![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Windows 7 upgrade experiences I have a client where more than a few users are running Vista Business or Ultimate and despise it because of the slow performance, freezes, long startup times, etc. These are typically Lenovo laptops or tablets running Intel Core Duo processors of 2GHZ or better speed and 4G of RAM. In the past I have checked these computers for malware and tried to optimize best I could eliminating uneeded startup programs, disabling indexing, optimizing power settings for performance, etc. That usually helped somewhat but not enough to make them happy. Now they want to upgrade to Windows 7. I am wondering what experiences users have had in upgrading such computers in that have you seen a notable improvement in performance with the simple upgrade path or did it require a clean install to get performance to be better. I am trying to avoid the clean install route because of the extra time it will take to reconfigure all the settings, FIND and reinstall ALL the software, plug ins, and drivers, and backup/restore data. Thanks for any advice, experinces, and other feedback. --- Steve |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences Old Rookie wrote: Quote: > I have a client where more than a few users are running Vista Business or > Ultimate and despise it because of the slow performance, freezes, long > startup times, etc. These are typically Lenovo laptops or tablets running > Intel Core Duo processors of 2GHZ or better speed and 4G of RAM. In the past > I have checked these computers for malware and tried to optimize best I > could eliminating uneeded startup programs, disabling indexing, optimizing > power settings for performance, etc. That usually helped somewhat but not > enough to make them happy. > > Now they want to upgrade to Windows 7. I am wondering what experiences users > have had in upgrading such computers in that have you seen a notable > improvement in performance with the simple upgrade path or did it require a > clean install to get performance to be better. I am trying to avoid the > clean install route because of the extra time it will take to reconfigure > all the settings, FIND and reinstall ALL the software, plug ins, and > drivers, and backup/restore data. > > Thanks for any advice, experinces, and other feedback. --- Steve > > > I have a "test" machine and can tell you that Win 7 does , perform better than Vista...enough of an improvement that I'd say is worthwhile. As a general statement...no matter what the OS... a clean install is the best way to go..it generally guarantees a good install. I suppose what you could do...is back up all the data and try and upgrade and see what happens... but do not upgrade any other machines until it's given a good test for at least a week or so |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:37:52 -0600, philo <philo@newsgroup> wrote: Quote: > As a general statement...no matter what the OS... > a clean install is the best way to go..it generally guarantees a good > install. I disagree. Although many people will tell you that formatting and installing cleanly is the best way to go, I disagree. Unlike with previous versions of Windows, an upgrade to Windows versions starting with XP replaces almost everything, and usually works very well. My recommendation is to at least try the upgrade, since it's much easier than a clean installation. You can always change your mind and reinstall cleanly if problems develop. However, don't assume that doing an upgrade relieves you of the need to backup your data, etc. before beginning. Before starting to upgrade, it's always prudent to recognize that things like a sudden power loss can occur in the middle of it and cause the loss of everything. For that reason you should make sure you have backups and anything else you need to reinstall if the worst happens. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Ubuntu 9.10 64 Bit | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences If you open the cmd prompt on Win7 you get the same exact version as you did vista... Thats why I wont buy it. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences > My recommendation is to at least try the upgrade, since it's much Quote: > easier than a clean installation. You can always change your mind and > reinstall cleanly if problems develop. (1) it raises tremendous user complaints and frustrations as we have seen over the years(even now) which could have been easily avoided, (2) it wastes time and effort for doing the upgrade install and this is for a "better" scenario and for a worse one, (3) it takes tremendous time and effort for troublshooting minor incompatibility and conflict issues that may not have sufraced at the install time and eventually leads to a clean install which should have been done in the first place. All of the above is for the "potential" and "uncertain" saving of re-installing applications which is the eaisest part, but it cannot save any efforts for: (1) back up data (2) testing application settings and configurations - which is the most important and time-consuming task (3) exporting and importing settings and preferences. The number one rule of thumb for performing a major system task (such as uprading an OS) is to minimize system downtime and productivity loss for which a failed upgrade install will do the opposite and can only be achieved by a clean install on a new partition/HDD. A true preofessional advise is to give the most sure way instead of preaching for unnecessary risks for minimum or nonexistent returns. "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@newsgroup> wrote in message news:6d0ff5lfp1kqiaenn3bg96682jm9322e04@newsgroup Quote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:37:52 -0600, philo <philo@newsgroup> > wrote: > > Quote: >> As a general statement...no matter what the OS... >> a clean install is the best way to go..it generally guarantees a good >> install. > > I disagree. > > Although many people will tell you that formatting and installing > cleanly is the best way to go, I disagree. Unlike with previous > versions of Windows, an upgrade to Windows versions starting with XP > replaces almost everything, and usually works very well. > > My recommendation is to at least try the upgrade, since it's much > easier than a clean installation. You can always change your mind and > reinstall cleanly if problems develop. > > However, don't assume that doing an upgrade relieves you of the need > to backup your data, etc. before beginning. Before starting to > upgrade, it's always prudent to recognize that things like a sudden > power loss can occur in the middle of it and cause the loss of > everything. For that reason you should make sure you have backups and > anything else you need to reinstall if the worst happens. > > -- > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 > Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences You sure you ain't looking at PowerShell? I get a distinctly different version at a command prompt comparing Vista and Windows 7. "CrucialHoax" <guest@newsgroup-email.com> wrote in message news:ee713862ce870d25f1b9d1cb9d18b8a1@newsgroup-gateway.com... Quote: > > If you open the cmd prompt on Win7 you get the same exact version as you > did vista... Thats why I wont buy it. > > > -- > CrucialHoax |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences Thanks for the replies. I am going to try the upgrade install first and see how that goes and as mentioned I can always do a clean install later if the upgrade install does not show some noticable improvement in performance and reliability. I usually go to this client once a week and I can let the upgrade install run while I doing other tasks [about 30 users on site] so the dollar expense to the client to do the upgrade install will be very minimial assuming all goes well. Steve "Old Rookie" <somewhere@newsgroup> wrote in message news:e40DQGMYKHA.5368@newsgroup Quote: >I have a client where more than a few users are running Vista Business or >Ultimate and despise it because of the slow performance, freezes, long >startup times, etc. These are typically Lenovo laptops or tablets running >Intel Core Duo processors of 2GHZ or better speed and 4G of RAM. In the >past I have checked these computers for malware and tried to optimize best >I could eliminating uneeded startup programs, disabling indexing, >optimizing power settings for performance, etc. That usually helped >somewhat but not enough to make them happy. > > Now they want to upgrade to Windows 7. I am wondering what experiences > users have had in upgrading such computers in that have you seen a notable > improvement in performance with the simple upgrade path or did it require > a clean install to get performance to be better. I am trying to avoid the > clean install route because of the extra time it will take to reconfigure > all the settings, FIND and reinstall ALL the software, plug ins, and > drivers, and backup/restore data. > > Thanks for any advice, experinces, and other feedback. --- Steve > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:25:35 -0600, philo <philo@newsgroup> wrote: Quote: > Ken Blake, MVP wrote: Quote: > > On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:37:52 -0600, philo <philo@newsgroup> > > wrote: > > > > Quote: > >> As a general statement...no matter what the OS... > >> a clean install is the best way to go..it generally guarantees a good > >> install. > > > > I disagree. > > > Sorry there old bud > but I've never seen a fresh install fail (assuming the hardware is good). I didn't suggest otherwise. The reason I recommend an upgrade over a clean installation is that it can save an enormous amount of work, reinstalling all your apps and configuring the apps and Windows. Quote: > Most upgrades have ended up with anywhere from minor problems to major > ones. (Not strictly saying they won't work.) I have done *many* upgrades. I've never seen any such problems, unless there were problems (such as malware infection) there when the upgrade was done. The one time I recommend against upgrades is when you are already dealing with problems. An upgrade is likely to exacerbate the problems, not fix them. Quote: > The biggest danger are those that seemingly work...but leave behind > subtle instabilities that lead the user with the initial feeling that > the system is OK...but over the next few weeks can lead to major problems. That has never been my experience. Quote: > For the past few years I have been a Microsoft authorized refurbisher > and do volunteer work for an NPO. I've literally done hundreds if not > thousands of rebuilds and have tested the upgrade process many times. > > About the only time an upgrade will work absolutely correctly is if the > original OS is in pristine condition. In the real world there is no such > thing. The number of hours spent properly prepping the system would > probably be more time consuming and difficult than just backing up the data > (confirming the data are good) then performing a clean install. > > > One alternative is to install the new OS on a second partition and dual > boot... > then migrate over to the new OS little by little. > > > However, if you note I did tell the OP no harm in trying... > as long as all data are backed up. > Then test the system for a week or so before upgrading other machines No, I don't remember your saying that, but if you did, that's very close to my point off view, and we in are pretty close agreement Quote: Quote: > > Although many people will tell you that formatting and installing > > cleanly is the best way to go, I disagree. Unlike with previous > > versions of Windows, an upgrade to Windows versions starting with XP > > replaces almost everything, and usually works very well. > > > > My recommendation is to at least try the upgrade, since it's much > > easier than a clean installation. You can always change your mind and > > reinstall cleanly if problems develop. > > > > However, don't assume that doing an upgrade relieves you of the need > > to backup your data, etc. before beginning. Before starting to > > upgrade, it's always prudent to recognize that things like a sudden > > power loss can occur in the middle of it and cause the loss of > > everything. For that reason you should make sure you have backups and > > anything else you need to reinstall if the worst happens. > > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences Ken Blake, MVP wrote: Quote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:25:35 -0600, philo <philo@newsgroup> > wrote: > Quote: >> Ken Blake, MVP wrote: Quote: >>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:37:52 -0600, philo <philo@newsgroup> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> As a general statement...no matter what the OS... >>>> a clean install is the best way to go..it generally guarantees a good >>>> install. >>> >>> I disagree. >> >> Sorry there old bud >> but I've never seen a fresh install fail (assuming the hardware is good). > > I didn't suggest otherwise. The reason I recommend an upgrade over a > clean installation is that it can save an enormous amount of work, > reinstalling all your apps and configuring the apps and Windows. > > Quote: >> Most upgrades have ended up with anywhere from minor problems to major >> ones. (Not strictly saying they won't work.) > > I have done *many* upgrades. I've never seen any such problems, unless > there were problems (such as malware infection) there when the upgrade > was done. > > The one time I recommend against upgrades is when you are already > dealing with problems. An upgrade is likely to exacerbate the > problems, not fix them. > > > Quote: >> The biggest danger are those that seemingly work...but leave behind >> subtle instabilities that lead the user with the initial feeling that >> the system is OK...but over the next few weeks can lead to major problems. > > > That has never been my experience. > > Quote: >> For the past few years I have been a Microsoft authorized refurbisher >> and do volunteer work for an NPO. I've literally done hundreds if not >> thousands of rebuilds and have tested the upgrade process many times. >> >> About the only time an upgrade will work absolutely correctly is if the >> original OS is in pristine condition. In the real world there is no such >> thing. The number of hours spent properly prepping the system would >> probably be more time consuming and difficult than just backing up the data >> (confirming the data are good) then performing a clean install. >> >> >> One alternative is to install the new OS on a second partition and dual >> boot... >> then migrate over to the new OS little by little. >> >> >> However, if you note I did tell the OP no harm in trying... >> as long as all data are backed up. >> Then test the system for a week or so before upgrading other machines > > No, I don't remember your saying that, but if you did, that's very > close to my point off view, and we in are pretty close agreement > > This was taken from my first post , in case you missed it -----quote----- I suppose what you could do...is back up all the data and try and upgrade and see what happens... but do not upgrade any other machines until it's given a good test for at least a week or so ----end of quote---- So I think we are at least mostly in agreement ... I personally have not had much luck with upgrades. <snip> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Windows 7 upgrade experiences On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:49:58 -0600, philo <philo@newsgroup> wrote: Quote: Quote: Quote: > >> However, if you note I did tell the OP no harm in trying... > >> as long as all data are backed up. > >> Then test the system for a week or so before upgrading other machines > > > > No, I don't remember your saying that, but if you did, that's very > > close to my point off view, and we in are pretty close agreement > > > > > > This was taken from my first post , in case you missed it Yes, thanks--I either missed it, or simply forgot it. And lest you should think otherwise, I wasn't accusing you of saying something that wasn't true. Quote: > -----quote----- > > I suppose what you could do...is back up all the data and try and upgrade > and see what happens... > > but do not upgrade any other machines until it's given a good test > for at least a week or so > > > > ----end of quote---- > > So I think we are at least mostly in agreement ... Yes, and glad to see that. Quote: > I personally have not had much luck with upgrades. We are all different of course. I've had almost all good luck with them. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Instal experiences | Vista installation & setup | |||
| Microsoft Makes VoIP Experiences Easier With One-Stop Shopping, Showcasing Windows Live Messenger Accessories | Vista News | |||
| Microsoft Makes VoIP Experiences Easier With One-Stop Shopping, Showcasing Windows Live Messenger Accessories | Vista News | |||
| Toyota Motor Experiences the Power of CATIA V5 on Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition | Vista News | |||
| Toyota Motor Experiences the Power of CATIA V5 on Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition | Vista News | |||