Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista hardware & devices

Vista - Difference between actual/reported RAM

Reply
 
Old 02-23-2007   #1 (permalink)
Peter


 
 

Difference between actual/reported RAM

When I had 2gb of RAM Windows reported 1.86gb. I just doubled it to 4gb and
it shows in the BIOS as 4gb but in Windows only 2.85gb. I realise that it's
probably being eaten alive by my video and TV-FM cards plus other
parerphernalia but isn't that loss a bit much?
Is there anything I can do to improve matters or should I just ignore it?

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-23-2007   #2 (permalink)
Jim Macklin


 
 

Re: Difference between actual/reported RAM

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291988


"Peter" <ex-brit AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message
news:%232otoF5VHHA.3592@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
| When I had 2gb of RAM Windows reported 1.86gb. I just
doubled it to 4gb and
| it shows in the BIOS as 4gb but in Windows only 2.85gb. I
realise that it's
| probably being eaten alive by my video and TV-FM cards
plus other
| parerphernalia but isn't that loss a bit much?
| Is there anything I can do to improve matters or should I
just ignore it?
|
| --
| Peter
| Toronto, Canada
| XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
| P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
| ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
| Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio
|
|


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-23-2007   #3 (permalink)
Peter


 
 

Re: Difference between actual/reported RAM

Thanks Jim, but that is as clear as mud to me unfortunately.

--
Peter
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate
P4 HT @ 3.0ghz, 700gb HDD, 4.0gb DDR
Soundblaster Audigy 4/ATI Radeon 9550 SE/Asus 7135 TV-FM
"Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote in message
news:%23Jdqfr5VHHA.4668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291988
>
>
> "Peter" <ex-brit AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message
> news:%232otoF5VHHA.3592@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> | When I had 2gb of RAM Windows reported 1.86gb. I just
> doubled it to 4gb and
> | it shows in the BIOS as 4gb but in Windows only 2.85gb. I
> realise that it's
> | probably being eaten alive by my video and TV-FM cards
> plus other
> | parerphernalia but isn't that loss a bit much?
> | Is there anything I can do to improve matters or should I
> just ignore it?
> |
> | --
> | Peter
> | Toronto, Canada
> | XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
> | P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
> | ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
> | Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio
> |
> |
>
>


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-24-2007   #4 (permalink)
BigJim


 
 

Re: Difference between actual/reported RAM

windows will not recognize 4 gigs of ram and it is also a limit of the
chipset on the board. It is just a limitation. If you want to run and see 4
gig of ram you need a 64 bit OS. I never did find out if it is being used
even if you can't see it. Even with Vista, 2 megs of ram is plenty.


"Peter" <ex-brit AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message
news:%232otoF5VHHA.3592@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> When I had 2gb of RAM Windows reported 1.86gb. I just doubled it to 4gb
> and it shows in the BIOS as 4gb but in Windows only 2.85gb. I realise
> that it's probably being eaten alive by my video and TV-FM cards plus
> other parerphernalia but isn't that loss a bit much?
> Is there anything I can do to improve matters or should I just ignore it?
>
> --
> Peter
> Toronto, Canada
> XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
> P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
> ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
> Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio
>
>



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-24-2007   #5 (permalink)
Peter


 
 

Re: Difference between actual/reported RAM

When I removed the extra 2gb the system took forever to boot for some
reason, so now it's back in. A waste I guess but hopefully wont damage
anything.

--
Peter
XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate
P4 HT @ 3.0ghz, 700gb HDD, 4.0gb DDR
Soundblaster Audigy 4/ATI Radeon 9550 SE/Asus 7135 TV-FM
"BigJim" <woody10277@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8tqdnR3Y6o78T0LYnZ2dnUVZ_ragnZ2d@comcast.com...
> windows will not recognize 4 gigs of ram and it is also a limit of the
> chipset on the board. It is just a limitation. If you want to run and see
> 4 gig of ram you need a 64 bit OS. I never did find out if it is being
> used even if you can't see it. Even with Vista, 2 megs of ram is plenty.
>
>
> "Peter" <ex-brit AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message
> news:%232otoF5VHHA.3592@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> When I had 2gb of RAM Windows reported 1.86gb. I just doubled it to 4gb
>> and it shows in the BIOS as 4gb but in Windows only 2.85gb. I realise
>> that it's probably being eaten alive by my video and TV-FM cards plus
>> other parerphernalia but isn't that loss a bit much?
>> Is there anything I can do to improve matters or should I just ignore it?
>>
>> --
>> Peter
>> Toronto, Canada
>> XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate fully updated
>> P4 D865GBFL HT @ 3.0ghz 2.0gb DDR 700gb HD
>> ATI Radeon 9550 Graphics
>> Creative Soundblaster Audigy 4 Audio
>>
>>

>
>


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-26-2007   #6 (permalink)
Gene


 
 

Where is the RAM

A 32 bit system will only addrss 3 gig of RAM. You won't see all 32 in Vista because some addresses are used by the video card and for other things (think available unique addresses rather than RAM). The mother board will also limit you based on the chipset.

If you are using dual channel memory you have to make sure that you left the remaining memory boards in the proper slots for dual channel to work (Probably every other slot). I have four gigs installed just for symmetry so that the memory will run dual channel. You don't want an odd number of slots occupied. I still only get to use 2.85 gigs

EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
http://www.eggheadcafe.com
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 02-28-2007   #7 (permalink)
Steve Jain


 
 

Re: Where is the RAM

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:07:22 -0800, Gene wrote:

>A 32 bit system will only addrss 3 gig of RAM. You won't see all 32 in Vista because some addresses are used by the video card and for other things (think available unique addresses rather than RAM). The mother board will also limit you based on the chipset.
>
>If you are using dual channel memory you have to make sure that you left the remaining memory boards in the proper slots for dual channel to work (Probably every other slot). I have four gigs installed just for symmetry so that the memory will run dual channel. You don't want an odd number of slots occupied. I still only get to use 2.85 gigs
>
>EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
>http://www.eggheadcafe.com


x64 Vista will allow you to see all your RAM without issue.

--
Cheers,
Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
http://vpc.essjae.com/
My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Re: Changing from DN to just users actual name? PowerShell
Changing from DN to just users actual name? PowerShell
If you need and want something real, actual and genuine so let hav Vista General
Actual problems Vista General
Actual Difference? Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46