![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? The bugs in Window Explorer are really getting to me. Is there a better alternative program out there or is anyone developing one for Vista? I think Windows Explorer in XP had major bugs as well initially but you would think they have had enough time to get a file management tool perfected. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? I have not been able to understand (since Windows 95) why people struggle with explorer. There are many actual file manager programs available. Total Commander (free with nag ware) will do most anything that you may ever want to accomplish with your drives, and then some. I purchased it 8 years ago and have gotten about 25 updates since then. I have been using it for 8 years now. Prior to that I used XTree Gold, based upon DOS (in Windows 95). -- Regards, Richard Urban MVP Microsoft Windows Shell/User <atodzia@cox.net> wrote in message news:r8qg03h3ij73k2m38uh3qi58vb58o08f1h@4ax.com... > The bugs in Window Explorer are really getting to me. Is there a > better alternative program out there or is anyone developing one for > Vista? > > I think Windows Explorer in XP had major bugs as well initially but > you would think they have had enough time to get a file management > tool perfected. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:49:48 -0400, atodzia@cox.net wrote: >The bugs in Window Explorer are really getting to me. Is there a >better alternative program out there or is anyone developing one for >Vista? There were several good alternates that ran fine in XP, haven't looked for one that runs in Vista. Probably will be a crop pretty soon. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? you haven't been able to understand? then go download the x64 bit version. what, it's not there? well, maybe now you understand. Also, @people, try to understand that there is a difference between a programme and a system component! A programme can never be as fast or reliable as a component fully integrated into the system. Compare KDE on linux with WinExplorer and you'll see what I mean. The only thing vista explorer needs is a phucking "up" button. why isn't anybody coding one, for god's sake?! "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:uEn2UGBcHHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >I have not been able to understand (since Windows 95) why people struggle with explorer. > > There are many actual file manager programs available. Total Commander (free with nag ware) will do most anything that you may > ever want to accomplish with your drives, and then some. I purchased it 8 years ago and have gotten about 25 updates since then. I > have been using it for 8 years now. > > Prior to that I used XTree Gold, based upon DOS (in Windows 95). > > -- > > > Regards, > > Richard Urban MVP > Microsoft Windows Shell/User > > > <atodzia@cox.net> wrote in message news:r8qg03h3ij73k2m38uh3qi58vb58o08f1h@4ax.com... >> The bugs in Window Explorer are really getting to me. Is there a >> better alternative program out there or is anyone developing one for >> Vista? >> >> I think Windows Explorer in XP had major bugs as well initially but >> you would think they have had enough time to get a file management >> tool perfected. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? > The only thing vista explorer needs is a phucking "up" button. why isn't > anybody coding one, for god's sake?! It's got the breadcrumb trail instead, which does the same thing, and more. Steve |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? That's interesting, I haven't noticed any bugs. Could you give a couple of examples? Steve |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? Total Commander is the "Swiss Army Knife" of Windows utilities with some good plugins & addons. It's the first thing I load on every computer I work on. Nick Goetz "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in news:uEn2UGBcHHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl: > I have not been able to understand (since Windows 95) why people > struggle with explorer. > > There are many actual file manager programs available. Total Commander > (free with nag ware) will do most anything that you may ever want to > accomplish with your drives, and then some. I purchased it 8 years ago > and have gotten about 25 updates since then. I have been using it for > 8 years now. > > Prior to that I used XTree Gold, based upon DOS (in Windows 95). > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? "Steve Thackery" <thack@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:O2yTF6EcHHA.4488@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > That's interesting, I haven't noticed any bugs. Could you give a couple > of examples? > > Steve > For example it quite often does not show files in a folder, even if you click refresh. You need to be able to trust what is being displayed. -- Michael Chare |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? I will code one for you if you want. G "Richard Stallmann" <WRFan1@gmail.com> wrote in message news:%233Tf9SEcHHA.260@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > you haven't been able to understand? then go download the x64 bit version. > what, it's not there? well, maybe now you understand. > > Also, @people, try to understand that there is a difference between a > programme and a system component! A programme can never be as fast or > reliable as a component fully integrated into the system. Compare KDE on > linux with WinExplorer and you'll see what I mean. > > The only thing vista explorer needs is a phucking "up" button. why isn't > anybody coding one, for god's sake?! > > "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> schrieb im > Newsbeitrag news:uEn2UGBcHHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>I have not been able to understand (since Windows 95) why people struggle >>with explorer. >> >> There are many actual file manager programs available. Total Commander >> (free with nag ware) will do most anything that you may ever want to >> accomplish with your drives, and then some. I purchased it 8 years ago >> and have gotten about 25 updates since then. I have been using it for 8 >> years now. >> >> Prior to that I used XTree Gold, based upon DOS (in Windows 95). >> >> -- >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Richard Urban MVP >> Microsoft Windows Shell/User >> >> >> <atodzia@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:r8qg03h3ij73k2m38uh3qi58vb58o08f1h@4ax.com... >>> The bugs in Window Explorer are really getting to me. Is there a >>> better alternative program out there or is anyone developing one for >>> Vista? >>> >>> I think Windows Explorer in XP had major bugs as well initially but >>> you would think they have had enough time to get a file management >>> tool perfected. >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| | Re: Anyone developing a better, less buggy Windows Explorer for Vista? Oh and by the way, it will work with Vista he he he Sorry to hear your troubles man, I have not worked with x64 yet. Maybe I will release a 'phucking' up button for all the Vista users with trouble, and we can see how many times it gets pressed ![]() G "Richard Stallmann" <WRFan1@gmail.com> wrote in message news:%233Tf9SEcHHA.260@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > you haven't been able to understand? then go download the x64 bit version. > what, it's not there? well, maybe now you understand. > > Also, @people, try to understand that there is a difference between a > programme and a system component! A programme can never be as fast or > reliable as a component fully integrated into the system. Compare KDE on > linux with WinExplorer and you'll see what I mean. > > The only thing vista explorer needs is a phucking "up" button. why isn't > anybody coding one, for god's sake?! > > "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> schrieb im > Newsbeitrag news:uEn2UGBcHHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>I have not been able to understand (since Windows 95) why people struggle >>with explorer. >> >> There are many actual file manager programs available. Total Commander >> (free with nag ware) will do most anything that you may ever want to >> accomplish with your drives, and then some. I purchased it 8 years ago >> and have gotten about 25 updates since then. I have been using it for 8 >> years now. >> >> Prior to that I used XTree Gold, based upon DOS (in Windows 95). >> >> -- >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Richard Urban MVP >> Microsoft Windows Shell/User >> >> >> <atodzia@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:r8qg03h3ij73k2m38uh3qi58vb58o08f1h@4ax.com... >>> The bugs in Window Explorer are really getting to me. Is there a >>> better alternative program out there or is anyone developing one for >>> Vista? >>> >>> I think Windows Explorer in XP had major bugs as well initially but >>> you would think they have had enough time to get a file management >>> tool perfected. >> > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Developing for Windows 7. | Vista News | |||
| explorer buggy | Vista General | |||
| windows explorer - buggy | Vista General | |||
| Vista Windows Update - Horribly buggy :-( | Vista General | |||
| Buggy windows explorer behavior | Vista General | |||