On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:12:57 -0700, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:16:48 -0500, Bill Daggett wrote:
>
>> "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:55:46 -0500, whs wrote: >>
>>>>> You had better listen to Malke - she's right, you're wrong...
>>>>>
>>>>> ....and you are putting your computer at risk.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
>>>>
>>>> Can you elaborate please. I am not sure I understand the point you
>>>> make.
>>>
>>>Malke's post pointed you to an article >>
>> [snip]
>>
>> I think you're confused, old bean...
>>
>> Malke was replying to "Clarissa", the OP. "whs" was trying to help
>> "Clarissa". >
> I just reread the subthread in question. I can tell you that I am not
> confused. Or maybe not "not confused" :-)
Reading just the subthread, I'd say my answer was apposite. Also, Malke
gave a related answer to the same post, and she, at least, is intelligent
:-)
Reading the *whole* thread, I have concluded that whs's post was not
clearly phrased, if he meant what you said - but I actually agree with you
now, that it is probably what he meant.
So I withdraw my prior sarcastic remark, now that is it on Usenet forever.
--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom