One place you did not post but posted just about everywhere is the newsgroup that
this issue belongs to.
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsof...xp.network_web
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"Patrick Whittle" <patrick_whittle@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ue4iiPZUJHA.5284@xxxxxx
>I have three computers (four actually; I will explain) accessing a router
>
> for Internet access. I found out where to go, in order to modify the MAC
>
> address for the forth computer. This computer (host actually, rather than
>
> physical computer) boots from my second choice on the OS boot menu; it
>
> doesn't have a NIC installed. I decided to use a Linksys wireless USB
>
> adapter to connect to the router. Connectivity worked just fine in the
>
> beginning, but a couple months later, it failed.
>
>
>
> Then I found a way to edit a key in the registry so that MAC addresses
>
> (created through cloning) can be used by any NIC you want. I edited the key
>
> below :
>
>
>
>
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318]
>
>
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
>
> \SYSTEM
>
> \CurrentControlSet
>
> \Control
>
> \Class
>
> \{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318}
>
>
>
>
>
> That worked fine in the begging, but what the router's DHCP ended up
>
> recording was very asymmetric. It recorded the MAC address of the fourth
>
> computer as being:
>
>
>
> 524153200080C6FE884D000000000000
>
>
>
> When the MAC address is really: 52-41-53-20-00-80
>
>
>
> You can see that the MAC address was actually recorded, but with out
>
> delimiting (-) characters. The actual key structure though, is standard &
>
> documented. It is the place where all NIC producers store their MACs. Why
>
> isn't my router recording my wireless MAC address properly?
>
>
>