Vista - Ubuntu - Read the review - Ubuntu Sucks

> So Ubuntu has a habit of improving drastically every 6 months. =)

Yup. Ubuntu's made some great strides in the last few releases. I actually
love the "enchanced effects" they have. They're a ton more useful than
anything MS added to the Aero interface. Aero's pretty and all but it
certainly doesn't add anything useful.

On 6/21/2007 5:50 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard

> Frank wrote:
>> GO wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Good question. I'm not really sure anymore. This group seems to be
>>> full of completely unhelpful people. I first came to this group to
>>> get assistance but my question was treated with such disdain it does
>>> make me wonder why I'm still here.
>>> Why are you here? Certainly not to aid anyone, or provide any
>>> valuable insight.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I guess you've failed to correctly peruse the ng if that all you know
>> of my postings.
>> Who cares?
>> I certainly don't give a rats ass what you think.
>> Frank
>
> No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way I could
> have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal of threads so far
> and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none* of which were helpful. So
> statistically speaking, this leads me to believe that the rest of your posts
> are equally as useful. Perhaps you do help the odd person but the odds are
> stacked as you being as useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.
>
>
>

You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
businessman:

Search for <OCRG#tEtHHA.4916@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl> in Google Groups.

--
Terry R.

***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

Terry R. wrote:
> On 6/21/2007 5:50 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>> GO wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good question. I'm not really sure anymore. This group seems to
>>>> be full of completely unhelpful people. I first came to this
>>>> group to get assistance but my question was treated with such
>>>> disdain it does make me wonder why I'm still here.
>>>> Why are you here? Certainly not to aid anyone, or provide any
>>>> valuable insight.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I guess you've failed to correctly peruse the ng if that all you
>>> know of my postings.
>>> Who cares?
>>> I certainly don't give a rats ass what you think.
>>> Frank
>>
>> No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way
>> I could have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal
>> of threads so far and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none*
>> of which were helpful. So statistically speaking, this leads me to
>> believe that the rest of your posts are equally as useful. Perhaps
>> you do help the odd person but the odds are stacked as you being as
>> useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
> time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
> bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
> unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
> businessman:
>

Yup. I was tempted to do as you say or even perform a search, but I have
better things to do with my time. But I think I've seen enough already to
make a valid opinion. Why I even bothered replying to him is beyond me. I
guess I just have too much (unplaced) faith in humanity.

On 6/21/2007 8:21 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard

> Terry R. wrote:
>> On 6/21/2007 5:50 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>> GO wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Good question. I'm not really sure anymore. This group seems to
>>>>> be full of completely unhelpful people. I first came to this
>>>>> group to get assistance but my question was treated with such
>>>>> disdain it does make me wonder why I'm still here.
>>>>> Why are you here? Certainly not to aid anyone, or provide any
>>>>> valuable insight.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I guess you've failed to correctly peruse the ng if that all you
>>>> know of my postings.
>>>> Who cares?
>>>> I certainly don't give a rats ass what you think.
>>>> Frank
>>> No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way
>>> I could have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal
>>> of threads so far and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none*
>>> of which were helpful. So statistically speaking, this leads me to
>>> believe that the rest of your posts are equally as useful. Perhaps
>>> you do help the odd person but the odds are stacked as you being as
>>> useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
>> time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
>> bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
>> unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
>> businessman:
>>
>
> Yup. I was tempted to do as you say or even perform a search, but I have
> better things to do with my time. But I think I've seen enough already to
> make a valid opinion. Why I even bothered replying to him is beyond me. I
> guess I just have too much (unplaced) faith in humanity.
>
>
>

I feel the same. Don't let it stifle your faith.

--
Terry R.

***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.