Windows Vista Forums

Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory
  1. #1


    Fitz Guest

    Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory

    I'm running Vista 64 Home (SP1) Premium on a homebuilt machine
    w/8GB (4 X 2GB modules). Windows is reporting 8 GB of Installed
    Physical Memory but is reporting only 4 GB of Total Physical Memory.

    I first noticed this when, after installing a game, the game system
    specs said 3092 MB of RAM.



    I have checked the BIOS and it recognizes 8 GB. Memory Remapping
    is Enabled. Under Memory Remapping is "PCI MMIO Allocation:
    4GB to 3328 MB" (?)

    MSConfig Boot Options shows Max Memory is not checked and no
    value in the box below. I tried enabling it and using 8192 as the value,
    but it made no difference.

    DxDiag shows 8 GB installed RAM.

    Any ideas on how I can get windows to make available all 8 GB of RAM?

    (Motherboard is ASUS Maximus II Extreme w/Intel Q9550 processor running
    at Q9650 clock speed, memory running at 1127 MHz)

    Thanks,
    Fitz
    --
    Your body is a temple boy,
    You ought to treat it well
    But you trash the place and rent it out
    Like it's some cheap motel - The Badlees

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #2


    Keith H Guest

    Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory

    Fitz wrote:

    > I'm running Vista 64 Home (SP1) Premium on a homebuilt machine
    > w/8GB (4 X 2GB modules). Windows is reporting 8 GB of Installed
    > Physical Memory but is reporting only 4 GB of Total Physical Memory.
    >
    > I first noticed this when, after installing a game, the game system
    > specs said 3092 MB of RAM.
    >
    most likely the case is that the game is not 64 bit compatible.. that is, a 32
    bit application running on 64 bit Vista will see only 4GB memory, even if you
    have more than 4GB installed..

    see:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr..._windows_vista

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #3


    Fitz Guest

    Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory


    >>
    > most likely the case is that the game is not 64 bit compatible.. that
    > is, a 32 bit application running on 64 bit Vista will see only 4GB
    > memory, even if you have more than 4GB installed..
    >
    > see:
    > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr..._windows_vista
    >
    I would agree, except that Windows System information is showing 4GB Total Memory, even though
    it shows 8GB Physical Memory Installed.

    Fitz
    --
    Your body is a temple boy,
    You ought to treat it well
    But you trash the place and rent it out
    Like it's some cheap motel - The Badlees

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #4


    Keith H Guest

    Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory

    Fitz wrote:

    >

    >>>
    >> most likely the case is that the game is not 64 bit compatible.. that
    >> is, a 32 bit application running on 64 bit Vista will see only 4GB
    >> memory, even if you have more than 4GB installed..
    >>
    >> see:
    >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr..._windows_vista
    >>
    >
    > I would agree, except that Windows System information is showing 4GB
    > Total Memory, even though
    > it shows 8GB Physical Memory Installed.
    >
    > Fitz
    Where is "Windows" reporting 4 GB total memory and 8GB installed memory? What
    program(s) are you running that show you this?

    What does something like CPU-Z show?

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #5


    Fitz Guest

    Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory

    Thanks for that - the run command info was really helpful!

    Fitz

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  6. #6


    Poutnik Guest

    Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory

    Keith H's previous post was like this :

    >

    > you could always run c:\windows\syswow64\systeminfo.exe
    > from a command window.. this is a 64bit app..
    >
    It looks like common mistake.

    64bit executables are not in syswow64, but in system32.
    ( MS logic )

    Short look to Process Explorer will show you
    systeminfo from syswow64 is 32bit app.

    --
    Poutnik
    The best choice is such a choice,
    that causes the least number of people
    to complain it is NOT the best choice.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7. #7



    Newbie
    Join Date : Apr 2009
    Posts : 1
    Vista
    Local Time: 02:09 AM


     

    Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory

    I just found this issue on my machine also. I have the same thing in the bios that you have. I have followed all suggestions I can find and still the same thing. If windows doesn't see it, I dont see how it could have anything to do with the program your are running. I would understand if a 32bit program can only use 4gb. I want all 8 for as much as possible.

    This is annoying.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8. #8


    James Johnson Guest

    Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory


    "seaborn" <guest@xxxxxx-email.com> wrote in message
    news:e80089d7d7ea38a334ccbaec33b4ea0e@xxxxxx-gateway.com...

    >
    > I just found this issue on my machine also. I have the same thing in the
    > bios that you have. I have followed all suggestions I can find and still
    > the same thing. If windows doesn't see it, I dont see how it could have
    > anything to do with the program your are running. I would understand if
    > a 32bit program can only use 4gb. I want all 8 for as much as possible.
    >
    > This is annoying.
    >
    >
    > --
    >
    seaborn

    I'm late coming to this thread, but if it's concerning the system
    informatrion aplet reporting memory as stated in the subject, it's a bug in
    the program. There is a lot of discussion on this topic on the web and a hot
    fix is available. Basically if Task Manager etc. report all you memory (say
    8 GB) then you are good to go.

    Jim


      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory problems?

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
total memory available is only 3.3GB with 4GB physical memory under windows 7 64 bit someone Vista General 17 12 Jan 2010
Total vs Available Physical Memory Prob NevR General Discussion 7 13 Aug 2009
installed physical memory vs total physical memory jspencer General Discussion 10 08 Jul 2009
Installed Physical Memory/Total Physical Memory Roy69z Vista installation & setup 2 01 Apr 2009
Installed/Total Physical Memory Discrepancies Bare Foot Kid General Discussion 7 08 Mar 2009