Vista - Re: Am I missing Something?

10-07-2007

NoStop wrote:

Quote:

> fourteen wrote:
>
> <snip>
>

Quote:

>>
>>You are full of squat to say in 18 yrs, linux is "easier to install"
>>linux is horrible with drivers
>>maybe "recently it is a little better", but 3 years ago....linux was awful

>
>
> 3 years is a L-O-N-G time in the Linux world. A very long time, as Linux is
> being developed at a breathtaking speed compared to Windoze. Today the
> ordinary Linux distribution supports more hardware than Vista does.
>
> Cheers.
>

hahaha...3 yrs? How about 15 yrs and still trying to make even the
smallest dent in the computer desktop market...well doris?
Nice fantasy world you linturds live in.
Frank

10-07-2007

Alias wrote:

Quote:

> Frank wrote:
>

Quote:

>> NoStop wrote:
>>

Quote:

>>> fourteen wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are full of squat to say in 18 yrs, linux is "easier to install"
>>>> linux is horrible with drivers
>>>> maybe "recently it is a little better", but 3 years ago....linux was
>>>> awful
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 3 years is a L-O-N-G time in the Linux world. A very long time, as
>>> Linux is
>>> being developed at a breathtaking speed compared to Windoze. Today the
>>> ordinary Linux distribution supports more hardware than Vista does.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>

>>
>> hahaha...3 yrs? How about 15 yrs and still trying to make even the
>> smallest dent in the computer desktop market...well doris?
>> Nice fantasy world you linturds live in.
>> Frank

>
>
> Linux just became really user friendly a year or so ago, not 15 years
> ago but facts like that won't stop you from lying, insulting and
> blustering, now will they?
>
> Windows has been around for over 15 years and they still can't get it
> right.
>

I see you've now completely lost what was left of your small mind and
joined the fanatical linux cause.
Is that now your substitute religion?
Frank

10-07-2007

NoStop wrote:

Quote:

>
>
> It's not trying to make any dent in the desktop "market". It's simply there
> for those of us bright enough to run it, because it is a better o/s than
> anything Microsoft has been able to come up with. To play in a "market" it
> has to cost something. Linux is free. Get it? Nah, never thought you
> could/would.
>
> Cheers.
>

hehehe...now that is the best excuse for failing to penetrate the
desktop market I've ever heard. Did his holiness RS give you that bit of
confused logic to say when cornered on the failure of linux to gain any
significant market share over the last 15 yrs?
That excuse sure sounds like something a cult would say.
Frank

10-08-2007

Alias wrote:

Quote:

> Frank wrote:

Quote:

>> Alias wrote:
>>

Quote:

>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> NoStop wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> fourteen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are full of squat to say in 18 yrs, linux is "easier to install"
>>>>>> linux is horrible with drivers
>>>>>> maybe "recently it is a little better", but 3 years ago....linux
>>>>>> was awful
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 3 years is a L-O-N-G time in the Linux world. A very long time, as
>>>>> Linux is
>>>>> being developed at a breathtaking speed compared to Windoze. Today the
>>>>> ordinary Linux distribution supports more hardware than Vista does.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hahaha...3 yrs? How about 15 yrs and still trying to make even the
>>>> smallest dent in the computer desktop market...well doris?
>>>> Nice fantasy world you linturds live in.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>> Linux just became really user friendly a year or so ago, not 15 years
>>> ago but facts like that won't stop you from lying, insulting and
>>> blustering, now will they?
>>>
>>> Windows has been around for over 15 years and they still can't get it
>>> right.
>>>

>> I see you've now completely lost what was left of your small mind and
>> joined the fanatical linux cause.
>> Is that now your substitute religion?
>> Frank

>
> I see you can't refute what's stated. Is that your religion, to avoid
> the issue?
>

The biggest point here is that Linux has succeeded on the desktop.
Will it ever be as big as Windows? No.
Does it really matter? Yes.
The world needs Windows for those who know what a mouse is and can use it.
Linux is needed for those who like to control what they use.
Windows is so big the only way it can continue to grow is through
unethical business practices.
If MS really thought that Linux would never succeed, because it was no
good, it not pay any attention to Linux. But most everything it does is
to try to stop Linux. So even though it says Linux is no good its
actions say other wise.
Cases in point-any non MS computer developed country. MS tries through
negotiations and incentives to stop the use of Linux. Then complains
about piracy of its products in that country. Then makes deal with said
country that all computers in that country will not be sold without an
Os. In the same deal Volume licensing is sold for Windows with
agreements to either limit or stop all other Os's.
Then when all of the above don't work then drastically cut prices in
said county under the guise of fighting piracy.
Then once MS has a strangle hold on that market their prices go back up.
Any stop to piracy? No. The only ones hurt by these tactics? The
consumer,their competition and MS.
Why. The consumers because they have fewer choices and higher prices.
The competition because they can't.
MS because they only way they can continue to grow is through the above
deceit.
The pirates? Not if you listen to MS. Piracy is as bad as ever and
growing. Is it or is it marketing?
Even the EU figured this out.
caver1

10-07-2007	#1 (permalink)
Frank n/a posts	Re: Am I missing Something? NoStop wrote: Quote: > fourteen wrote: > > <snip> > Quote: >> >>You are full of squat to say in 18 yrs, linux is "easier to install" >>linux is horrible with drivers >>maybe "recently it is a little better", but 3 years ago....linux was awful > > > 3 years is a L-O-N-G time in the Linux world. A very long time, as Linux is > being developed at a breathtaking speed compared to Windoze. Today the > ordinary Linux distribution supports more hardware than Vista does. > > Cheers. > hahaha...3 yrs? How about 15 yrs and still trying to make even the smallest dent in the computer desktop market...well doris? Nice fantasy world you linturds live in. Frank
My System Specs

10-07-2007	#2 (permalink)
Frank n/a posts	Re: Am I missing Something? Alias wrote: Quote: > Frank wrote: > Quote: >> NoStop wrote: >> Quote: >>> fourteen wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> >>>> You are full of squat to say in 18 yrs, linux is "easier to install" >>>> linux is horrible with drivers >>>> maybe "recently it is a little better", but 3 years ago....linux was >>>> awful >>> >>> >>> >>> 3 years is a L-O-N-G time in the Linux world. A very long time, as >>> Linux is >>> being developed at a breathtaking speed compared to Windoze. Today the >>> ordinary Linux distribution supports more hardware than Vista does. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >> >> hahaha...3 yrs? How about 15 yrs and still trying to make even the >> smallest dent in the computer desktop market...well doris? >> Nice fantasy world you linturds live in. >> Frank > > > Linux just became really user friendly a year or so ago, not 15 years > ago but facts like that won't stop you from lying, insulting and > blustering, now will they? > > Windows has been around for over 15 years and they still can't get it > right. > I see you've now completely lost what was left of your small mind and joined the fanatical linux cause. Is that now your substitute religion? Frank
My System Specs

10-07-2007	#3 (permalink)
Frank n/a posts	Re: Am I missing Something? NoStop wrote: Quote: > > > It's not trying to make any dent in the desktop "market". It's simply there > for those of us bright enough to run it, because it is a better o/s than > anything Microsoft has been able to come up with. To play in a "market" it > has to cost something. Linux is free. Get it? Nah, never thought you > could/would. > > Cheers. > hehehe...now that is the best excuse for failing to penetrate the desktop market I've ever heard. Did his holiness RS give you that bit of confused logic to say when cornered on the failure of linux to gain any significant market share over the last 15 yrs? That excuse sure sounds like something a cult would say. Frank
My System Specs

10-08-2007	#4 (permalink)
caver1 n/a posts	Re: Am I missing Something? Alias wrote: Quote: > Frank wrote: Quote: >> Alias wrote: >> Quote: >>> Frank wrote: >>> >>>> NoStop wrote: >>>> >>>>> fourteen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <snip> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You are full of squat to say in 18 yrs, linux is "easier to install" >>>>>> linux is horrible with drivers >>>>>> maybe "recently it is a little better", but 3 years ago....linux >>>>>> was awful >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 3 years is a L-O-N-G time in the Linux world. A very long time, as >>>>> Linux is >>>>> being developed at a breathtaking speed compared to Windoze. Today the >>>>> ordinary Linux distribution supports more hardware than Vista does. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers. >>>>> >>>> >>>> hahaha...3 yrs? How about 15 yrs and still trying to make even the >>>> smallest dent in the computer desktop market...well doris? >>>> Nice fantasy world you linturds live in. >>>> Frank >>> >>> >>> Linux just became really user friendly a year or so ago, not 15 years >>> ago but facts like that won't stop you from lying, insulting and >>> blustering, now will they? >>> >>> Windows has been around for over 15 years and they still can't get it >>> right. >>> >> I see you've now completely lost what was left of your small mind and >> joined the fanatical linux cause. >> Is that now your substitute religion? >> Frank > > I see you can't refute what's stated. Is that your religion, to avoid > the issue? > The biggest point here is that Linux has succeeded on the desktop. Will it ever be as big as Windows? No. Does it really matter? Yes. The world needs Windows for those who know what a mouse is and can use it. Linux is needed for those who like to control what they use. Windows is so big the only way it can continue to grow is through unethical business practices. If MS really thought that Linux would never succeed, because it was no good, it not pay any attention to Linux. But most everything it does is to try to stop Linux. So even though it says Linux is no good its actions say other wise. Cases in point-any non MS computer developed country. MS tries through negotiations and incentives to stop the use of Linux. Then complains about piracy of its products in that country. Then makes deal with said country that all computers in that country will not be sold without an Os. In the same deal Volume licensing is sold for Windows with agreements to either limit or stop all other Os's. Then when all of the above don't work then drastically cut prices in said county under the guise of fighting piracy. Then once MS has a strangle hold on that market their prices go back up. Any stop to piracy? No. The only ones hurt by these tactics? The consumer,their competition and MS. Why. The consumers because they have fewer choices and higher prices. The competition because they can't. MS because they only way they can continue to grow is through the above deceit. The pirates? Not if you listen to MS. Piracy is as bad as ever and growing. Is it or is it marketing? Even the EU figured this out. caver1
My System Specs

Similar Threads
Thread	Forum
Missing Windows Installer-How does it go missing?	Drivers
Movie Maker 6.0 - publising error "missing files" but files not missing	Vista music pictures video
DVD/CD-Rom missing	Vista hardware & devices
Missing Drivers That Aren't Really Missing	Drivers
Movie Maker - Missing Photos not missing Links	Vista General