When you burn, burn at the slowest speed permitted by your software. MS
reports that three fourths of these problems are actually due to the burn
speed.
"- Bobb -" <bobb@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:OJni0%23FoGHA.1076@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> got getright and downloading x64 .iso now
>
> "- Bobb -" <bobb@netscape.net> wrote in message
> news:Op9yCaFoGHA.1332@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks Mark,
>> I'll fetch that program and reread Jane's eariler message in the other
>> thread.
>> I used the checker from Zack's page but never got the right checksum. I
>> used the one Andre mentioned and got same thing.
>> Every time I got the same WRONG checksum - that's the wierd part - I
>> download 965mb and get the SAME wrong checksum ??? I could see if they
>> were all different , but to incorrectly arrive with the same checksum ...
>> the odds are astronomical : that's why I gave up. I'll try it again and
>> update the other thread rather than using this new one
>>
>> Thanks to all.
>>
>> "Mark D. VandenBerg" <mvan103@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eN4P9QCoGHA.1332@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> Hey Bobb, With the x64 ISO, I downloaded the sucker four separate times,
>>> and file-checked the last one with four different apps. I used
>>> "GetRight" to download it and its built-in checker verified the file as
>>> correct. Nero's MD5 checker would just crash, the one recommended by
>>> Zack on his website would come up with the wrong hash, and the one
>>> called "md5" as recommended by Jane C. came-up with the correct hash.
>>>
>>> So there I sat, six Bloody Maries in to the process, with two correct,
>>> one incorrect and one app crash. So I said "ah #$%^ it, and burned a
>>> disc. Works great, I am using to type this.
>>>
>>>
>>> "- Bobb -" <bobb@netscape.net> wrote in message
>>> news:ua5flL%23nGHA.2312@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>
>>>> "Mark D. VandenBerg" <mvan103@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:%23BhYeD%23nGHA.4248@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Hey Bobb!
>>>>>
>>>>> Glad you are up and running.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Mark.
>>>> I finally had to give up on getting X64 Vista downloaded and onto a CD
>>>> with the right checksum. X86 had no hiccups at all . Now I can get on
>>>> with it. Thanks for the help
>>>>
>>>> Bobb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "- Bobb -" <bobb@netscape.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:eZRrus6nGHA.764@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Alan,
>>>>>> I does that. On my screen it shows any threads that I've been
>>>>>> involved in. ( Did that with OE also.)
>>>>>> Tools- View - Hide Read - Show replies to my messages+ group by
>>>>>> conversation
>>>>>> = shows only unread messages in any of "your messages" threads:
>>>>>> whether "replies" or you start 'em - doesn't matter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bobb
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alan Simpson" <alan@coolnerds.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:59B8A823-DB66-4E9A-A5AC-9B6A13E5ADF5@microsoft.com...
>>>>>>> Yeah, the message rules and view options are pretty cool in Windows
>>>>>>> Mail. It would be nice to have an option to automatically "Mark
>>>>>>> items to which I reply as Watched", along with the option to mark
>>>>>>> threads you initiate as watched.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "-Bobb" <bobb@netscape.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:O%23jUGZ4nGHA.1808@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>> Just installed x86 Beta 2 - in Mail ( new OE) , setup my newsgroups
>>>>>>>> and noticed that when I do a View- All messages - Replies to my
>>>>>>>> messages . I went to tools- options - "get next 999" and it lists
>>>>>>>> my messages/replies at the top - but shows all others too. So, I
>>>>>>>> went to View - Current View - to double-check my settings and
>>>>>>>> noticed that there is an option to:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> " Show only Useful Conversations"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now THAT's interesting .... and it does show only my messages!
>>>>>>>> How nice of them to be so considerate and call only my messages
>>>>>>>> USEFUL.
>>>>>>>> (Even though mine are usually questions and not answers.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bobb
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>