![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | 80+Running processes and 50%+ physical memory I just want to know how to optimize vista,I run very few programs except Zone Alarm Pro and Symantec antivirus. But in the task manager, there are 80 running processes, and 50%+ physical memory,the CPU usage is usually 15%-50%. Is there any professional software to optimize vista PS, friends told me vista is crappy and xp is better, but I have no other choices cuz the OS is from the HP. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: 80+Running processes and 50%+ physical memory "john" <null> wrote: Quote: > I just want to know how to optimize vista,I run very few programs except > Zone Alarm Pro and Symantec antivirus. But in the task manager, there are > 80 running processes, and 50%+ physical memory,the CPU usage is usually > 15%-50%. Is there any professional software to optimize vista > > PS, friends told me vista is crappy and xp is better, but I have no other > choices cuz the OS is from the HP. out there: Zone Alarm and Symantec (Norton) Antivirus. Uninstall both of them. Use a better antivirus such as NOD32 (commercial) or Avast (free). The built-in Windows Firewall is fine for most people. You will be amazed at how much faster and responsive your computer is. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: 80+Running processes and 50%+ physical memory Sorry, I have to add sth., I also installed Acronis True Image 2009 to have more "professional" image backups(I found this program has improved very much since I used it a few years ago, And I set up a One click startup recovery using F11 if OS was crashed, and there is another start up recovery option came from HP company), and Acronis Disk Director Suite 10 to resize the partition Adobe Acrobat Pro and Office Plus 2007 are for file handling. You are running two of the most problematic and resource-hungry applications out there: Zone Alarm and Symantec (Norton) Antivirus. ---I am sorry that I use Zone Alarm Pro since using XP, and Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition 10 does not seem to be that "resource-hungry"> I am so used to both of them. Ps. I am using Vista Home Basic from HP, which does not provide many backup options for users. "Malke" <malke@xxxxxx> 写入消息 news:eIcDeMfsJHA.2148@xxxxxx Quote: > "john" <null> wrote: > Quote: >> I just want to know how to optimize vista,I run very few programs except >> Zone Alarm Pro and Symantec antivirus. But in the task manager, there are >> 80 running processes, and 50%+ physical memory,the CPU usage is usually >> 15%-50%. Is there any professional software to optimize vista >> >> PS, friends told me vista is crappy and xp is better, but I have no other >> choices cuz the OS is from the HP. > You are running two of the most problematic and resource-hungry > applications > out there: Zone Alarm and Symantec (Norton) Antivirus. Uninstall both of > them. Use a better antivirus such as NOD32 (commercial) or Avast (free). > The built-in Windows Firewall is fine for most people. > > You will be amazed at how much faster and responsive your computer is. > > Malke > -- > MS-MVP > Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! > http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: 80+Running processes and 50%+ physical memory "john" <null> wrote: Quote: > Sorry, I have to add sth., I also installed Acronis True Image 2009 to > have more "professional" image backups(I found this program has improved > very much since I used it a few years ago, And I set up a One click > startup recovery using F11 if OS was crashed, and there is another start > up recovery option came from HP company), and Acronis Disk Director Suite > 10 to resize the partition > > Adobe Acrobat Pro and Office Plus 2007 are for file handling. > > You are running two of the most problematic and resource-hungry > applications out there: Zone Alarm and Symantec (Norton) Antivirus. > ---I am sorry that I use Zone Alarm Pro since using XP, and Symantec > Antivirus Corporate Edition 10 does not seem to be that "resource-hungry"> > I am so used to both of them. > > > Ps. I am using Vista Home Basic from HP? which does not provide many > backup options for users. your computer is slow. All of the programs you listed (except AFAIK for Office) run processes in the background. Perhaps you don't have enough physical memory for all the stuff you want to run. You should have at least 3GB. Yes, it does make a difference that you have Symantec's corporate edition and it would have been nice if you'd stated that in the first place. However, my opinion about ZA Pro is unchanged. If you want to run it, naturally that's your choice. Acronis TI is an excellent choice but you certainly don't need another backup program running too. You probably aalso have a lot of HP's preinstalled stuff running. Optimize your Startup, leaving everything you want/need and removing unnecessary programs, etc. For example, Adobe Acrobat doesn't need to have a running process for the program to work. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: 80+Running processes and 50%+ physical memory Thank you very much. You probably also have a lot of HP's preinstalled stuff running. ----exactly, but the security tools/credential managers are what I like, so I will keep them running. You should have at least 3GB. ----That is amazing, I have 2GB now.Is it worth buying additional RAM ONLY for a good looking OS? Also the CPU usage is unusually at the high percentage 15%-50%. My CPU is very good. Personally I think Vista is very like XP SP3. The disadvantage of Vista is that only ultimate version provide multilingual package, and the ultimate version has so many unnecessary functions. I know many friends who have their vista from HP uninstalled, and installed XP mannually for better performance( It seems to be very difficult cuz HP and other hardware providers "struggled" to meet the needs of Microsoft, all the hardwares nowadays are made for Vista, so are the different drives , but It could worth it if one is used to XP for quite a long period? --Is it necessary to keep "fashion" using OS and sacrifice the time to adjust the habit of using computer?) I am considering installing the old XP, too, even at the risk of OS crash(There is F11 one click recovery to overwrite the current system state) what do you think? John "Malke" <malke@xxxxxx> 写入消息 news:eOVRvlfsJHA.3848@xxxxxx Quote: > "john" <null> wrote: > Quote: >> Sorry, I have to add sth., I also installed Acronis True Image 2009 to >> have more "professional" image backups(I found this program has improved >> very much since I used it a few years ago, And I set up a One click >> startup recovery using F11 if OS was crashed, and there is another start >> up recovery option came from HP company), and Acronis Disk Director Suite >> 10 to resize the partition >> >> Adobe Acrobat Pro and Office Plus 2007 are for file handling. >> >> You are running two of the most problematic and resource-hungry >> applications out there: Zone Alarm and Symantec (Norton) Antivirus. >> ---I am sorry that I use Zone Alarm Pro since using XP, and Symantec >> Antivirus Corporate Edition 10 does not seem to be that >> "resource-hungry"> >> I am so used to both of them. >> >> >> Ps. I am using Vista Home Basic from HP? which does not provide many >> backup options for users. > You have too many processes running in the background, legitimate or not, > if > your computer is slow. All of the programs you listed (except AFAIK for > Office) run processes in the background. Perhaps you don't have enough > physical memory for all the stuff you want to run. You should have at > least > 3GB. Yes, it does make a difference that you have Symantec's corporate > edition and it would have been nice if you'd stated that in the first > place. However, my opinion about ZA Pro is unchanged. If you want to run > it, naturally that's your choice. Acronis TI is an excellent choice but > you > certainly don't need another backup program running too. You probably > aalso > have a lot of HP's preinstalled stuff running. > > Optimize your Startup, leaving everything you want/need and removing > unnecessary programs, etc. For example, Adobe Acrobat doesn't need to have > a running process for the program to work. > > Malke > -- > MS-MVP > Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! > http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: 80+Running processes and 50%+ physical memory "john" <null> wrote: Quote: > You probably also have a lot of HP's preinstalled stuff running. > ----exactly, but the security tools/credential managers are what I like, > so I will keep them running. > > You should have at least 3GB. > > ----That is amazing, I have 2GB now.Is it worth buying additional RAM ONLY > for a good looking OS? Also the CPU usage is unusually at the high > percentage 15%-50%. My CPU is very good. > > Personally I think Vista is very like XP SP3. The disadvantage of Vista is > that only ultimate version provide multilingual package, and the ultimate > version has so many unnecessary functions. > > I know many friends who have their vista from HP uninstalled, and > installed XP mannually for better performance( It seems to be very > difficult cuz HP and other hardware providers "struggled" to meet the > needs of Microsoft, all the hardwares nowadays are made for Vista, so are > the different drives , but It could worth it if one is used to XP for > quite a long period? --Is it necessary to keep "fashion" using OS and > sacrifice the time to adjust the habit of using computer?) > > I am considering installing the old XP, too, even at the risk of OS > crash(There is F11 one click recovery to overwrite the current system > state) looking for. You started this thread by implying that your computer was too slow yet you don't wish to change anything. If you want to run memory-hungry, processor-intensive programs that are resident, add another 1GB of RAM for better performance. Vista is a memory hog. Vista is not like XP SP3 at all in its performance needs. As for whether XP will meet your needs better, I can't answer that. Only you know what you want. Here is my usual information about replacing Vista with XP: A. On an OEM (HP, Sony, etc.) computer: 1. Go to the OEM's website and look for XP drivers for your specific model computer. If there are no XP drivers, then you can't install XP. End of story. If there are drivers, download them and store on a CD-R or USB thumbdrive; you'll need them after you install XP. 2. Check with the OEM - either from their tech support website or by calling them - to see if you will void your warranty if you do this. If you will void the warranty, you make the decision. 3. If the OEM does support XP on the machine, call them and see if you can have downgrade rights and have them send you an XP restore disk. This will be far the easiest and best way of getting XP on the machine. 4. If XP is supported on the machine but the OEM doesn't have an XP restore disk for you, understand that you'll need to purchase a retail copy of XP from your favorite online or brick/mortar store. 5. Also understand that you will need to do a clean install of XP so if you have any data you want, back it up first. 6. If none of the above is applicable to you because you can't run XP on that machine (see Item #1 above), return the computer and purchase one running XP instead. Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| installed physical memory vs total physical memory | General Discussion | |||
| Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory | Vista General | |||
| Installed Physical Memory/Total Physical Memory | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Comparing running processes | Vista General | |||
| Difference between Physical Memory and the Vista System Memory (Ra | Vista hardware & devices | |||