![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Guest | Does Virtual Memory(paging file not in system HD) or ReadyBoost have better performance? They are assumed to have the same capacity. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Does Virtual Memory(paging file not in system HD) or ReadyBoost have better performance? ReadyBoost is an "aid" to Superfetch the page-filing utility. It's effectiveness depends mainly upon two things -1. the type HD - if the Windows Experince index for the HD is "5" or higher ReadyBoost does not increase performance - if index lower, as usually for laptops, Readyboost helps 2. ReadyBoost increases performance when non-sequential read/writes are involved - HD more effective for sequential stuff. Also a ReadyBoost cache is included by Superfetch whether or not an external memory device is attached. Data sent to readyboost cannot be accessed normally (explorer, etc.) - the data is encrypted and are copies of data stored by Superfetch which is why the device can be removed without loss of data. Another function of ReadyBoost is to monitor data access over time and improve Vista starup time. "Elliot" <elliot_barclay@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:3D65FEF0-69A0-4EC4-B548-F15977878A6F@microsoft.com... > They are assumed to have the same capacity. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Does Virtual Memory(paging file not in system HD) or ReadyBoost have better performance? "Elliot" <elliot_barclay@hotmail.co.uk> wrote > They are assumed to have the same capacity. ReadyBoost is not the same as the use of the page file. Pagefile.sys is needed, ReadyBoost is optional and depending on the system will or will not help performance. It's not one or the other. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tec...3/VistaKernel/ -- Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell] |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Guest | Re: Does Virtual Memory(paging file not in system HD) or ReadyBoost have better performance? Very detailed. Thanks for your answer. "AJR" <ajrjdr@comcast.net> wrote in message news:ebWR1zLlHHA.1604@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > ReadyBoost is an "aid" to Superfetch the page-filing utility. > It's effectiveness depends mainly upon two things -1. the type HD - if > the Windows Experince index for the HD is "5" or higher ReadyBoost does > not increase performance - if index lower, as usually for laptops, > Readyboost helps 2. ReadyBoost increases performance when non-sequential > read/writes are involved - HD more effective for sequential stuff. > > Also a ReadyBoost cache is included by Superfetch whether or not an > external memory device is attached. > > Data sent to readyboost cannot be accessed normally (explorer, etc.) - the > data is encrypted and are copies of data stored by Superfetch which is why > the device can be removed without loss of data. > > Another function of ReadyBoost is to monitor data access over time and > improve Vista starup time. > > "Elliot" <elliot_barclay@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:3D65FEF0-69A0-4EC4-B548-F15977878A6F@microsoft.com... >> They are assumed to have the same capacity. > > |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Virtual Memory Paging File - Clear at Shutdown | Tutorials | |||
| Virtual Memory Paging File - Change | Tutorials | |||
| will readyboost/superfetch degrade performance on a pc w/o paging file? | Vista General | |||
| Virtual Memory Paging File | General Discussion | |||
| System Paging File/Virtual Memory | Vista General | |||