![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | The false intelligence of Vista So I was copying some files last night. I wanted to get all the pictures in 5 subdirectories that matched a specific name (about 40 pictures out of 500). I moved the group of directories into a folder of their own so I could easily limit my search to just those directories. How long did you say the index would take to update? Pretty freaking scary to copy 500 pictures to a subfolder (which did not take too too long) but then have only 2 returns show up on the search when you know there are more than that. Useless POS. Anyways, after some searching and researching and my system chugging away to scan non-indexed files and locations I think I finally had the list. I think. I am still not sure if the list included everything I wanted, but since I have been running Vista I find a lower expected work quality generally helps. Anyways, I have my list of photos so I start to copy them to a processing directory. Vista kacks somewhere in the middle of this list. I get a beauiful dialog saying that Explorer has kacked and Vista is the one who caused it. Best yet - there IS a solution. I think, that's odd. I thought I was set to recieve auto-updates. So I find the link to the KB article (why can't I have links underlined? bloody hard to find links when you are used to the underline, I guess that is my bad), open the article, read the article. Sure enough, it seems to apply to me. Read farther along and see what things the patch will do to my system. A lot that I do not like. A lot that will bring me back to square one in configuring. But I think - what the heck - a patched MS product is a normal MS product. I proceed. And the UAC confirmation kicks in. I am happy this time. This is where I would expect it to come up - when I am installing something from the web. However, by this time I am so desensitized to the process that it is no longer even a shock when my screen blacks out for 2 seconds before the freaking dialog appears. My mind goes into this is 5 more seconds inturrupting nmy workflow, wait for the bloody ok button and press it. Install starts to install. It is not the worlds fasted. But it does its thing. Gets to the end and says it is done with something.. but I get a fantastic dialog saying the patch DOES NOT APPLY TO MY SYSTEM. Wha? I started this whole process because Vista told me there WAS a solution. It seems that most of the "help" and "wizard" type links I find in Vista are generic. They sort of look dynamic. They definately look like they are helpful and pertain to your problem. But for the msot part - they are worthless junk. For the most part I say, because they will probably be right a percent of the time. But a broken clock is right 2 times a day as well. Is there any way in Vista to get actual correct context sensitive help? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: The false intelligence of Vista "theclyde" <theclyde@xxxxxx-gods.com> wrote in message news:1189599916.049562.299000@xxxxxx .. .. Quote: > find the link to the KB article (why can't I have links underlined? > bloody hard to find links when you are used to the underline, I guess > that is my bad), open the article, read the article. Options\Advanced\Browsing\Underline links -- choose Always, Hover, or Never |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: The false intelligence of Vista "theclyde" <theclyde@xxxxxx-gods.com> wrote in message news:1189599916.049562.299000@xxxxxx Quote: > < chop > > > Is there any way in Vista to get actual correct context sensitive help? > You can set Windows Vista's Help to go online and get the latest available: Start > Help and Support > at the upper right click on Options > select Settings... > check the "Include Windows Online Help and Support when you search for help" check box > click OK You can set Internet Explorer to underline links as per John Hanley's instructions. Saucy |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: The false intelligence of Vista On Sep 12, 9:05 am, "John Hanley" <jphan...@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > "theclyde" <thecl...@xxxxxx-gods.com> wrote in message > > news:1189599916.049562.299000@xxxxxx > . > . > Quote: > > find the link to the KB article (why can't I have links underlined? > > bloody hard to find links when you are used to the underline, I guess > > that is my bad), open the article, read the article. > To have your links underlined with IE7: Tools\Internet > Options\Advanced\Browsing\Underline links -- choose Always, Hover, or Never though - that is one of the first things I touch on a new system. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: The false intelligence of Vista On Sep 12, 9:26 am, "Saucy" <saucy538347334873772.sj...@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > "theclyde" <thecl...@xxxxxx-gods.com> wrote in message > > news:1189599916.049562.299000@xxxxxx > Quote: > > < chop > Quote: > > Is there any way in Vista to get actual correct context sensitive help? > You can set Windows Vista's Help to go online and get the latest available: > > Start > Help and Support > at the upper right click on Options > select > Settings... > check the "Include Windows Online Help and Support when you > search for help" check box > click OK > > You can set Internet Explorer to underline links as per John Hanley's > instructions. > > Saucy - it was with an incorrect help. Regardless, even with online help included... my help is neither context sensitive nor accurate. Is there any way to get non-IE links to underline always? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| | Re: The false intelligence of Vista "theclyde" <theclyde@xxxxxx-gods.com> a écrit dans le message de news:1189599916.049562.299000@xxxxxx Quote: > So I was copying some files last night. I wanted to get all the > pictures in 5 subdirectories that matched a specific name (about 40 > pictures out of 500). I moved the group of directories into a folder > of their own so I could easily limit my search to just those > directories. How long did you say the index would take to update? > Pretty freaking scary to copy 500 pictures to a subfolder (which did > not take too too long) but then have only 2 returns show up on the > search when you know there are more than that. Useless POS. Anyways, > after some searching and researching and my system chugging away to > scan non-indexed files and locations I think I finally had the list. > I think. I am still not sure if the list included everything I wanted, > but since I have been running Vista I find a lower expected work > quality generally helps. > > Anyways, I have my list of photos so I start to copy them to a > processing directory. Vista kacks somewhere in the middle of this > list. I get a beauiful dialog saying that Explorer has kacked and > Vista is the one who caused it. Best yet - there IS a solution. I > think, that's odd. I thought I was set to recieve auto-updates. So I > find the link to the KB article (why can't I have links underlined? > bloody hard to find links when you are used to the underline, I guess > that is my bad), open the article, read the article. Sure enough, it > seems to apply to me. Read farther along and see what things the patch > will do to my system. A lot that I do not like. A lot that will bring > me back to square one in configuring. But I think - what the heck - a > patched MS product is a normal MS product. I proceed. > > And the UAC confirmation kicks in. I am happy this time. This is where > I would expect it to come up - when I am installing something from the > web. However, by this time I am so desensitized to the process that it > is no longer even a shock when my screen blacks out for 2 seconds > before the freaking dialog appears. My mind goes into this is 5 more > seconds inturrupting nmy workflow, wait for the bloody ok button and > press it. > > Install starts to install. It is not the worlds fasted. But it does > its thing. Gets to the end and says it is done with something.. but I > get a fantastic dialog saying the patch DOES NOT APPLY TO MY SYSTEM. > Wha? I started this whole process because Vista told me there WAS a > solution. > > It seems that most of the "help" and "wizard" type links I find in > Vista are generic. They sort of look dynamic. They definately look > like they are helpful and pertain to your problem. But for the msot > part - they are worthless junk. > > For the most part I say, because they will probably be right a percent > of the time. But a broken clock is right 2 times a day as well. > > Is there any way in Vista to get actual correct context sensitive help? > I did, but it's quite obscure and didn't help. Not only do you have to pay through the nose for V*sta, but you have to set up an email account so they can spy on you even better. Regards |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Programming Collective Intelligence | PowerShell | |||
| Vista giving false alarm? | Vista General | |||
| Vista Sync False Advertising | Vista file management | |||
| Intelligence Built into Microsoft Solitaire | Vista Games | |||
| Q&A: Microsoft’s Business Intelligence Strategy | Vista News | |||