![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
| | Vista - Vista Network Performance... again. |
![]() |
| |
| 05-22-2007 | #1 |
| | Vista Network Performance... again. Good Day, folks. I am curious if anyone would have any suggestions regarding the poor network performance under Windows Vista Business. Before I get into the crux of the issue, I'll briefly describe my setup. Machine 1 - Windows Vista Business. Machine 2 - Windows XP Professional. Machine 3 - FreeBSD 6.2-Stable Workstation. Machine 4 - FreeBSD 6.2-Stable Server. The server houses a 2.5TB RAID 5 array with a 3Ware hardware-based RAID controller. All of the machines have at least 2GB RAM, C2D processors and gigabit Ethernet. The router/switch is gigabit capable, although it does not support jumbo Ethernet frames. The basic issue is that transfers from, or to, the Vista machine are typically 75% less than any of the other machines: Server <-> XP or the workstation yields approx. 35MB/sec to 55MB/sec. Server <-> Vista yields approx. 4MB/sec to 12MB/sec. This is not a machine specific issue as I've installed FreeBSD for testing purposes on the machine that Vista is currently installed on and network performance was as expected with an average of 50MB/sec on the same hardware. I've tried a number of suggestions as per numerous websites, as well as these newsgroups. Some of these suggestions include: - Disabling Remote Differential Compression. - Disabling TCP Autotuning. - Installing Hotfix KB931770. - Disabling Indexing. - Updating the NIC drivers to the latest available. Although the above did increase throughput by about 1-2MB/sec, this is still rather unacceptable. I tend to find it rather hard to believe that an issue such as this is still present months after the general release of Vista, and one that is rather widespread based on various newsgroups and web-based forums. I am really hoping that someone could provide suggestions that would remedy this issue. I routinely push multi-gigabyte files to and from the server from this machine, and this performance issue is getting painful to deal with. Any help and/or suggestions would be most appreciated. |
My System Specs![]() |
| 05-22-2007 | #2 |
| | Re: Vista Network Performance... again. Seeing as you have tested it on both machines try disabling the firewall! -- http://www.goldwatches.com/watches.asp?Brand=39 "John" <no@spam.com> wrote in message news:f2u008$6if$1@reader2.panix.com... > Good Day, folks. > > I am curious if anyone would have any suggestions regarding the poor > network performance under Windows Vista Business. Before I get into > the crux of the issue, I'll briefly describe my setup. > > Machine 1 - Windows Vista Business. > Machine 2 - Windows XP Professional. > Machine 3 - FreeBSD 6.2-Stable Workstation. > Machine 4 - FreeBSD 6.2-Stable Server. > > The server houses a 2.5TB RAID 5 array with a 3Ware hardware-based RAID > controller. All of the machines have at least 2GB RAM, C2D processors and > gigabit Ethernet. The router/switch is gigabit capable, although it does > not support jumbo Ethernet frames. > > The basic issue is that transfers from, or to, the Vista machine are > typically 75% less than any of the other machines: > > Server <-> XP or the workstation yields approx. 35MB/sec to 55MB/sec. > Server <-> Vista yields approx. 4MB/sec to 12MB/sec. > > This is not a machine specific issue as I've installed FreeBSD for testing > purposes on the machine that Vista is currently installed on and network > performance was as expected with an average of 50MB/sec on the same > hardware. > > I've tried a number of suggestions as per numerous websites, as well as > these newsgroups. Some of these suggestions include: > > - Disabling Remote Differential Compression. > - Disabling TCP Autotuning. > - Installing Hotfix KB931770. > - Disabling Indexing. > - Updating the NIC drivers to the latest available. > > Although the above did increase throughput by about 1-2MB/sec, this > is still rather unacceptable. I tend to find it rather hard to believe > that an issue such as this is still present months after the general > release of Vista, and one that is rather widespread based on various > newsgroups and web-based forums. > > I am really hoping that someone could provide suggestions that would > remedy this issue. I routinely push multi-gigabyte files to and from > the server from this machine, and this performance issue is getting > painful to deal with. > > Any help and/or suggestions would be most appreciated. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| 05-22-2007 | #3 |
| Windows Vista™ Ultimate | The performance monitors in Vista will automatically ajust every type of data transfer and if theres not enough for a program to work with it will slow the extra non system stuff right down...there might be some help here (link) How to Fix Windows Vista Slow Network Transfer » ADS-Links.com Internet Marketing - Ian Lee There is a few other windows options to try if its really essential but a more simple way is just to use a ftp server. |
My System Specs![]() |
| 05-22-2007 | #4 |
| | Re: Vista Network Performance... again. dmex <dmex.2qzea5@no-mx.forums.net> wrote: > > The performance monitors in Vista will automatically ajust every type of > data transfer and if theres not enough for a program to work with it > will slow the extra non system stuff right down...there might be some > help here (link) 'How to Fix Windows Vista Slow Network Transfer ? > ADS-Links.com Internet Marketing - Ian Lee' (http://tinyurl.com/yq32c8) Thaks for the link, but unfortunately, none of that either applies or has already been attempted. The fact of the matter is that Vista is degrading my network throughput by, in most cases, over 75%. This is absolutely unacceptable. I routinely push ~25-30GB of data to and from the server daily. I do a lot of video encoding with this machine, and the abysmal transfer rates have a large impact on my application. > There is a few other windows options to try if its really essential but > a more simple way is just to use a ftp server. This isn't really much of an option, as the application that I utilize doesn't support FTP transfers. On the server side, Samba is being utilized to provide share access to the RAID volume for the Windows clients. A drive letter is simply mapped to this share on the server and my application goes about its' business with that mapping. Trying to hack in the use of FTP into the workflow adds unnecessary manual intervention and won't solve the network issues. One thing that does strike me as odd, and perhaps is a start into trying to get this resolved; I attempted to copy a few files from the Vista machine to the server from a command prompt using `xcopy`. Transfer rates peaked at about 18MB/sec for large file copies to the server. When attempting to do the same from Explorer, transfers again dropped to about 6MB/sec. There is some really odd stuff going on with Vista. When I tried to do the same thing from a command prompt using `robocopy`, transfer rates also dropped to about 7-8MB/sec. Thanks for the link and the suggestions. It was appreciated. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| 05-22-2007 | #5 |
| | Re: Vista Network Performance... again. James Matthews <jamesmatt18@gmail.com> wrote: > Seeing as you have tested it on both machines try disabling the firewall! All of the machines on the network are firewalled at the router. None are firewalled locally. None of the machines, except the Vista machine, are experiencing throughput issues. It's not a firewall issue. Thanks for the suggestion, however. It was appreciated. > |
My System Specs![]() |
| 06-24-2007 | #6 |
| Vista Ultimate x64 | Re: Vista Network Performance... again. Firstly, sorry for waking an old thread. I'm having the same issue though. It seems I'm stuck on 100mbit even though both NIC's (on the server and on the client) link at 1Gbps. I've disabled the QoS scheduler and that helped a bit, I'm now getting 12.5MB/s at peak, where I got 11MB/s tops before. Anyone solved this issue? |
My System Specs![]() |
| 06-24-2007 | #7 |
| | Re: Vista Network Performance... again. did you enable/disable IPV6? "luku" <luku.2so9y7@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message news:luku.2so9y7@no-mx.forums.net... > > Firstly, sorry for waking an old thread. > > I'm having the same issue though. > > It seems I'm stuck on 100mbit even though both NIC's (on the server and > on the client) link at 1Gbps. I've disabled the QoS scheduler and that > helped a bit, I'm now getting 12.5MB/s at peak, where I got 11MB/s tops > before. > > Anyone solved this issue? > > > -- > luku |
My System Specs![]() |
| 06-24-2007 | #8 |
| Vista Ultimate x64 | Re: Vista Network Performance... again. I've tried that yes, no result. Also tried using total commander for copying, no change. I even tried installing ipv6 on the server (windows 2003), but no luck. |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads for: Vista Network Performance... again.
| ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vista 64 Network Performance issues. | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Server2003 network and Vista - too slow performance | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Vista SP1 - Major network performance problems | Vista General | |||
| Vista Network Performance | Vista General | |||
| MS Access 2007, Vista, network performance | Vista networking & sharing | |||