Windows Vista Forums

Memory
  1. #1


    KBOB Guest

    Memory

    Isn't Vista supposed to reconize more memory than previous versions? I have
    4GB of memory and Vista only sees 2814MB of it! Can someone tell me whats
    going on?



      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2. #2


    Byron Hinson Guest

    Re: Memory

    To use up 4GB or more you need to use the 64-bit version of Windows....there
    are a load of posts here about it and where that other 800MB's of yours has
    gone.

    --
    Byron Hinson
    ActiveWin Windows Site: http://www.activewin.com
    Photos: http://www.byronhinson.com


    "KBOB" <KBOB@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    news:79C101C9-BB9B-434B-8789-CB2218E02CBA@microsoft.com...
    > Isn't Vista supposed to reconize more memory than previous versions? I
    > have
    > 4GB of memory and Vista only sees 2814MB of it! Can someone tell me whats
    > going on?



      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3. #3


    KBOB Guest

    Re: Memory

    I am not that up on the differences in the two (64bit vs 32bit). Any benefit
    to going to the 64bit other than the memory being seen by Vista?

    "Byron Hinson" wrote:

    > To use up 4GB or more you need to use the 64-bit version of Windows....there
    > are a load of posts here about it and where that other 800MB's of yours has
    > gone.
    >
    > --
    > Byron Hinson
    > ActiveWin Windows Site: http://www.activewin.com
    > Photos: http://www.byronhinson.com
    >
    >
    > "KBOB" <KBOB@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    > news:79C101C9-BB9B-434B-8789-CB2218E02CBA@microsoft.com...
    > > Isn't Vista supposed to reconize more memory than previous versions? I
    > > have
    > > 4GB of memory and Vista only sees 2814MB of it! Can someone tell me whats
    > > going on?

    >


      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  4. #4


    Rock Guest

    Re: Memory

    "KBOB" <KBOB@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote

    > Isn't Vista supposed to reconize more memory than previous versions? I
    > have
    > 4GB of memory and Vista only sees 2814MB of it! Can someone tell me whats
    > going on?


    The x86 versions of Vista are the same in handling 4GB memory as XP. All
    4GB is used, it's just that depending on the hardware some of this memory is
    reserved by and used by the system and hardware. It's not available for the
    user but it is being used.

    --
    Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]


      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  5. #5


    BSchnur Guest

    Re: Memory

    > I am not that up on the differences in the two (64bit vs 32bit). Any benefit
    > to going to the 64bit other than the memory being seen by Vista?
    >

    Vista 64 has better security and memory protection handling.

    Currently there are more driver issues with Vista 64 but that may
    change.

    There may come a time when Vista 64 specific application software is
    readily available and outperforms 32 bit application software.


    --
    Barry Schnur
    Novell Support Connection Volunteer Sysop

      My System SpecsSystem Spec

Memory

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vista runs out of physical memory when working with files > 1GB - memory management issue? Robert Janik Vista performance & maintenance 2 21 Apr 2010
Mystery Vista Used Memory grows until Out of Memory and crash - howto diagnose? hogwell Vista performance & maintenance 0 13 Apr 2009
Dedicated Graphical Memory & Shared System Memory Jason Vista hardware & devices 3 18 May 2008
Re: GC.Collect() not cleaning memory, how to find out what references to lots of memory still exist? Henning Krause [MVP - Exchange] .NET General 1 15 Apr 2008
Difference between Physical Memory and the Vista System Memory (Ra DP Vista hardware & devices 2 20 Feb 2008