![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Anyone running Vista Business in a Domain yet? I am a network admin of 2 large domains. I haven't got a copy of business yet but I have Home Premium on my new laptop. I am pretty scared about trying to support both Vista and XP in the same domain because for some reason Microsoft decided that "different" has to be "better" and changed all the folder locations. I use Mandatory Roaming Profiles. I DON'T WANT my users to see their profiles folder because everything in it Deletes when they logoff and if they save there it is gone. However, instead of My Documents (what was wrong with My Documents???) they have the entire Profiles folder on the Desktop instead??? The BIG problem with this is that I can't create a Shortcut to My Documents because each user has a different location. Is there no more My Documents Redirection? I have 3000 users and don't want regular roaming profiles as I change the mandatory profile depending on what software they need access to. Please tell me Business is more like XP. Also, what is up with all the extra "clicking" needed in Vista. It seems that they have added at least 2 clicks to every task. Eg. Changing Permissions was only one window, now you have to click "edit" twice. Also, where are all the shortcuts? Can't say I am impressed. I like the new bells and whistles but I think XP is far superior as far as supporting and productivity. Lara |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone running Vista Business in a Domain yet? No Business is just like everything else, though I don't think the documents are on Desktop, they are under c:\users\username\documents The program TweakVI let's you re-direct all the different folders, so I'm sure there is a way to do it. "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:25B509D7-1F9C-4D7C-A82E-B25ADBAB131C@microsoft.com... >I am a network admin of 2 large domains. I haven't got a copy of business >yet > but I have Home Premium on my new laptop. > > I am pretty scared about trying to support both Vista and XP in the same > domain because for some reason Microsoft decided that "different" has to > be > "better" and changed all the folder locations. > > I use Mandatory Roaming Profiles. I DON'T WANT my users to see their > profiles folder because everything in it Deletes when they logoff and if > they > save there it is gone. However, instead of My Documents (what was wrong > with > My Documents???) they have the entire Profiles folder on the Desktop > instead??? > > The BIG problem with this is that I can't create a Shortcut to My > Documents > because each user has a different location. > > Is there no more My Documents Redirection? I have 3000 users and don't > want > regular roaming profiles as I change the mandatory profile depending on > what > software they need access to. > > Please tell me Business is more like XP. > > Also, what is up with all the extra "clicking" needed in Vista. It seems > that they have added at least 2 clicks to every task. Eg. Changing > Permissions was only one window, now you have to click "edit" twice. > Also, > where are all the shortcuts? > > Can't say I am impressed. I like the new bells and whistles but I think XP > is far superior as far as supporting and productivity. > > Lara |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone running Vista Business in a Domain yet? "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:25B509D7-1F9C-4D7C-A82E-B25ADBAB131C@microsoft.com... >I am a network admin of 2 large domains. I haven't got a copy of business >yet > but I have Home Premium on my new laptop. > > I am pretty scared about trying to support both Vista and XP in the same > domain because for some reason Microsoft decided that "different" has to > be > "better" and changed all the folder locations. > > I use Mandatory Roaming Profiles. I DON'T WANT my users to see their > profiles folder because everything in it Deletes when they logoff and if > they > save there it is gone. However, instead of My Documents (what was wrong > with > My Documents???) they have the entire Profiles folder on the Desktop > instead??? > > The BIG problem with this is that I can't create a Shortcut to My > Documents > because each user has a different location. > > Is there no more My Documents Redirection? I have 3000 users and don't > want > regular roaming profiles as I change the mandatory profile depending on > what > software they need access to. > > Please tell me Business is more like XP. > > Also, what is up with all the extra "clicking" needed in Vista. It seems > that they have added at least 2 clicks to every task. Eg. Changing > Permissions was only one window, now you have to click "edit" twice. > Also, > where are all the shortcuts? > > Can't say I am impressed. I like the new bells and whistles but I think XP > is far superior as far as supporting and productivity. > > Lara You use group policies just like XP. Vista has many more policies but the principle is the same. http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true -- Kerry Brown Microsoft MVP - Shell/User http://www.vistahelp.ca |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone running Vista Business in a Domain yet? Hi, I am very familiar with Group Policies. My problem is that I have 2500 Users and if there is no My Documents on the Desktop they are going to go crazy. The Mandatory profiles stops them from saving anything in their Profiles folder because I don't want them to be able to modify anything there. Therefore their Pictures, favorites etc and everything are part of My Documents. I can think of no reason why Microsoft would take away the My Documents and the Documents and Settings structure. It makes no sense. They had it all in one location with everything including All Users in one place. Now they have move All Users desktop and All Users Start Menu to two complete different folders (one of which is hidden). They give users "view" access to their entire Profile Folder structure which is my biggest problem. At home it is annoying because I just want to open My Documents and have to look through 25 folders in my profile folder just to see Documents. What I want to know is in a working domain how do Network Admins handle the fact that with XP there is a My Documents and with Vista there is not? It is like they went backwards to the days of NT. Lara "Kerry Brown" wrote: > "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:25B509D7-1F9C-4D7C-A82E-B25ADBAB131C@microsoft.com... > >I am a network admin of 2 large domains. I haven't got a copy of business > >yet > > but I have Home Premium on my new laptop. > > > > I am pretty scared about trying to support both Vista and XP in the same > > domain because for some reason Microsoft decided that "different" has to > > be > > "better" and changed all the folder locations. > > > > I use Mandatory Roaming Profiles. I DON'T WANT my users to see their > > profiles folder because everything in it Deletes when they logoff and if > > they > > save there it is gone. However, instead of My Documents (what was wrong > > with > > My Documents???) they have the entire Profiles folder on the Desktop > > instead??? > > > > The BIG problem with this is that I can't create a Shortcut to My > > Documents > > because each user has a different location. > > > > Is there no more My Documents Redirection? I have 3000 users and don't > > want > > regular roaming profiles as I change the mandatory profile depending on > > what > > software they need access to. > > > > Please tell me Business is more like XP. > > > > Also, what is up with all the extra "clicking" needed in Vista. It seems > > that they have added at least 2 clicks to every task. Eg. Changing > > Permissions was only one window, now you have to click "edit" twice. > > Also, > > where are all the shortcuts? > > > > Can't say I am impressed. I like the new bells and whistles but I think XP > > is far superior as far as supporting and productivity. > > > > Lara > > > You use group policies just like XP. Vista has many more policies but the > principle is the same. > > http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true > > -- > Kerry Brown > Microsoft MVP - Shell/User > http://www.vistahelp.ca > > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone running Vista Business in a Domain yet? Yes, the UI is different in Vista. I actually like it much better. I find it much more organized but that's just a personal opinion. You control where the files are actually stored, offline files, etc with group policy exactly as you always did. The UI will have to be learned. I do feel your pain as I know how resistant users can be to change but from a management point of view the only real difference is the UI and user education. Vista is actually much safer in a large environment. With UAC and locked down ACLs for important file locations it's way harder for end users to mess things up. -- Kerry Brown Microsoft MVP - Shell/User http://www.vistahelp.ca "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E34341B2-8FB9-44E8-B056-CEDF64164B68@microsoft.com... > Hi, > > I am very familiar with Group Policies. My problem is that I have 2500 > Users > and if there is no My Documents on the Desktop they are going to go crazy. > The Mandatory profiles stops them from saving anything in their Profiles > folder because I don't want them to be able to modify anything there. > Therefore their Pictures, favorites etc and everything are part of My > Documents. > > I can think of no reason why Microsoft would take away the My Documents > and > the Documents and Settings structure. It makes no sense. They had it all > in > one location with everything including All Users in one place. Now they > have > move All Users desktop and All Users Start Menu to two complete different > folders (one of which is hidden). They give users "view" access to their > entire Profile Folder structure which is my biggest problem. > > At home it is annoying because I just want to open My Documents and have > to > look through 25 folders in my profile folder just to see Documents. > > What I want to know is in a working domain how do Network Admins handle > the > fact that with XP there is a My Documents and with Vista there is not? It > is > like they went backwards to the days of NT. > > Lara > > "Kerry Brown" wrote: > >> "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:25B509D7-1F9C-4D7C-A82E-B25ADBAB131C@microsoft.com... >> >I am a network admin of 2 large domains. I haven't got a copy of >> >business >> >yet >> > but I have Home Premium on my new laptop. >> > >> > I am pretty scared about trying to support both Vista and XP in the >> > same >> > domain because for some reason Microsoft decided that "different" has >> > to >> > be >> > "better" and changed all the folder locations. >> > >> > I use Mandatory Roaming Profiles. I DON'T WANT my users to see their >> > profiles folder because everything in it Deletes when they logoff and >> > if >> > they >> > save there it is gone. However, instead of My Documents (what was wrong >> > with >> > My Documents???) they have the entire Profiles folder on the Desktop >> > instead??? >> > >> > The BIG problem with this is that I can't create a Shortcut to My >> > Documents >> > because each user has a different location. >> > >> > Is there no more My Documents Redirection? I have 3000 users and don't >> > want >> > regular roaming profiles as I change the mandatory profile depending on >> > what >> > software they need access to. >> > >> > Please tell me Business is more like XP. >> > >> > Also, what is up with all the extra "clicking" needed in Vista. It >> > seems >> > that they have added at least 2 clicks to every task. Eg. Changing >> > Permissions was only one window, now you have to click "edit" twice. >> > Also, >> > where are all the shortcuts? >> > >> > Can't say I am impressed. I like the new bells and whistles but I think >> > XP >> > is far superior as far as supporting and productivity. >> > >> > Lara >> >> >> You use group policies just like XP. Vista has many more policies but the >> principle is the same. >> >> http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true >> >> -- >> Kerry Brown >> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User >> http://www.vistahelp.ca >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone running Vista Business in a Domain yet? I just read in the Manual that Vista won't support XP roaming profiles. This is the first MS OS that isn't backwards compatable. As I run XP/2000 mandatory Profiles for my 2500 Users who roam all over the network on a daily basis we won't be able to install Vista until all our machines can run it which will be about 4 years from now as I still have P3's. Folder Redirection is their "solution" but that won't work because it is the user.man where I have a lot of their settings and I put all my shortcuts in My Network Places for shared folders. Luckily we have a Select License that allows us to install XP on a Vista license. Cheers, Lara "Kerry Brown" wrote: > Yes, the UI is different in Vista. I actually like it much better. I find it > much more organized but that's just a personal opinion. You control where > the files are actually stored, offline files, etc with group policy exactly > as you always did. The UI will have to be learned. I do feel your pain as I > know how resistant users can be to change but from a management point of > view the only real difference is the UI and user education. Vista is > actually much safer in a large environment. With UAC and locked down ACLs > for important file locations it's way harder for end users to mess things > up. > > -- > Kerry Brown > Microsoft MVP - Shell/User > http://www.vistahelp.ca > > > "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:E34341B2-8FB9-44E8-B056-CEDF64164B68@microsoft.com... > > Hi, > > > > I am very familiar with Group Policies. My problem is that I have 2500 > > Users > > and if there is no My Documents on the Desktop they are going to go crazy. > > The Mandatory profiles stops them from saving anything in their Profiles > > folder because I don't want them to be able to modify anything there. > > Therefore their Pictures, favorites etc and everything are part of My > > Documents. > > > > I can think of no reason why Microsoft would take away the My Documents > > and > > the Documents and Settings structure. It makes no sense. They had it all > > in > > one location with everything including All Users in one place. Now they > > have > > move All Users desktop and All Users Start Menu to two complete different > > folders (one of which is hidden). They give users "view" access to their > > entire Profile Folder structure which is my biggest problem. > > > > At home it is annoying because I just want to open My Documents and have > > to > > look through 25 folders in my profile folder just to see Documents. > > > > What I want to know is in a working domain how do Network Admins handle > > the > > fact that with XP there is a My Documents and with Vista there is not? It > > is > > like they went backwards to the days of NT. > > > > Lara > > > > "Kerry Brown" wrote: > > > >> "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:25B509D7-1F9C-4D7C-A82E-B25ADBAB131C@microsoft.com... > >> >I am a network admin of 2 large domains. I haven't got a copy of > >> >business > >> >yet > >> > but I have Home Premium on my new laptop. > >> > > >> > I am pretty scared about trying to support both Vista and XP in the > >> > same > >> > domain because for some reason Microsoft decided that "different" has > >> > to > >> > be > >> > "better" and changed all the folder locations. > >> > > >> > I use Mandatory Roaming Profiles. I DON'T WANT my users to see their > >> > profiles folder because everything in it Deletes when they logoff and > >> > if > >> > they > >> > save there it is gone. However, instead of My Documents (what was wrong > >> > with > >> > My Documents???) they have the entire Profiles folder on the Desktop > >> > instead??? > >> > > >> > The BIG problem with this is that I can't create a Shortcut to My > >> > Documents > >> > because each user has a different location. > >> > > >> > Is there no more My Documents Redirection? I have 3000 users and don't > >> > want > >> > regular roaming profiles as I change the mandatory profile depending on > >> > what > >> > software they need access to. > >> > > >> > Please tell me Business is more like XP. > >> > > >> > Also, what is up with all the extra "clicking" needed in Vista. It > >> > seems > >> > that they have added at least 2 clicks to every task. Eg. Changing > >> > Permissions was only one window, now you have to click "edit" twice. > >> > Also, > >> > where are all the shortcuts? > >> > > >> > Can't say I am impressed. I like the new bells and whistles but I think > >> > XP > >> > is far superior as far as supporting and productivity. > >> > > >> > Lara > >> > >> > >> You use group policies just like XP. Vista has many more policies but the > >> principle is the same. > >> > >> http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true > >> > >> -- > >> Kerry Brown > >> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User > >> http://www.vistahelp.ca > >> > >> > >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone running Vista Business in a Domain yet? You're sort of right. I hadn't played with roaming profiles and switching back and forth between XP and Vista. It looks like it can be done but there are a few compromises and it's a bit of work. http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true -- Kerry Brown Microsoft MVP - Shell/User http://www.vistahelp.ca "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:63B4A896-7BF0-40E1-8C14-873DEF434FC6@microsoft.com... >I just read in the Manual that Vista won't support XP roaming profiles. >This > is the first MS OS that isn't backwards compatable. As I run XP/2000 > mandatory Profiles for my 2500 Users who roam all over the network on a > daily > basis we won't be able to install Vista until all our machines can run it > which will be about 4 years from now as I still have P3's. > > Folder Redirection is their "solution" but that won't work because it is > the > user.man where I have a lot of their settings and I put all my shortcuts > in > My Network Places for shared folders. > > Luckily we have a Select License that allows us to install XP on a Vista > license. > > Cheers, > Lara > > "Kerry Brown" wrote: > >> Yes, the UI is different in Vista. I actually like it much better. I find >> it >> much more organized but that's just a personal opinion. You control where >> the files are actually stored, offline files, etc with group policy >> exactly >> as you always did. The UI will have to be learned. I do feel your pain as >> I >> know how resistant users can be to change but from a management point of >> view the only real difference is the UI and user education. Vista is >> actually much safer in a large environment. With UAC and locked down ACLs >> for important file locations it's way harder for end users to mess things >> up. >> >> -- >> Kerry Brown >> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User >> http://www.vistahelp.ca >> >> >> "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:E34341B2-8FB9-44E8-B056-CEDF64164B68@microsoft.com... >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am very familiar with Group Policies. My problem is that I have 2500 >> > Users >> > and if there is no My Documents on the Desktop they are going to go >> > crazy. >> > The Mandatory profiles stops them from saving anything in their >> > Profiles >> > folder because I don't want them to be able to modify anything there. >> > Therefore their Pictures, favorites etc and everything are part of My >> > Documents. >> > >> > I can think of no reason why Microsoft would take away the My Documents >> > and >> > the Documents and Settings structure. It makes no sense. They had it >> > all >> > in >> > one location with everything including All Users in one place. Now they >> > have >> > move All Users desktop and All Users Start Menu to two complete >> > different >> > folders (one of which is hidden). They give users "view" access to >> > their >> > entire Profile Folder structure which is my biggest problem. >> > >> > At home it is annoying because I just want to open My Documents and >> > have >> > to >> > look through 25 folders in my profile folder just to see Documents. >> > >> > What I want to know is in a working domain how do Network Admins handle >> > the >> > fact that with XP there is a My Documents and with Vista there is not? >> > It >> > is >> > like they went backwards to the days of NT. >> > >> > Lara >> > >> > "Kerry Brown" wrote: >> > >> >> "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> >> news:25B509D7-1F9C-4D7C-A82E-B25ADBAB131C@microsoft.com... >> >> >I am a network admin of 2 large domains. I haven't got a copy of >> >> >business >> >> >yet >> >> > but I have Home Premium on my new laptop. >> >> > >> >> > I am pretty scared about trying to support both Vista and XP in the >> >> > same >> >> > domain because for some reason Microsoft decided that "different" >> >> > has >> >> > to >> >> > be >> >> > "better" and changed all the folder locations. >> >> > >> >> > I use Mandatory Roaming Profiles. I DON'T WANT my users to see their >> >> > profiles folder because everything in it Deletes when they logoff >> >> > and >> >> > if >> >> > they >> >> > save there it is gone. However, instead of My Documents (what was >> >> > wrong >> >> > with >> >> > My Documents???) they have the entire Profiles folder on the Desktop >> >> > instead??? >> >> > >> >> > The BIG problem with this is that I can't create a Shortcut to My >> >> > Documents >> >> > because each user has a different location. >> >> > >> >> > Is there no more My Documents Redirection? I have 3000 users and >> >> > don't >> >> > want >> >> > regular roaming profiles as I change the mandatory profile depending >> >> > on >> >> > what >> >> > software they need access to. >> >> > >> >> > Please tell me Business is more like XP. >> >> > >> >> > Also, what is up with all the extra "clicking" needed in Vista. It >> >> > seems >> >> > that they have added at least 2 clicks to every task. Eg. Changing >> >> > Permissions was only one window, now you have to click "edit" twice. >> >> > Also, >> >> > where are all the shortcuts? >> >> > >> >> > Can't say I am impressed. I like the new bells and whistles but I >> >> > think >> >> > XP >> >> > is far superior as far as supporting and productivity. >> >> > >> >> > Lara >> >> >> >> >> >> You use group policies just like XP. Vista has many more policies but >> >> the >> >> principle is the same. >> >> >> >> http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Kerry Brown >> >> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User >> >> http://www.vistahelp.ca >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone running Vista Business in a Domain yet? Hi, Thanks Kerry. I did have that Document on my computer but I only read the end where it says Vista won't load XP Profiles. I went back and re-read it and it says that Vista is smart enough to find the "version 2" of the profile. That means I will have to duplicate the profiles and have one for Vista and one for XP but that is easily done as I use Mandatory anyway. Cheers, Lara "Kerry Brown" wrote: > You're sort of right. I hadn't played with roaming profiles and switching > back and forth between XP and Vista. It looks like it can be done but there > are a few compromises and it's a bit of work. > > http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true > > -- > Kerry Brown > Microsoft MVP - Shell/User > http://www.vistahelp.ca > > > "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:63B4A896-7BF0-40E1-8C14-873DEF434FC6@microsoft.com... > >I just read in the Manual that Vista won't support XP roaming profiles. > >This > > is the first MS OS that isn't backwards compatable. As I run XP/2000 > > mandatory Profiles for my 2500 Users who roam all over the network on a > > daily > > basis we won't be able to install Vista until all our machines can run it > > which will be about 4 years from now as I still have P3's. > > > > Folder Redirection is their "solution" but that won't work because it is > > the > > user.man where I have a lot of their settings and I put all my shortcuts > > in > > My Network Places for shared folders. > > > > Luckily we have a Select License that allows us to install XP on a Vista > > license. > > > > Cheers, > > Lara > > > > "Kerry Brown" wrote: > > > >> Yes, the UI is different in Vista. I actually like it much better. I find > >> it > >> much more organized but that's just a personal opinion. You control where > >> the files are actually stored, offline files, etc with group policy > >> exactly > >> as you always did. The UI will have to be learned. I do feel your pain as > >> I > >> know how resistant users can be to change but from a management point of > >> view the only real difference is the UI and user education. Vista is > >> actually much safer in a large environment. With UAC and locked down ACLs > >> for important file locations it's way harder for end users to mess things > >> up. > >> > >> -- > >> Kerry Brown > >> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User > >> http://www.vistahelp.ca > >> > >> > >> "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:E34341B2-8FB9-44E8-B056-CEDF64164B68@microsoft.com... > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I am very familiar with Group Policies. My problem is that I have 2500 > >> > Users > >> > and if there is no My Documents on the Desktop they are going to go > >> > crazy. > >> > The Mandatory profiles stops them from saving anything in their > >> > Profiles > >> > folder because I don't want them to be able to modify anything there. > >> > Therefore their Pictures, favorites etc and everything are part of My > >> > Documents. > >> > > >> > I can think of no reason why Microsoft would take away the My Documents > >> > and > >> > the Documents and Settings structure. It makes no sense. They had it > >> > all > >> > in > >> > one location with everything including All Users in one place. Now they > >> > have > >> > move All Users desktop and All Users Start Menu to two complete > >> > different > >> > folders (one of which is hidden). They give users "view" access to > >> > their > >> > entire Profile Folder structure which is my biggest problem. > >> > > >> > At home it is annoying because I just want to open My Documents and > >> > have > >> > to > >> > look through 25 folders in my profile folder just to see Documents. > >> > > >> > What I want to know is in a working domain how do Network Admins handle > >> > the > >> > fact that with XP there is a My Documents and with Vista there is not? > >> > It > >> > is > >> > like they went backwards to the days of NT. > >> > > >> > Lara > >> > > >> > "Kerry Brown" wrote: > >> > > >> >> "lforbes" <lforbes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> >> news:25B509D7-1F9C-4D7C-A82E-B25ADBAB131C@microsoft.com... > >> >> >I am a network admin of 2 large domains. I haven't got a copy of > >> >> >business > >> >> >yet > >> >> > but I have Home Premium on my new laptop. > >> >> > > >> >> > I am pretty scared about trying to support both Vista and XP in the > >> >> > same > >> >> > domain because for some reason Microsoft decided that "different" > >> >> > has > >> >> > to > >> >> > be > >> >> > "better" and changed all the folder locations. > >> >> > > >> >> > I use Mandatory Roaming Profiles. I DON'T WANT my users to see their > >> >> > profiles folder because everything in it Deletes when they logoff > >> >> > and > >> >> > if > >> >> > they > >> >> > save there it is gone. However, instead of My Documents (what was > >> >> > wrong > >> >> > with > >> >> > My Documents???) they have the entire Profiles folder on the Desktop > >> >> > instead??? > >> >> > > >> >> > The BIG problem with this is that I can't create a Shortcut to My > >> >> > Documents > >> >> > because each user has a different location. > >> >> > > >> >> > Is there no more My Documents Redirection? I have 3000 users and > >> >> > don't > >> >> > want > >> >> > regular roaming profiles as I change the mandatory profile depending > >> >> > on > >> >> > what > >> >> > software they need access to. > >> >> > > >> >> > Please tell me Business is more like XP. > >> >> > > >> >> > Also, what is up with all the extra "clicking" needed in Vista. It > >> >> > seems > >> >> > that they have added at least 2 clicks to every task. Eg. Changing > >> >> > Permissions was only one window, now you have to click "edit" twice. > >> >> > Also, > >> >> > where are all the shortcuts? > >> >> > > >> >> > Can't say I am impressed. I like the new bells and whistles but I > >> >> > think > >> >> > XP > >> >> > is far superior as far as supporting and productivity. > >> >> > > >> >> > Lara > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> You use group policies just like XP. Vista has many more policies but > >> >> the > >> >> principle is the same. > >> >> > >> >> http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window....mspx?mfr=true > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Kerry Brown > >> >> Microsoft MVP - Shell/User > >> >> http://www.vistahelp.ca > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vista Business On A Win2003 Domain? | Network & Sharing | |||
| Vista Business and 2003 Domain | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| vista business cannot join domain on sbs 2003 | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| Vista Business to Server2000 Domain | Vista networking & sharing | |||
| Business Vista PC in Win 2000 domain | Vista networking & sharing | |||