![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | MSFT in the US Supreme Court MSFT vs. AT&T (05-1056) 2/21/07) The case is Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp., 05-1056 and oral argument was 2/21/07 Wednesday. MSFT litigates constantly,but this is probably their first case that reached the US Supreme Court: http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletyp..._hear_f_2.html http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/...money/msft.php February 21, 2007 High Court Skeptical of Microsoft Patent Ruling By REUTERS Filed at 2:12 p.m. ET WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday expressed doubts about whether Microsoft Corp. (MSFT.O) should be liable for infringing AT&T Inc.patents in Windows software sold overseas, a case that could determine the reach of American patents in foreign markets. Hearing arguments in the case, the justices sharply questioned AT&T's assertion that software code could be deemed a ``component'' of a computer, which would make overseas sales of the software an infringement under U.S. patent law. Two justices expressed concern that a ruling against Microsoft could unintentionally subject other products sold overseas to U.S. patent law. Justice Stephen Breyer said he would be ``quite frightened of deciding for you and discovering that all over the world there are vast numbers of inventions that really can be thought of in the same way that you're thinking of this one.'' The Microsoft-AT&T dispute is one of a series of important patent cases now before the court. At issue is a ruling last year upholding a lower court decision that Microsoft was liable for infringing an AT&T patent for converting speech into computer code in copies of the Windows computer operating system sold overseas. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said the world's largest software maker was liable for the unauthorized distribution of codec technology, used to compress speech signals into data, in copies of Windows overseas. The U.S. Justice Department has sided with much of Microsoft's argument and said the appeals court ruling ''improperly extends United States patent law to foreign markets'' and puts U.S. software companies at a competitive disadvantage. ____________________________________ Thursday, February 22, 2007 Justices question AT&T arguments in dispute with Microsoft By ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON (AP) - A lawyer for AT&T Corp. argued before a skeptical Supreme Court on Wednesday that Microsoft Corp. is violating one of its patents when it sends its Windows software overseas to be copied and placed on personal computers. Microsoft acknowledged that it violated AT&T's patent on speech encoding technology when it sold Windows in the United States, but disputes that it should be held responsible for infringement when the software is copied by foreign manufacturers. Justice Stephen Breyer expressed some sympathy for Microsoft's argument, suggesting AT&T should pursue its infringement complaint in overseas markets where the copies are made. ''The whole question here is whether (the company) has to get a patent'' abroad, Breyer said. At issue in the dispute is a section of patent law that bars companies from shipping components of a patented invention overseas for assembly. The intent of the provision, which became law in 1984, was to prevent companies from circumventing patents by sending parts offshore to assemble them in a way that would infringe the patent in the United States. Two lower federal courts ruled in favor of AT&T. The Supreme Court is expected to decide the case by July. AT&T's lawyer, Seth P. Waxman, argued that the patent law ''does not reach what anybody does overseas.'' Instead, Waxman said, Microsoft violated the law when it sent its software from the United States to other countries to be ''installed and stored in foreign computers.'' Microsoft's lawyer, Theodore B. Olson, countered that the company's software is not a component until it is placed on a computer's hard drive or optical disc and can actually be used by a computer. ''It is our position that the only components in this case are the physical manifestations'' of the software, Olson said. It is the foreign manufacturer that produces those components, he added, not Microsoft, which only sends a master version of its software overseas. Chief Justice John Roberts did not participate in the oral argument. Roberts owns shares of Microsoft, according to the court's financial disclosure forms. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: MSFT in the US Supreme Court MSFT vs. AT&T (05-1056) 2/21/07) > Microsoft's lawyer, Theodore B. Olson... Everyone should remember him! The darling of the lunatic right who paved the way for the supreme court to appoint Bush president. Well MS is stupid, they got the 'right' man for the job. If only their software engineering antennae was as astute as their politicial one. Note his wife, the notorious republican attack dog, was on the 9/11 plane that crashed in Pa. That is sad. www.beyondsql.blogspot.com |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: MSFT in the US Supreme Court MSFT vs. AT&T (05-1056) 2/21/07) On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:44:13 -0500, "Steve Dassin" <rac4sqlnospam@net> spake thusly: >> Microsoft's lawyer, Theodore B. Olson... > >Everyone should remember him! The darling of the lunatic right who >paved the way for the supreme court to appoint Bush president. >Well MS is stupid, they got the 'right' man for the job. If only their >software engineering antennae was as astute as their politicial one. > >Note his wife, the notorious republican attack dog, was on the 9/11 >plane that crashed in Pa. That is sad. Given a choice I'd have rather it had been Ann Coulter instead. -- Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: MSFT in the US Supreme Court MSFT vs. AT&T (05-1056) 2/21/07) Ted Olson was chosen by MSFT's VP and General Counsel Brad Smith for two reasons: He has by virtue of having been the Bush Solicitor General many previous apprearances before the S. Ct. He has a social relationship with Clarence Thomas --i.e. Clarence Thomas, one of the most unqualified individuals ever to get in the S. Ct. building let alone (appointed to the Court by Bush the father of the current moronic devil whose sole contribution has been to stimulate death into Dover Coffins and medical deaths in the thousands with his health care quagmire that denies medicine to the elderly and cuts funding for sick children in 1990). Another MSFT sponsered web site--a good one, Slate, lets you know that Ted Olson is one of the chairmen of the "Raise money for Scooter as he scoots to prison to pay his multimillion dollar legal team" http://www.slate.com/id/2136889/ Ahmm Scootin to Prison as One of the Dumbest Harvard Law Grads ever--Dick Cheney's employee Cathie Martin, a fellow Harvard law grad and wife of the notoriously Bush Rubber Stamp Keith Martin, chairman of the screw the consumer Republican dominated FCC helped send me there. http://www.scooterlibby.com/ Ted Olson has done much to get Allito and Roberts who will do everything they can for the next 40 or so years to screw the little guy, the consumer, and the mediclaly in need. Just read the stupidly narrow ruling in the Phillip Morris opinion that was handed down Tuesday. Philip Morris USA v. Williams, No. 05-1256, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/wa...=1&oref=slogin Will these scumbags grant Libby a pardon? It would have to be damn fast if it's Fitzgerald's attention to flip LIbby as the main snitch to go after Cheney as he should. You won't see Ted Olson's fund raising efforts among fat cat arch conservatives for the Federal Defender Program. It's only targeted at Libby who inherited many millions of dollars from his dad. You won't see Libby's cry baby lawyer in a case like this unless you show him millions of dollars to assemble a legal team including expensive investigation in contrast to many states whose court appointed defenders cannot afford to mount defenses for their clients. CH "Steve Dassin" <rac4sqlnospam@net> wrote in message news:u$y8XSlVHHA.4964@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Microsoft's lawyer, Theodore B. Olson... > > Everyone should remember him! The darling of the lunatic right who > paved the way for the supreme court to appoint Bush president. > Well MS is stupid, they got the 'right' man for the job. If only their > software engineering antennae was as astute as their politicial one. > > Note his wife, the notorious republican attack dog, was on the 9/11 > plane that crashed in Pa. That is sad. > > www.beyondsql.blogspot.com > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: MSFT in the US Supreme Court MSFT vs. AT&T (05-1056) 2/21/07) I meant 'Well MS isn't stupid...atleast potitically ![]() You seem educated, insightful and can connect dotes. What are you doing on an MS forum? - ![]() Keep up the good fight, P.S. Do you remember Barabara Olson? She was a piece of work. best, steve "Chad Harris" <vistaneedsmuchowork.net> wrote in message news:OyPYqhpVHHA.5100@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Ted Olson was chosen by MSFT's VP and General Counsel Brad Smith for two > reasons: > > He has by virtue of having been the Bush Solicitor General many previous > apprearances before the S. Ct. > He has a social relationship with Clarence Thomas --i.e. Clarence Thomas, > one of the most unqualified individuals ever to get in the S. Ct. building > let alone (appointed to the Court by Bush the father of the current > moronic devil whose sole contribution has been to stimulate death into > Dover Coffins and medical deaths in the thousands with his health care > quagmire that denies medicine to the elderly and cuts funding for sick > children in 1990). > > Another MSFT sponsered web site--a good one, Slate, lets you know that > Ted Olson is one of the chairmen of the "Raise money for Scooter as he > scoots to prison to pay his multimillion dollar legal team" > > http://www.slate.com/id/2136889/ > > Ahmm Scootin to Prison as One of the Dumbest Harvard Law Grads ever--Dick > Cheney's employee Cathie Martin, a fellow Harvard law grad and wife of the > notoriously Bush Rubber Stamp Keith Martin, chairman of the screw the > consumer Republican dominated FCC helped send me there. > http://www.scooterlibby.com/ > > Ted Olson has done much to get Allito and Roberts who will do everything > they can for the next 40 or so years to screw the little guy, the > consumer, and the mediclaly in need. Just read the stupidly narrow ruling > in the Phillip Morris opinion that was handed down Tuesday. > > Philip Morris USA v. Williams, No. 05-1256, > > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/wa...=1&oref=slogin > > Will these scumbags grant Libby a pardon? It would have to be damn fast if > it's Fitzgerald's attention to flip LIbby as the main snitch to go after > Cheney as he should. > > You won't see Ted Olson's fund raising efforts among fat cat arch > conservatives for the Federal Defender Program. It's only targeted at > Libby who inherited many millions of dollars from his dad. > > You won't see Libby's cry baby lawyer in a case like this unless you show > him millions of dollars to assemble a legal team including expensive > investigation in contrast to many states whose court appointed defenders > cannot afford to mount defenses for their clients. > > CH > > "Steve Dassin" <rac4sqlnospam@net> wrote in message > news:u$y8XSlVHHA.4964@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> Microsoft's lawyer, Theodore B. Olson... >> >> Everyone should remember him! The darling of the lunatic right who >> paved the way for the supreme court to appoint Bush president. >> Well MS is stupid, they got the 'right' man for the job. If only their >> software engineering antennae was as astute as their politicial one. >> >> Note his wife, the notorious republican attack dog, was on the 9/11 >> plane that crashed in Pa. That is sad. >> >> www.beyondsql.blogspot.com >> >> > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: MSFT in the US Supreme Court MSFT vs. AT&T (05-1056) 2/21/07) Steve-- I remember Barbara Olson. She was a chip off the ole dumb as a rock Anne Coulter and a quintissential shallow Right Wing Republican woman for a rigid screw the non-affluent Ted Olson. His closest friends included two people who should be working in the back of a burger chef instead of in appellate law--even though his right wing zealot law clerks do almost all his writing--Clarence Thomas--(and his wife, Ginny Thomas. Thomas is Scalia's trained for 99% obedience puppy dog. There are few quality appellate law firms who would hire Thomas to sweep the floor. She was on her way to the Bill Maher show from DC to LA to spout some of her stupid Victoria Tensinguesque inanities when the incompetency of the Bush administration allowed her plane to be interrupted. MSFT was stupid politically when they hired Ralph Reed who is a heart beat away from his former best friend Jack Abramoff and would have been prosecuted if the State's Attorney in Texas hadn't been so stupid as to let the statute of limitations run. If the current DOJ weren't having Saturday Nite Masaquers of US Attorneys who prosecute in areas they don't want prosecuted, Reed would have been convicted long ago in Federal court. MSFT paid Reed a few million dollars, only firing him when the connection hit the Seattle media and Reed's activities were profiled. Do a google with terms like Microsoft Ralph Reed Mariana Islands and see what comes up. A former White House employee named Susan Ralston should have been convicted long ago, but although he had no significant experience whatsoever in federal litigation and couldn't write an appellate brief to save his ass Gonzales runs DOJ a lot more ruthlessly than Tony Soprano runs his homies. http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001747.php CH "Steve Dassin" <steve@nospamrac4sql.net> wrote in message news:u6xy3PrVHHA.2256@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >I meant 'Well MS isn't stupid...atleast potitically ![]() > > You seem educated, insightful and can connect dotes. > What are you doing on an MS forum? - ![]() > > Keep up the good fight, > P.S. Do you remember Barabara Olson? She was a piece of work. > > best, > steve > > "Chad Harris" <vistaneedsmuchowork.net> wrote in message > news:OyPYqhpVHHA.5100@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Ted Olson was chosen by MSFT's VP and General Counsel Brad Smith for two >> reasons: >> >> He has by virtue of having been the Bush Solicitor General many previous >> apprearances before the S. Ct. >> He has a social relationship with Clarence Thomas --i.e. Clarence Thomas, >> one of the most unqualified individuals ever to get in the S. Ct. >> building let alone (appointed to the Court by Bush the father of the >> current moronic devil whose sole contribution has been to stimulate >> death into Dover Coffins and medical deaths in the thousands with his >> health care quagmire that denies medicine to the elderly and cuts funding >> for sick children in 1990). >> >> Another MSFT sponsered web site--a good one, Slate, lets you know that >> Ted Olson is one of the chairmen of the "Raise money for Scooter as he >> scoots to prison to pay his multimillion dollar legal team" >> >> http://www.slate.com/id/2136889/ >> >> Ahmm Scootin to Prison as One of the Dumbest Harvard Law Grads ever--Dick >> Cheney's employee Cathie Martin, a fellow Harvard law grad and wife of >> the notoriously Bush Rubber Stamp Keith Martin, chairman of the screw the >> consumer Republican dominated FCC helped send me there. >> http://www.scooterlibby.com/ >> >> Ted Olson has done much to get Allito and Roberts who will do everything >> they can for the next 40 or so years to screw the little guy, the >> consumer, and the mediclaly in need. Just read the stupidly narrow >> ruling in the Phillip Morris opinion that was handed down Tuesday. >> >> Philip Morris USA v. Williams, No. 05-1256, >> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/wa...=1&oref=slogin >> >> Will these scumbags grant Libby a pardon? It would have to be damn fast >> if it's Fitzgerald's attention to flip LIbby as the main snitch to go >> after Cheney as he should. >> >> You won't see Ted Olson's fund raising efforts among fat cat arch >> conservatives for the Federal Defender Program. It's only targeted at >> Libby who inherited many millions of dollars from his dad. >> >> You won't see Libby's cry baby lawyer in a case like this unless you >> show him millions of dollars to assemble a legal team including expensive >> investigation in contrast to many states whose court appointed defenders >> cannot afford to mount defenses for their clients. >> >> CH >> >> "Steve Dassin" <rac4sqlnospam@net> wrote in message >> news:u$y8XSlVHHA.4964@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> Microsoft's lawyer, Theodore B. Olson... >>> >>> Everyone should remember him! The darling of the lunatic right who >>> paved the way for the supreme court to appoint Bush president. >>> Well MS is stupid, they got the 'right' man for the job. If only their >>> software engineering antennae was as astute as their politicial one. >>> >>> Note his wife, the notorious republican attack dog, was on the 9/11 >>> plane that crashed in Pa. That is sad. >>> >>> www.beyondsql.blogspot.com >>> >>> >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: MSFT in the US Supreme Court MSFT vs. AT&T (05-1056) 2/21/07) On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:45:02 -0500, "Chad Harris" <vistaneedsmuchowork.net> spake thusly: [.......] >Another MSFT sponsered web site--a good one, Slate...... Slate no longer has any affiliation with Microsoft since they sold it to the Washington Post Company. You'll note there's no "MSN" anything on the site these days. -- Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| MSFT participation | Live Mail | |||
| MSFT Loses another big one in District Court | Vista installation & setup | |||
| MSFT Loses another big one in District Court | Vista General | |||
| Microcomics by MSFT | Vista General | |||