![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | Laptop Owners -> OEM May be the Way to go I did some price checking today and as a laptop user it seems like going with an OEM version is the most economical way. If I'm not missing anything the OEM version allows for a simple clean install like the full retail version and unlike the upgrade version which requires 2000 or XP to be installed. The only drawback with the OEM version being the license is tied to the specific laptop and can't be transferred to another PC. But when I do decide to upgrade I'll simply be purchasing a more current laptop and it will come with Vista pre-installed anyway. Pricing at www.Newegg.com is as follows: Vista Ultimate Retail: $399 Vista Ultimate Upgrade: $249 Vista Ultimate OEM: $199 Vista Home Premium Retail: $227 Vista Home Premium Upgrade: $154 Vista Home Premium OEM: $120 Am I missing anything or for those that are not likely to be transferring Vista to a future PC is OEM the way to go? |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: Laptop Owners -> OEM May be the Way to go Sorry, posted this to the hardware group in error, meant to post this to the Vista.General group. "Kevin Young" <ky-nntp@sent.com> wrote in message news:9C53EBC1-D007-470C-B3E8-CAC86D703446@microsoft.com... >I did some price checking today and as a laptop user it seems like going >with an OEM version is the most economical way. If I'm not missing >anything the OEM version allows for a simple clean install like the full >retail version and unlike the upgrade version which requires 2000 or XP to >be installed. The only drawback with the OEM version being the license is >tied to the specific laptop and can't be transferred to another PC. But >when I do decide to upgrade I'll simply be purchasing a more current laptop >and it will come with Vista pre-installed anyway. Pricing at >www.Newegg.com is as follows: > > Vista Ultimate Retail: $399 > Vista Ultimate Upgrade: $249 > Vista Ultimate OEM: $199 > > Vista Home Premium Retail: $227 > Vista Home Premium Upgrade: $154 > Vista Home Premium OEM: $120 > > Am I missing anything or for those that are not likely to be transferring > Vista to a future PC is OEM the way to go? > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: Laptop Owners -> OEM May be the Way to go Just to cheer you up ... Here in the UK we have to fork out around £220 for the Home premium version of Vista, but in America you could pick up precisely the same software for $230.00 (£115) - quite a difference, isn't it? The are similar price hikes for all of the consumer versions of Vista. .......... "Vilification for Microsoft over UK Vista pricing British consumers will pay double the price of their US counterparts Anthony Dhanendran, Computeract!ve 31 Jan 2007 ADVERTISEMENTMicrosoft has come under fire for the way it will charge UK consumers for copies of Vista, the latest version of Microsoft's Windows operating system. British customers are complaining that they will have to pay nearly double what American consumers will pay. A copy of the upgrade from Windows XP to Vista Home Basic in the UK will cost £100, while American users will pay $100 which at current exchange rates is only £51 for the same item. Similar disparities occur throughout the Vista range. Microsoft chairman Bill Gates told the BBC that the company aims "to keep prices largely in line, country to country". He said that any price differences were likely to be down to exchange rate fluctuations. When contacted by Computeractive, a representative of Microsoft reiterated this stance and said: "In view of the unpredictability of exchange rate fluctuations. Microsoft believes that our customers are best served by price stability. To provide and maintain this stability, we do not make pricing changes frequently." http://www.computeractive.co.uk/comp...-vista-pricing "Kevin Young" <ky-nntp@sent.com> wrote in message news:9C53EBC1-D007-470C-B3E8-CAC86D703446@microsoft.com... >I did some price checking today and as a laptop user it seems like going >with an OEM version is the most economical way. If I'm not missing >anything the OEM version allows for a simple clean install like the full >retail version and unlike the upgrade version which requires 2000 or XP to >be installed. The only drawback with the OEM version being the license is >tied to the specific laptop and can't be transferred to another PC. But >when I do decide to upgrade I'll simply be purchasing a more current laptop >and it will come with Vista pre-installed anyway. Pricing at >www.Newegg.com is as follows: > > Vista Ultimate Retail: $399 > Vista Ultimate Upgrade: $249 > Vista Ultimate OEM: $199 > > Vista Home Premium Retail: $227 > Vista Home Premium Upgrade: $154 > Vista Home Premium OEM: $120 > > Am I missing anything or for those that are not likely to be transferring > Vista to a future PC is OEM the way to go? > > |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: Laptop Owners -> OEM May be the Way to go MS is just recouping all the fees and lawsuit costs incurred by the EU from its citizens. On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:25:15 -0000, "Jdr" <jdr@msn.net> wrote: >Just to cheer you up ... > >Here in the UK we have to fork out around £220 for the Home premium version >of Vista, > but in America you could pick up precisely the same software for $230.00 >(£115) - >quite a difference, isn't it? >The are similar price hikes for all of the consumer versions of Vista. > >......... >"Vilification for Microsoft over UK Vista pricing >British consumers will pay double the price of their US counterparts > >Anthony Dhanendran, Computeract!ve 31 Jan 2007 > >ADVERTISEMENTMicrosoft has come under fire for the way it will charge UK >consumers for copies of Vista, the latest version of Microsoft's Windows >operating system. > >British customers are complaining that they will have to pay nearly double >what American consumers will pay. A copy of the upgrade from Windows XP to >Vista Home Basic in the UK will cost £100, while American users will pay >$100 which at current exchange rates is only £51 for the same item. Similar >disparities occur throughout the Vista range. > >Microsoft chairman Bill Gates told the BBC that the company aims "to keep >prices largely in line, country to country". He said that any price >differences were likely to be down to exchange rate fluctuations. > >When contacted by Computeractive, a representative of Microsoft reiterated >this stance and said: "In view of the unpredictability of exchange rate >fluctuations. Microsoft believes that our customers are best served by price >stability. To provide and maintain this stability, we do not make pricing >changes frequently." > >http://www.computeractive.co.uk/comp...-vista-pricing > > > >"Kevin Young" <ky-nntp@sent.com> wrote in message >news:9C53EBC1-D007-470C-B3E8-CAC86D703446@microsoft.com... >>I did some price checking today and as a laptop user it seems like going >>with an OEM version is the most economical way. If I'm not missing >>anything the OEM version allows for a simple clean install like the full >>retail version and unlike the upgrade version which requires 2000 or XP to >>be installed. The only drawback with the OEM version being the license is >>tied to the specific laptop and can't be transferred to another PC. But >>when I do decide to upgrade I'll simply be purchasing a more current laptop >>and it will come with Vista pre-installed anyway. Pricing at >>www.Newegg.com is as follows: >> >> Vista Ultimate Retail: $399 >> Vista Ultimate Upgrade: $249 >> Vista Ultimate OEM: $199 >> >> Vista Home Premium Retail: $227 >> Vista Home Premium Upgrade: $154 >> Vista Home Premium OEM: $120 >> >> Am I missing anything or for those that are not likely to be transferring >> Vista to a future PC is OEM the way to go? >> >> Thanks |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| | Re: Laptop Owners -> OEM May be the Way to go <MS is just recouping all the fees and lawsuit costs incurred by the EU from its citizens.> What is Microsoft recouping in Australia? We are charged equivalent to about US$352 for the Home premium version of Vista. Why is US being advantaged? "Steve Jain" <noreply.-@-.essjae.com> wrote in message news:rqk7s21ah0ejhf8bs3qij1hlrnkp1d9ulf@4ax.com... > MS is just recouping all the fees and lawsuit costs incurred by the EU > from its citizens. > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:25:15 -0000, "Jdr" <jdr@msn.net> wrote: > >>Just to cheer you up ... >> >>Here in the UK we have to fork out around £220 for the Home premium >>version >>of Vista, >> but in America you could pick up precisely the same software for $230.00 >>(£115) - >>quite a difference, isn't it? >>The are similar price hikes for all of the consumer versions of Vista. >> >>......... >>"Vilification for Microsoft over UK Vista pricing >>British consumers will pay double the price of their US counterparts >> >>Anthony Dhanendran, Computeract!ve 31 Jan 2007 >> >>ADVERTISEMENTMicrosoft has come under fire for the way it will charge UK >>consumers for copies of Vista, the latest version of Microsoft's Windows >>operating system. >> >>British customers are complaining that they will have to pay nearly double >>what American consumers will pay. A copy of the upgrade from Windows XP to >>Vista Home Basic in the UK will cost £100, while American users will pay >>$100 which at current exchange rates is only £51 for the same item. >>Similar >>disparities occur throughout the Vista range. >> >>Microsoft chairman Bill Gates told the BBC that the company aims "to keep >>prices largely in line, country to country". He said that any price >>differences were likely to be down to exchange rate fluctuations. >> >>When contacted by Computeractive, a representative of Microsoft reiterated >>this stance and said: "In view of the unpredictability of exchange rate >>fluctuations. Microsoft believes that our customers are best served by >>price >>stability. To provide and maintain this stability, we do not make pricing >>changes frequently." >> >>http://www.computeractive.co.uk/comp...-vista-pricing >> >> >> >>"Kevin Young" <ky-nntp@sent.com> wrote in message >>news:9C53EBC1-D007-470C-B3E8-CAC86D703446@microsoft.com... >>>I did some price checking today and as a laptop user it seems like going >>>with an OEM version is the most economical way. If I'm not missing >>>anything the OEM version allows for a simple clean install like the full >>>retail version and unlike the upgrade version which requires 2000 or XP >>>to >>>be installed. The only drawback with the OEM version being the license >>>is >>>tied to the specific laptop and can't be transferred to another PC. But >>>when I do decide to upgrade I'll simply be purchasing a more current >>>laptop >>>and it will come with Vista pre-installed anyway. Pricing at >>>www.Newegg.com is as follows: >>> >>> Vista Ultimate Retail: $399 >>> Vista Ultimate Upgrade: $249 >>> Vista Ultimate OEM: $199 >>> >>> Vista Home Premium Retail: $227 >>> Vista Home Premium Upgrade: $154 >>> Vista Home Premium OEM: $120 >>> >>> Am I missing anything or for those that are not likely to be >>> transferring >>> Vista to a future PC is OEM the way to go? >>> >>> > Thanks |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| question for logitech G5 owners | Gaming | |||
| Question for th Owners | Chillout Room | |||
| For BFG AGP Graphic Card owners | Graphic cards | |||
| For owners of NERO 8 - Fix | Vista General | |||
| One for Vista owners. | Vista General | |||