Vista - Vista OS can't be installed with the ghost image from ghost HDD.

Could help us to resolve following question.

1.Load BIOS Default settings,save and exit
2.Install Vista OS RC2.
3.Make Vista OS to image file to ghost HDD,then ghost OS with the image file
4.Restart EUT after ghost,but system can prompt message,and can't enter
system.
Ghost version is 8.0. Then we try to use latest version 10.0. But still
failed.
Thank you very much!!!

Hi,

Symantec hasn't released any Vista-compatible versions of their product sets
yet. See:
http://www.symantec.com/vista/Ent_Vista_FAQ.pdf

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"1538341" <1538341@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:00DEAA56-6FD2-46DA-9071-E9BCBF6E9833@microsoft.com...
> Could help us to resolve following question.
>
> 1.Load BIOS Default settings,save and exit
> 2.Install Vista OS RC2.
> 3.Make Vista OS to image file to ghost HDD,then ghost OS with the image
> file
> 4.Restart EUT after ghost,but system can prompt message,and can't enter
> system.
> Ghost version is 8.0. Then we try to use latest version 10.0. But still
> failed.
> Thank you very much!!!

"Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:uEF3V5B%23GHA.4740@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Symantec hasn't released any Vista-compatible versions of their product
> sets yet. See:
> http://www.symantec.com/vista/Ent_Vista_FAQ.pdf
>
> --
> Best of Luck,
>
> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

Symantec's needs to try their version of Ghost 2003 because it has no
problems imaging and restoring my version of Vista 64bit RC1.

Same here...Ghost 2003 bootable CD works great for creating/restoring Vista
partitions. Just don't try to install use Ghost from within Windows or mark
drives. Ghost 2003 was the last version based upon the original Norton
Ghost software. After that, Symantec changed to DriveImage-based software,
which they took and completely trashed to where it's unreliable in a lot of
systems, and marketing it to newbies that will blindly try to use it, then
trash their systems.

Russell
http://tastycomputers.com

"Philly" <unspamme@youbet.com> wrote in message
news:3yO%g.4649$vC1.3666@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>
>
> Symantec's needs to try their version of Ghost 2003 because it has no
> problems imaging and restoring my version of Vista 64bit RC1.
>

"Works" does not equal "Supported". Yes, it works; no I won't rely on it
for anything but personal use.

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
* My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm


"Philly" <unspamme@youbet.com> wrote in message
news:3yO%g.4649$vC1.3666@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...

> Symantec's needs to try their version of Ghost 2003 because it has no
> problems imaging and restoring my version of Vista 64bit RC1.

Dear All,

Thanks your kindly support!
I will try to get GHOST 2003 to veirfy it. Could you tell us if it support
32-bit system?
In addition, according to Symantec' FAQ, the Beta Version has released on
10/3, cooul you have gotted it?

"Richard G. Harper" wrote:

> "Works" does not equal "Supported". Yes, it works; no I won't rely on it
> for anything but personal use.>
>
> > Symantec's needs to try their version of Ghost 2003 because it has no
> > problems imaging and restoring my version of Vista 64bit RC1.
>
>
>

To my knowledge it was not released as originally predicted. Not uncommon.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"1538341" <1538341@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:65A02B50-F58D-4D25-97D8-162D2B47735E@microsoft.com...
> Dear All,
>
> Thanks your kindly support!
> I will try to get GHOST 2003 to veirfy it. Could you tell us if it support
> 32-bit system?
> In addition, according to Symantec' FAQ, the Beta Version has released on
> 10/3, cooul you have gotted it?
>
> "Richard G. Harper" wrote:
>
>> "Works" does not equal "Supported". Yes, it works; no I won't rely on it
>> for anything but personal use.>
>>
>> > Symantec's needs to try their version of Ghost 2003 because it has no
>> > problems imaging and restoring my version of Vista 64bit RC1.
>>
>>
>>