![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Desktop Composition and Flip-3D I have not been able to find a way to turn off flip-3D without turning off transparency in the Vista UI. Flip-3D is cute-looking but slows down workflow for two reasons: a) any animation takes time, and (mainly) b) the mouse cursor is does not land by default on the last-used-window, as the old Alt-Tab does, and it requires a considerably larger mouse movement to pick a window than to pick from a pop-up list. My Logitech super-mouse (the MX Revolution) has a special thumbwheel that activates the flip function. It is a <500 ms action to select another window on a pick list with a mouse movement of 10mm or less. With flip 3D the animation alone takes longer than that, besides the extra mousing time and motion. This is probably not objectionable unless, like me, you work with four or five major apps (Photoshop, InDesign, Bridge, MS Word, Acrobat) simultaneously and have to flip back and forth among them repetitively, many times an hour. I have no objection to the transparency, and it's useful enough that I would keep it turned on, but the Flip-3D is so annoying that I have to turn off Desktop Composition, which seems to eliminate both. (It took some searching even to find the definition of "Desktop Composition", since it's not in the included Help.) An option to retain one without the other would be welcome. As a note, I realize I am probably in a minority. My preferred "user experience" (I *hate* that term) has to do only with getting stuff done, not how entertaining the UI is -- especially animations that take time with no practical return. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com....vista.general |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Desktop Composition and Flip-3D Why not just use Alt-Tab instead then for the old functionality rather than using Win-Tab? It's still there and works just fine. "Alan G" <AlanG@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F5282AA5-3C12-48ED-9F1D-490DAE8DE69F@microsoft.com... >I have not been able to find a way to turn off flip-3D without turning off > transparency in the Vista UI. > > Flip-3D is cute-looking but slows down workflow for two reasons: a) any > animation takes time, and (mainly) b) the mouse cursor is does not land by > default on the last-used-window, as the old Alt-Tab does, and it requires > a > considerably larger mouse movement to pick a window than to pick from a > pop-up list. My Logitech super-mouse (the MX Revolution) has a special > thumbwheel that activates the flip function. It is a <500 ms action to > select > another window on a pick list with a mouse movement of 10mm or less. With > flip 3D the animation alone takes longer than that, besides the extra > mousing > time and motion. > > This is probably not objectionable unless, like me, you work with four or > five major apps (Photoshop, InDesign, Bridge, MS Word, Acrobat) > simultaneously and have to flip back and forth among them repetitively, > many > times an hour. > > I have no objection to the transparency, and it's useful enough that I > would > keep it turned on, but the Flip-3D is so annoying that I have to turn off > Desktop Composition, which seems to eliminate both. (It took some > searching > even to find the definition of "Desktop Composition", since it's not in > the > included Help.) An option to retain one without the other would be > welcome. > > As a note, I realize I am probably in a minority. My preferred "user > experience" (I *hate* that term) has to do only with getting stuff done, > not > how entertaining the UI is -- especially animations that take time with no > practical return. > > ---------------- > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow > this > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then > click "I Agree" in the message pane. > > http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com....vista.general |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Desktop Composition and Flip-3D > Why not just use Alt-Tab instead then for the old functionality rather than > using Win-Tab? If it were a matter of flipping between only two programs, or if I could use only the keyboard, that's what I'd do. Neither is the case. There are several programs involved, so a quick Alt-Tab doesn't cut it. Depending on the particular project, I may spend several hours working exclusively with graphics tablet, mouse and navigator (Logitech NuLOOQ). I don't want to reach for the keyboard if I don't have to, so Win-Tab is also a pain -- especially since there's a quick-flip button built into the mouse. Maybe if I were working with a generic mouse I'd be using Alt-Tab and would never have made my original post, the little flip-wheel on the MX Revolution is so quick, and so transparent, that I guess I'm spoiled. <sermon> <body> Workflow is all about transparency. Things that distract interrupt the flow and disturb concentration. Flip 3-D is a distraction. Moving from mouse/graphics tablet to keyboard (while doing graphics work) is a distraction. Moving from keyboard to mouse (when working on text) is a distraction. Anything that should be instant (like flipping from one window to another) but isn't, is a distraction. Adobe really got this message a few years ago. The reason the Creative Suite has grabbed such a large and increasing share of the design market is that it is supremely workflow oriented: it lets you get more done in less time at higher quality and with fewer distractions. Only the die-hards use Quark Xpress anymore. </body> </sermon> So, no, it's not a matter of Alt-Tab. "Shane Nokes" wrote: > It's still there and works just fine. > > > "Alan G" <AlanG@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:F5282AA5-3C12-48ED-9F1D-490DAE8DE69F@microsoft.com... > >I have not been able to find a way to turn off flip-3D without turning off > > transparency in the Vista UI. > > > > Flip-3D is cute-looking but slows down workflow for two reasons: a) any > > animation takes time, and (mainly) b) the mouse cursor is does not land by > > default on the last-used-window, as the old Alt-Tab does, and it requires > > a > > considerably larger mouse movement to pick a window than to pick from a > > pop-up list. My Logitech super-mouse (the MX Revolution) has a special > > thumbwheel that activates the flip function. It is a <500 ms action to > > select > > another window on a pick list with a mouse movement of 10mm or less. With > > flip 3D the animation alone takes longer than that, besides the extra > > mousing > > time and motion. > > > > This is probably not objectionable unless, like me, you work with four or > > five major apps (Photoshop, InDesign, Bridge, MS Word, Acrobat) > > simultaneously and have to flip back and forth among them repetitively, > > many > > times an hour. > > > > I have no objection to the transparency, and it's useful enough that I > > would > > keep it turned on, but the Flip-3D is so annoying that I have to turn off > > Desktop Composition, which seems to eliminate both. (It took some > > searching > > even to find the definition of "Desktop Composition", since it's not in > > the > > included Help.) An option to retain one without the other would be > > welcome. > > > > As a note, I realize I am probably in a minority. My preferred "user > > experience" (I *hate* that term) has to do only with getting stuff done, > > not > > how entertaining the UI is -- especially animations that take time with no > > practical return. > > > > ---------------- > > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the > > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I > > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow > > this > > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then > > click "I Agree" in the message pane. > > > > http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com....vista.general > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Desktop Composition and Flip-3D Well you also realize that you don't have to use the mouse/keyboard to flip right? You can use the pen to just select the window you want and it will pop to the foreground with no flipping required once Flip3D is activated ![]() "Alan G" <AlanG@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:8487A851-BE9B-4E4F-AADC-6D7724A7F3AF@microsoft.com... >> Why not just use Alt-Tab instead then for the old functionality rather >> than >> using Win-Tab? > > If it were a matter of flipping between only two programs, or if I could > use > only the keyboard, that's what I'd do. Neither is the case. There are > several > programs involved, so a quick Alt-Tab doesn't cut it. Depending on the > particular project, I may spend several hours working exclusively with > graphics tablet, mouse and navigator (Logitech NuLOOQ). I don't want to > reach > for the keyboard if I don't have to, so Win-Tab is also a pain -- > especially > since there's a quick-flip button built into the mouse. Maybe if I were > working with a generic mouse I'd be using Alt-Tab and would never have > made > my original post, the little flip-wheel on the MX Revolution is so quick, > and > so transparent, that I guess I'm spoiled. > > <sermon> > <body> > Workflow is all about transparency. Things that distract interrupt the > flow > and disturb concentration. Flip 3-D is a distraction. Moving from > mouse/graphics tablet to keyboard (while doing graphics work) is a > distraction. Moving from keyboard to mouse (when working on text) is a > distraction. Anything that should be instant (like flipping from one > window > to another) but isn't, is a distraction. > > Adobe really got this message a few years ago. The reason the Creative > Suite > has grabbed such a large and increasing share of the design market is that > it > is supremely workflow oriented: it lets you get more done in less time at > higher quality and with fewer distractions. Only the die-hards use Quark > Xpress anymore. > </body> > </sermon> > > So, no, it's not a matter of Alt-Tab. > > "Shane Nokes" wrote: > >> It's still there and works just fine. >> >> >> "Alan G" <AlanG@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:F5282AA5-3C12-48ED-9F1D-490DAE8DE69F@microsoft.com... >> >I have not been able to find a way to turn off flip-3D without turning >> >off >> > transparency in the Vista UI. >> > >> > Flip-3D is cute-looking but slows down workflow for two reasons: a) any >> > animation takes time, and (mainly) b) the mouse cursor is does not land >> > by >> > default on the last-used-window, as the old Alt-Tab does, and it >> > requires >> > a >> > considerably larger mouse movement to pick a window than to pick from a >> > pop-up list. My Logitech super-mouse (the MX Revolution) has a special >> > thumbwheel that activates the flip function. It is a <500 ms action to >> > select >> > another window on a pick list with a mouse movement of 10mm or less. >> > With >> > flip 3D the animation alone takes longer than that, besides the extra >> > mousing >> > time and motion. >> > >> > This is probably not objectionable unless, like me, you work with four >> > or >> > five major apps (Photoshop, InDesign, Bridge, MS Word, Acrobat) >> > simultaneously and have to flip back and forth among them repetitively, >> > many >> > times an hour. >> > >> > I have no objection to the transparency, and it's useful enough that I >> > would >> > keep it turned on, but the Flip-3D is so annoying that I have to turn >> > off >> > Desktop Composition, which seems to eliminate both. (It took some >> > searching >> > even to find the definition of "Desktop Composition", since it's not in >> > the >> > included Help.) An option to retain one without the other would be >> > welcome. >> > >> > As a note, I realize I am probably in a minority. My preferred "user >> > experience" (I *hate* that term) has to do only with getting stuff >> > done, >> > not >> > how entertaining the UI is -- especially animations that take time with >> > no >> > practical return. >> > >> > ---------------- >> > This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the >> > suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the >> > "I >> > Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow >> > this >> > link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and >> > then >> > click "I Agree" in the message pane. >> > >> > http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com....vista.general >> |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Desktop Composition Setting is disabled | Vista General | |||
| Disable Desktop Composition hotkey? | Vista General | |||
| Desktop Composition | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Enabling desktop composition. | Vista General | |||
| desktop composition | Vista performance & maintenance | |||