![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC A friend with computer problems bought a new e-Machine form Best Buy with Vista Home Basic pre-installed. It's a 3 GHz machine with 512 MB RAM, 160 GB HDD, etc. It is also the slowest machine I've dealt with in a long time! All I have installed is Word 2003 and Quickbooks, set up Outlook Express, and a new printer and a wireless connection using a PCI Adapter, both with Vista drivers. From first turning on the machine it has been very slow. All Windows updates were done. What can I check to find out what is making it so slow - the 7 year old WinXP Gateway it replaced was a speed demon by comparison. Thanks, Mich |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC I would start with increasing the RAM. 512 just isn't enough for Vista, it's the minimum. I would go to 2GBs as optimal or 1GB if money were an issue. I'd also defrag the hard drive. Keith "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message news:eXVHgcPVHHA.4796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >A friend with computer problems bought a new e-Machine form Best Buy with >Vista Home Basic pre-installed. It's a 3 GHz machine with 512 MB RAM, 160 >GB HDD, etc. It is also the slowest machine I've dealt with in a long >time! > > All I have installed is Word 2003 and Quickbooks, set up Outlook Express, > and a new printer and a wireless connection using a PCI Adapter, both with > Vista drivers. From first turning on the machine it has been very slow. > All Windows updates were done. > > What can I check to find out what is making it so slow - the 7 year old > WinXP Gateway it replaced was a speed demon by comparison. > > Thanks, > Mich > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC He has already paid for the machine, so upgrading the RAM immediately isn't an option, but I will try defragmenting it. Would this be a problem though on a one day old (out of the box) machine? "Keith" <kgamard@cox.net> wrote in message news:u03JS1PVHHA.1200@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >I would start with increasing the RAM. > > 512 just isn't enough for Vista, it's the minimum. I would go to 2GBs as > optimal or 1GB if money were an issue. I'd also defrag the hard drive. > > Keith > > "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message > news:eXVHgcPVHHA.4796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>A friend with computer problems bought a new e-Machine form Best Buy with >>Vista Home Basic pre-installed. It's a 3 GHz machine with 512 MB RAM, 160 >>GB HDD, etc. It is also the slowest machine I've dealt with in a long >>time! >> >> All I have installed is Word 2003 and Quickbooks, set up Outlook Express, >> and a new printer and a wireless connection using a PCI Adapter, both >> with Vista drivers. From first turning on the machine it has been very >> slow. All Windows updates were done. >> >> What can I check to find out what is making it so slow - the 7 year old >> WinXP Gateway it replaced was a speed demon by comparison. >> >> Thanks, >> Mich >> >> >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC That machine really needs 1GB of RAM, but I understand your friend's concern. My experience has been after installing an OS and applications (me or someone else), it's always best to defrag the hard drive. Even when I received my Dell last year, I defrag it because I didn't know if the OEM had prior to shipping. Doubtful. :-) Keith "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message news:e9Goy8PVHHA.3980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > He has already paid for the machine, so upgrading the RAM immediately > isn't an option, but I will try defragmenting it. Would this be a problem > though on a one day old (out of the box) machine? > > > "Keith" <kgamard@cox.net> wrote in message > news:u03JS1PVHHA.1200@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>I would start with increasing the RAM. >> >> 512 just isn't enough for Vista, it's the minimum. I would go to 2GBs as >> optimal or 1GB if money were an issue. I'd also defrag the hard drive. >> >> Keith >> >> "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message >> news:eXVHgcPVHHA.4796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>A friend with computer problems bought a new e-Machine form Best Buy with >>>Vista Home Basic pre-installed. It's a 3 GHz machine with 512 MB RAM, >>>160 GB HDD, etc. It is also the slowest machine I've dealt with in a >>>long time! >>> >>> All I have installed is Word 2003 and Quickbooks, set up Outlook >>> Express, and a new printer and a wireless connection using a PCI >>> Adapter, both with Vista drivers. From first turning on the machine it >>> has been very slow. All Windows updates were done. >>> >>> What can I check to find out what is making it so slow - the 7 year old >>> WinXP Gateway it replaced was a speed demon by comparison. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mich >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC BTW... the defragging will help, but I doubt it will fix the slowness you're talking about. RAM will help that immensly! Also, you may want to mention the video card. Hopefully it has the minimum onboard RAM (128mb). Keith "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message news:e9Goy8PVHHA.3980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > He has already paid for the machine, so upgrading the RAM immediately > isn't an option, but I will try defragmenting it. Would this be a problem > though on a one day old (out of the box) machine? > > > "Keith" <kgamard@cox.net> wrote in message > news:u03JS1PVHHA.1200@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>I would start with increasing the RAM. >> >> 512 just isn't enough for Vista, it's the minimum. I would go to 2GBs as >> optimal or 1GB if money were an issue. I'd also defrag the hard drive. >> >> Keith >> >> "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message >> news:eXVHgcPVHHA.4796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>A friend with computer problems bought a new e-Machine form Best Buy with >>>Vista Home Basic pre-installed. It's a 3 GHz machine with 512 MB RAM, >>>160 GB HDD, etc. It is also the slowest machine I've dealt with in a >>>long time! >>> >>> All I have installed is Word 2003 and Quickbooks, set up Outlook >>> Express, and a new printer and a wireless connection using a PCI >>> Adapter, both with Vista drivers. From first turning on the machine it >>> has been very slow. All Windows updates were done. >>> >>> What can I check to find out what is making it so slow - the 7 year old >>> WinXP Gateway it replaced was a speed demon by comparison. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mich >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC I didn't notice the video RAM off hand, but I think it's really bad marketing to sell a machine with the minimum specs. The purchasers are just going to tell everyone else to avoid Gateway e-Machines and Vista because they are too slow. A little more RAM put on by the manufacturer would not have made that much difference to the base price. It's the same with the printer that was bundled with it - there was no USB cable. I bought one for $1.95. I'm sure he would have paid another couple of bucks or more to not have me go back to a store to get that! I'll let you know how the defrag goes after this weekend when I go back to finish everything. Thanks, Mich "Keith" <kgamard@cox.net> wrote in message news:uaQbiEQVHHA.3568@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > BTW... the defragging will help, but I doubt it will fix the slowness > you're talking about. RAM will help that immensly! Also, you may want to > mention the video card. Hopefully it has the minimum onboard RAM (128mb). > > Keith > > "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message > news:e9Goy8PVHHA.3980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> He has already paid for the machine, so upgrading the RAM immediately >> isn't an option, but I will try defragmenting it. Would this be a >> problem though on a one day old (out of the box) machine? >> >> >> "Keith" <kgamard@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:u03JS1PVHHA.1200@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>I would start with increasing the RAM. >>> >>> 512 just isn't enough for Vista, it's the minimum. I would go to 2GBs as >>> optimal or 1GB if money were an issue. I'd also defrag the hard drive. >>> >>> Keith >>> >>> "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message >>> news:eXVHgcPVHHA.4796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>A friend with computer problems bought a new e-Machine form Best Buy >>>>with Vista Home Basic pre-installed. It's a 3 GHz machine with 512 MB >>>>RAM, 160 GB HDD, etc. It is also the slowest machine I've dealt with in >>>>a long time! >>>> >>>> All I have installed is Word 2003 and Quickbooks, set up Outlook >>>> Express, and a new printer and a wireless connection using a PCI >>>> Adapter, both with Vista drivers. From first turning on the machine it >>>> has been very slow. All Windows updates were done. >>>> >>>> What can I check to find out what is making it so slow - the 7 year old >>>> WinXP Gateway it replaced was a speed demon by comparison. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Mich >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC You can try defragging, but even that is often overrated. Make sure there are not unnecessary startup programs running. But as long as it has 512 MB, some slowness may be expected and he should consider doubling the RAM. I have a laptop that runs Vista Ultimate on 512 MB OK, but I still expect better performance when I eventually upgrade RAM. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "M Skabialka" <mskabialka@NOSPAMdrc.com> wrote in message news:e9Goy8PVHHA.3980@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > He has already paid for the machine, so upgrading the RAM immediately > isn't an option, but I will try defragmenting it. Would this be a problem > though on a one day old (out of the box) machine? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC Hi, Just a "shot in the dark", but you might want to check if the drives (under Device Manager->"ATA Channel 0/1"->Advanced Setting) all have DMA enabled (plus the "DMA" checkbox checked)... Jim M Skabialka wrote: > A friend with computer problems bought a new e-Machine form Best Buy with > Vista Home Basic pre-installed. It's a 3 GHz machine with 512 MB RAM, 160 > GB HDD, etc. It is also the slowest machine I've dealt with in a long time! > > All I have installed is Word 2003 and Quickbooks, set up Outlook Express, > and a new printer and a wireless connection using a PCI Adapter, both with > Vista drivers. From first turning on the machine it has been very slow. > All Windows updates were done. > > What can I check to find out what is making it so slow - the 7 year old > WinXP Gateway it replaced was a speed demon by comparison. > > Thanks, > Mich > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC Well, e-Machines have tended to be a tad 'under powered' -- that's what makes them attractive price wise. Two obvious things -- RAM -- what speed is that lame 512M of RAM you have? These days, and with Vista, a reasonable entry point is 1G of DDR2 533 RAM configured as a matched pair of 512M. Video -- if I had to guess, the video is a motherboard embedded video (perhaps ATX X200 or a similar low end nVidia chip). This is going to make things slow for two reasons. First, the memory for video is being thefted from that 512M you start with -- going to 1G and faster memory will help a lot here, second, it is an embedded video adapter and so will not have fast processing capabilities there. That 7 year Gateway, just how did you get XP on it in 2000???? -- Barry Schnur |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Vista Home Basic is VERY slow on a new PC > I didn't notice the video RAM off hand, but I think it's really bad > marketing to sell a machine with the minimum specs. The trick is that they can sell the system as a 'Vista system' at $399 or maybe $499. The thing is, a decently configured 'Vista system' really should go for around $600 for starters, assuming 2G of RAM, a decent CPU (for low end I'd go with an AMD 3800X2), and a separate video adapter with 128M of RAM on the adapter (say an ATI X550). -- Barry Schnur |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Slow Software Installation - VISTA HOME BASIC 32 | Software | |||
| ip4200: Vista Home Basic Fails, but Home premium works | Vista print fax & scan | |||
| How do I diagnose a slow Vista Home Basic machine? | Vista General | |||
| Slow Shutdown in new windows vista home basic | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| windows vista upgrade vs home preuim vs home basic | Vista hardware & devices | |||