pSRjeJHA.1336@xxxxxx Quote: > > "Eric Tiberius Duckman" <eric_t_duckman@xxxxxx> a écrit dans le message > de news:ri38n4tvuno4h1grpa3c5movov5to374tf@xxxxxx > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:03:09 +1100, Stubbo of Oz > <stubbo@xxxxxx> wrote: > Quote: >>On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:36:47 -0000, "John Barnett MVP" >><freelance@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Quote: >>>Both are extremely good at doing what they were designed for; however you >>>cannot install both on the same system. TweakUI is for Windows XP and >>>will >>>not install on Windows Vista. >>> Snip .................... >>TweakUI 1.33 installed OK on my Vista. Whether it works properly is >>something else - I am about to find out!! > I tried it, and it mucked up my desktop icons, by apparently taking > one icon at random from the desktop and overlaying it in the bottom > left corner of every icon on the desktop, where the shortcut arrow > icon would usually be! They stayed that way even after I uninstalled > it, and I had to edit the registry to return the desktop to normal. > > I used the one at majorgeeks.com that cqui3 posted a link for in > message <uA8gJ9FeJHA.4492@xxxxxx>. > > Good luck, hope it works better for you. > -- > "...Amusing, yet not without a certain understated omniscience" > > > It did work better for me. And I have been using it for months now - > perhaps over a year. I wonder if your problem really came from > TwekUI. > At the time I recommended it in a Microsoft newsgroup several users > found it worked well. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: TweakUI vs TweakVI "Eric Tiberius Duckman" <eric_t_duckman@xxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:f6s9n49gkpbl04jud9k4m74jtiglc38rba@xxxxxx On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:49:01 -0500, "cqui3" <cqui3@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: Quote: >>"Eric Tiberius Duckman" <eric_t_duckman@xxxxxx> a écrit dans le message >>de news:ri38n4tvuno4h1grpa3c5movov5to374tf@xxxxxx >>On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:03:09 +1100, Stubbo of Oz >><stubbo@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Quote: >>>On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:36:47 -0000, "John Barnett MVP" >>><freelance@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>Both are extremely good at doing what they were designed for; however >>>>you >>>>cannot install both on the same system. TweakUI is for Windows XP and >>>>will >>>>not install on Windows Vista. >>>> Snip .................... >>> >>>TweakUI 1.33 installed OK on my Vista. Whether it works properly is >>>something else - I am about to find out!! >>I tried it, and it mucked up my desktop icons, by apparently taking >>one icon at random from the desktop and overlaying it in the bottom >>left corner of every icon on the desktop, where the shortcut arrow >>icon would usually be! They stayed that way even after I uninstalled >>it, and I had to edit the registry to return the desktop to normal. >> >>I used the one at majorgeeks.com that cqui3 posted a link for in >>message <uA8gJ9FeJHA.4492@xxxxxx>. >> >>Good luck, hope it works better for you. >It did work better for me. And I have been using it for months now - >perhaps over a year. I wonder if your problem really came from >TwekUI. >At the time I recommended it in a Microsoft newsgroup several users >found it worked well. shortcut arrows from my desktop icons when I first got my pc, so maybe that caused my problem with TweakUI. I can't remember what it was, but it didn't involve any manual registry edits. -- It can be done with a small *.reg file or manually editing the registry. If TweakUi works well on your computer you should be able to restore the arrow, or restore/or suppress «shortcut» from the name of new shortcuts. That is after you reboot. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| TweakVI | Vista General | |||
| TweakVI - have you had problems with it? | Vista General | |||
| TweakVI | Vista General | |||
| TweakVI now for both 32/64 bit Vista | Vista General | |||
| TweakVI now for both 32/64 Vista | Software | |||