|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
 |
| |
10-22-2006
| #1 (permalink) |
| | Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers useless for my monitor!! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
My System Specs |
|
10-22-2006
| #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions /Hugh Jass/ said: > With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the > native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 > drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They > offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers > useless for my monitor!! You can use a lower resolution, and still see the correct aspect ratio. I have also noted that their latest driver does not support 1440X900 here, which is the Samsung's 940BW native resolution. I stuck with 96.33. |
| My System Specs |
|
10-23-2006
| #3 (permalink) |
| | RE: Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions Solved with powerstrip (thanks, Martyn) -- Jesús Guinda "Hugh Jass" wrote: > With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the > native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 > drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They > offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers > useless for my monitor!! > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > > |
| My System Specs |
|
10-23-2006
| #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions /jesusg/ said: "Hugh Jass" wrote: > > With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the > > native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 > > drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They > > offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers > > useless for my monitor!! > Solved with powerstrip (thanks, Martyn) Appears to be a nice app - for $29.95. |
| My System Specs |
|
10-23-2006
| #5 (permalink) |
| | RE: Nvidia's 96.85 drivers support fewer resolutions My 6150LE is running my 19" wide at 1440X900, on the 96.85 driver with no issue. "Hugh Jass" wrote: > With Nvidia's 96.63 drivers, I can get 1440x900 resolution, which is the > native resolution of my 19inch widescreen monitor. However, in the 96.85 > drivers, this resolution isn't supported. Why would Nvidia do this?? They > offer higher and lower settings, but NOT 1440x900. Makes these drivers > useless for my monitor!! > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > > |
| My System Specs |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Why fewer channels than on my tv | Media Center | |||
| Confirmed: Zune HD is powered by Nvidia's Tegra | Vista News | |||
| Fewer newsgroup posting errors? | Vista General | |||
| The quality of nVidia's Vista drivers? | Vista General | |||
| Creative Vista Support: Native and Drivers and planned support | Vista hardware & devices | |||
