![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| | Re: appdata-local-Application Data-Application Data-Application Data infinitum ad nauseum. WHY On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:00:42 -0400, "Rick Rogers" <rick@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: >Right, it is a recursive mess. My point is that in order to resolve it you >need to figure out what software on your system is trying to make a 'real' >folder out of it (as it is a designated system shortcut, this is not >possible). The properties of the folders, or the lowest level one, might >give clues. > >Another thought is to run process explorer and see what software is >accessing that location: >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sys...sexplorer.mspx > Quote: >this is the recursive mess Quote: >>C:\Users\user_you\AppData\Local\Application Data\Application Data\Application >>Data\Application Data This Vista is moving into the same situation I had with XP. I feel a cascading failure coming on. It killed a wallpaper gadget that's been working for awhile now the otherday. Installing the new TV updates went to crap. Apple updated Itunes and it failed to install correctly. Itunes worked with a download install. I used system restore on XP. Went to using Acronis instead. Haven't tried a system restore on vista yet, but what I heard the other day should confirm that vista's system restore is as bad if not worse than the XP version. But then why shouldn't it be Vista is just a clone of XP with a shiny wrapper. I've always felt that M$ updates were the problem with most failures. -- more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| | Re: appdata-local-Application Data-Application Data-Application Data infinitum ad nauseum. WHY <keepout@xxxxxx> wrote news t6le3l5u2au9jf7v3g8tthlhmds57k9tv@xxxxxxQuote: > But then why shouldn't it be Vista is just a clone of XP with a shiny > wrapper. using the same default directories it installed into on earlier versions, then the software doesn't always work, plus it can sometimes break other programs trying to use files/folders that the malfunctioning software install has messed up. That's why several people are suggesting a bit of research to discover -what- program caused the mess in the first place, so we can help you fix it, and then fix the other problems it caused. |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| | Re: appdata-local-Application Data-Application Data-Application Data infinitum ad nauseum. WHY On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:35:17 -0400, <here@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: ><keepout@xxxxxx> wrote >news t6le3l5u2au9jf7v3g8tthlhmds57k9tv@xxxxxxQuote: >> But then why shouldn't it be Vista is just a clone of XP with a shiny >> wrapper. >No, it isn't, and that's the problem. If you install software into Vista >using the same default directories it installed into on earlier versions, >then the software doesn't always work, plus it can sometimes break other >programs trying to use files/folders that the malfunctioning software >install has messed up. That's why several people are suggesting a bit of >research to discover -what- program caused the mess in the first place, so >we can help you fix it, and then fix the other problems it caused. > Vista is pretty much a clone of XP. An improved version, but pretty much the same thing. I'm using that process explorer, but it has nothing to do with any folders that I can see, or how to find out what's causing this recursive mess. FWIW: I see folders in advanced mode which might explain why I see thisfolder and others don't.. -- more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| | Re: appdata-local-Application Data-Application Data-Application Data infinitum ad nauseum. WHY Hi, Quote: > And this isn't happening on your Vista ? Quote: > It killed a wallpaper gadget that's been working for awhile now the other > day. failed to install correctly. Itunes worked with a download install. Well, all sorts of people have been having trouble with Apple software on Vista, and it's mainly because compatible versions weren't released until after Vista went into retail. People were not patient enough to wait for Apple to do what they should have done and installed, or attempted to install, the older software versions. Many had to format and start over due to the damage. The same problem can be ascribed to some other software as well. Basically, something you installed or attempted to install went bellyup, and what you are seeing is the result of it. You've got two ways to deal with it, as it's really not doing anything other than "being there". If it was locking your system up with a loop, then it'd be a problem, but I don't get the impression that it is. You can ignore it, or you can restore it. Quote: > I used system restore on XP. Went to using Acronis instead. Haven't tried > a system restore on vista yet, but what I heard the other day should > confirm that vista's system restore is as bad if not worse than the XP > version. something like Acronis or other third party software whose only concern is making and restoring an image backup. Quote: > But then why shouldn't it be Vista is just a clone of XP with a shiny > wrapper. about what's under the hood. Quote: > I've always felt that M$ updates were the problem with most failures. unsigned ones that users force into the system. Then they wonder why the system goes all higgedly-piggedly. Using software versions not suitable for the OS is the #2 problem, but it lags far behind the first as there is a lot of backwards compatibility built in to handle this. Driver files, though they are bits of software just like programs, have to be written for the OS they are installed on. Use of ones designed for a different OS will nearly always cause some instability. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com <snip> |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| | Re: appdata-local-Application Data-Application Data-Application Data infinitum ad nauseum. WHY On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:01:21 -0400, "Rick Rogers" <rick@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: Quote: >> It killed a wallpaper gadget that's been working for awhile now the other >> day. the recursive directory is still ridiculous. But the fact is it was happening on another machine. Here in this group. I have no idea what the thread was or if it was fixed. -- more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| | Re: appdata-local-Application Data-Application Data-Application Data infinitum ad nauseum. WHY On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:13:41 -0700, loubie <louispa1153@xxxxxx> wrote: Quote: > >I just noted that I have the same problem in my Vista Home Premium, i.e. >a cascading series of Application Data shortcuts under >User/Appdata/Local/.... I deleted the second occurrance of Application >Data in the cascade. A message came up saying that "...the shortcut >didn't exists probably because it was directed to a network..." . I said >OK. Closed Windows Explorer, reopened it and the cascading shortcuts are >gone. > >:smile: -- more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| User application data | Vista General | |||
| HTA application - trying to use data from text box | VB Script | |||
| RE: Application Data | .NET General | |||
| Application Data | Vista performance & maintenance | |||
| Application Data-Why So many copies? | Vista General | |||