![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory I'm running Vista 64 Home (SP1) Premium on a homebuilt machine w/8GB (4 X 2GB modules). Windows is reporting 8 GB of Installed Physical Memory but is reporting only 4 GB of Total Physical Memory. I first noticed this when, after installing a game, the game system specs said 3092 MB of RAM. I have checked the BIOS and it recognizes 8 GB. Memory Remapping is Enabled. Under Memory Remapping is "PCI MMIO Allocation: 4GB to 3328 MB" (?) MSConfig Boot Options shows Max Memory is not checked and no value in the box below. I tried enabling it and using 8192 as the value, but it made no difference. DxDiag shows 8 GB installed RAM. Any ideas on how I can get windows to make available all 8 GB of RAM? (Motherboard is ASUS Maximus II Extreme w/Intel Q9550 processor running at Q9650 clock speed, memory running at 1127 MHz) Thanks, Fitz -- Your body is a temple boy, You ought to treat it well But you trash the place and rent it out Like it's some cheap motel - The Badlees |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory Fitz wrote: Quote: > I'm running Vista 64 Home (SP1) Premium on a homebuilt machine > w/8GB (4 X 2GB modules). Windows is reporting 8 GB of Installed > Physical Memory but is reporting only 4 GB of Total Physical Memory. > > I first noticed this when, after installing a game, the game system > specs said 3092 MB of RAM. > bit application running on 64 bit Vista will see only 4GB memory, even if you have more than 4GB installed.. see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr..._windows_vista |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory Quote: Quote: >> > is, a 32 bit application running on 64 bit Vista will see only 4GB > memory, even if you have more than 4GB installed.. > > see: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr..._windows_vista > it shows 8GB Physical Memory Installed. Fitz -- Your body is a temple boy, You ought to treat it well But you trash the place and rent it out Like it's some cheap motel - The Badlees |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory Fitz wrote: Quote: > Quote: Quote: >>> >> is, a 32 bit application running on 64 bit Vista will see only 4GB >> memory, even if you have more than 4GB installed.. >> >> see: >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr..._windows_vista >> > I would agree, except that Windows System information is showing 4GB > Total Memory, even though > it shows 8GB Physical Memory Installed. > > Fitz program(s) are you running that show you this? What does something like CPU-Z show? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory Thanks for that - the run command info was really helpful! Fitz |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory Keith H's previous post was like this : Quote: > Quote: > you could always run c:\windows\syswow64\systeminfo.exe > from a command window.. this is a 64bit app.. > 64bit executables are not in syswow64, but in system32. ( MS logic ) Short look to Process Explorer will show you systeminfo from syswow64 is 32bit app. -- Poutnik The best choice is such a choice, that causes the least number of people to complain it is NOT the best choice. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Vista | Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory I just found this issue on my machine also. I have the same thing in the bios that you have. I have followed all suggestions I can find and still the same thing. If windows doesn't see it, I dont see how it could have anything to do with the program your are running. I would understand if a 32bit program can only use 4gb. I want all 8 for as much as possible. This is annoying. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory "seaborn" <guest@xxxxxx-email.com> wrote in message news:e80089d7d7ea38a334ccbaec33b4ea0e@xxxxxx-gateway.com... Quote: > > I just found this issue on my machine also. I have the same thing in the > bios that you have. I have followed all suggestions I can find and still > the same thing. If windows doesn't see it, I dont see how it could have > anything to do with the program your are running. I would understand if > a 32bit program can only use 4gb. I want all 8 for as much as possible. > > This is annoying. > > > -- > I'm late coming to this thread, but if it's concerning the system informatrion aplet reporting memory as stated in the subject, it's a bug in the program. There is a lot of discussion on this topic on the web and a hot fix is available. Basically if Task Manager etc. report all you memory (say 8 GB) then you are good to go. Jim |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Total vs Available Physical Memory Prob | General Discussion | |||
| installed physical memory vs total physical memory | General Discussion | |||
| Installed Physical Memory/Total Physical Memory | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Installed/Total Physical Memory Discrepancies | General Discussion | |||
| Re: Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value? | Vista General | |||