![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | MS Live One Care How does Windows Live One Care compare with Norton Anti-Virus? Does it do a comparable job of detecting & eliminating viruses, etc? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: MS Live One Care Yes. "Thomas Jones" <tajones50@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uaJSPK7QHHA.4060@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > How does Windows Live One Care compare with Norton Anti-Virus? Does it do > a comparable job of detecting & eliminating viruses, etc? > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: MS Live One Care In my humble opinion after years of fixing Norton screwups for people on forums and beta testing WOC from the first day and continuing to test it in the future: 1) WOC takes less space. 2) WOC now is considerably less buggy. 3) Norton tends to break for a siginifcant percent of users or have significant problems after it has been setup even months out. 4) Norton requires more CPU day in day out. 5) Norton often does not install or uninstall cleanly and to uninstall often requires a) special zap tools b) tedious manual uninstalls that are time consuming and require deleting multiple registry keys and files that are easy to find once you have done this several times but not easy to find when you have not 6) Symantec (Norton') KB situation is byzantine, disorganized, unweildy, systemically lacks updates. That'd be at www.norton.com/search 7) I've found them to be manipulative in the vein of trying to get you to buy a new yellow box every year when that isn't needed. 8) Updating definitions is crucial. Norton does it every Wednesday in the latter afternoon or early evening Pacific US time. If you want to do it daily, you have to do it manually by shortcutting to Intelligent Updater. Win One Care does it seamlessly consistently in the background. 9) Finally, Norton is more expensive than WOC which is very reasonably priced and allows you to take the rougly $30 application and use it on 3 boxes. There are some discounts on this in US stores right now that ran in yesterday's papers. Good luck, CH "Thomas Jones" <tajones50@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uaJSPK7QHHA.4060@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > How does Windows Live One Care compare with Norton Anti-Virus? Does it do > a comparable job of detecting & eliminating viruses, etc? > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: MS Live One Care I forgot to add that WOC has additiona feature including a tuneup to promote better CPU use, and a backup that has considerable functionality althought not quite as robust as the one in Vista. That backup alone is worth the modest price if you don't have Vista. http://get.live.com/onecare/features http://windowsonecare.spaces.live.com/ There is also a public group with MVP participation to help with questions/problems: http://forums.microsoft.com/windowso....aspx?siteid=2 CH CH "Thomas Jones" <tajones50@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:uaJSPK7QHHA.4060@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > How does Windows Live One Care compare with Norton Anti-Virus? Does it do > a comparable job of detecting & eliminating viruses, etc? > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: MS Live One Care Norton is so intrusive that there were times when I felt like I was actually running Windows on my Norton OS. In spite of the hyperbole, I am glad I wised up and dumped it. "Chad Harris" <fixvista-itneedsit.net> wrote in message news:uguolC8QHHA.1860@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > In my humble opinion after years of fixing Norton screwups for people on > forums and beta testing WOC from the first day and continuing to test it > in the future: > > 1) WOC takes less space. > > 2) WOC now is considerably less buggy. > > 3) Norton tends to break for a siginifcant percent of users or have > significant problems after it has been setup even months out. > > 4) Norton requires more CPU day in day out. > > 5) Norton often does not install or uninstall cleanly and to uninstall > often requires > > a) special zap tools > b) tedious manual uninstalls that are time consuming and require deleting > multiple registry keys and files that are easy to find once you have done > this several times but not easy to find when you have not > > 6) Symantec (Norton') KB situation is byzantine, disorganized, unweildy, > systemically lacks updates. > > That'd be at www.norton.com/search > > 7) I've found them to be manipulative in the vein of trying to get you to > buy a new yellow box every year when that isn't needed. > > 8) Updating definitions is crucial. Norton does it every Wednesday in the > latter afternoon or early evening Pacific US time. If you want to do it > daily, you have to do it manually by shortcutting to Intelligent Updater. > > Win One Care does it seamlessly consistently in the background. > > 9) Finally, Norton is more expensive than WOC which is very reasonably > priced and allows you to take the rougly $30 application and use it on 3 > boxes. There are some discounts on this in US stores right now that ran > in yesterday's papers. > > Good luck, > > CH > > > > "Thomas Jones" <tajones50@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:uaJSPK7QHHA.4060@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> How does Windows Live One Care compare with Norton Anti-Virus? Does it do >> a comparable job of detecting & eliminating viruses, etc? >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: MS Live One Care "Thomas Jones" wrote > How does Windows Live One Care compare with Norton Anti-Virus? Does it do > a comparable job of detecting & eliminating viruses, etc? As an Anti-Virus Norton has a better hit rate. OneCare is one of the worst for that. On the other hand Norton home products take a horrible toll on the system in resources, and often cause problems, either sooner or later. In the XP OS, your much better off not using any of the Norton Home products nor any of the other large security suites. Vista hasn't been out long enough and I don't even know if NAV works on Vista yet, but I can't see Symantec changing their ways and making it lean and smooth running. I have not worked with the other features of Live OneCare but based on the AV aspect I would recommend against using it for now. There are some good 3rd party AV programs, both free and cost: AVG, Avast, Nod32. -- Rock [MVP - User/Shell] |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: MS Live One Care Do you find that WOC is customized and tuned for VISTA when you install it on a VISTA system. Does it customize and enhance the VISTA Firewall or do you end up with two firewalls and have to decide which one to use? Does the WOC tune-up enhance the tune-up scheduled defrag and backup included in VISTA or does it replace the VISTA tune-up and backup tools? Does WOC recognize VISTA enhancements like Windows Mobile Device Center and properly configure the firewall to allow Windows Mobile device syncing? Bill Walter "Chad Harris" <fixvista-itneedsit.net> wrote in message news:uguolC8QHHA.1860@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > In my humble opinion after years of fixing Norton screwups for people on > forums and beta testing WOC from the first day and continuing to test it > in the future: > > 1) WOC takes less space. > > 2) WOC now is considerably less buggy. > > 3) Norton tends to break for a siginifcant percent of users or have > significant problems after it has been setup even months out. > > 4) Norton requires more CPU day in day out. > > 5) Norton often does not install or uninstall cleanly and to uninstall > often requires > > a) special zap tools > b) tedious manual uninstalls that are time consuming and require deleting > multiple registry keys and files that are easy to find once you have done > this several times but not easy to find when you have not > > 6) Symantec (Norton') KB situation is byzantine, disorganized, unweildy, > systemically lacks updates. > > That'd be at www.norton.com/search > > 7) I've found them to be manipulative in the vein of trying to get you to > buy a new yellow box every year when that isn't needed. > > 8) Updating definitions is crucial. Norton does it every Wednesday in the > latter afternoon or early evening Pacific US time. If you want to do it > daily, you have to do it manually by shortcutting to Intelligent Updater. > > Win One Care does it seamlessly consistently in the background. > > 9) Finally, Norton is more expensive than WOC which is very reasonably > priced and allows you to take the rougly $30 application and use it on 3 > boxes. There are some discounts on this in US stores right now that ran > in yesterday's papers. > > Good luck, > > CH > > > > "Thomas Jones" <tajones50@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:uaJSPK7QHHA.4060@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> How does Windows Live One Care compare with Norton Anti-Virus? Does it do >> a comparable job of detecting & eliminating viruses, etc? >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: MS Live One Care OneCare has a different firewall engine than Vista and turns Vista firewall off. OneCare firewall has predefined rules for WMDC. You do not have to know port numbers etc. However, it does not turn on the rule automatically. You need to go to firewall tab in Advanced settings, open firewall connection tool and configure the port number. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Live One Care | Windows Live | |||
| Re: Live One Care | Vista General | |||
| Live One Care | Vista security | |||
| Live One Care | Vista installation & setup | |||
| one live care | Vista General | |||