![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| | lower vista experience score? I just swapped graphics cards from an ATI x600 128MB DDR w/ hypermemory to 256 MB to a Nvidia 7100GS 256MB DDR2. The Nvidia card is better in every aspect except the core clock speed. I believe the ATI is a 400 MHz core (it might be as much as 500 MHz), and the Nvidia has a 350MHz core. I reevaluated my Vista experience score after the swap, and it dropped from a 3.7 to 3.0! Would the difference in core speeds make that much of a difference? I've heard stories of the score doing some weird things with scores pertaining to graphics cards, but am now experiencing it firsthand. Should I keep my Nvidia card, or keep the ATI? I don't play too many really graphics intensive games, Civ IV is probably the biggest resource hog, but I am putting a TV tuner in later this week so which card would be better for that application? Thanks for your help, Todd |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| | Re: lower vista experience score? You should be fine as long as you are not putting in a HDTV tuner card. The memory bus width and the effective memory speed are also very important. As long as you have 128mb of graphics memory you can handle a HDTV tuner card. "Todd Marks" <ToddMarks@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:8F4C3B05-2F2C-4174-8F13-7BE019BBDAA0@microsoft.com... >I just swapped graphics cards from an ATI x600 128MB DDR w/ hypermemory to > 256 MB to a Nvidia 7100GS 256MB DDR2. The Nvidia card is better in every > aspect except the core clock speed. I believe the ATI is a 400 MHz core > (it > might be as much as 500 MHz), and the Nvidia has a 350MHz core. I > reevaluated my Vista experience score after the swap, and it dropped from > a > 3.7 to 3.0! Would the difference in core speeds make that much of a > difference? I've heard stories of the score doing some weird things with > scores pertaining to graphics cards, but am now experiencing it firsthand. > Should I keep my Nvidia card, or keep the ATI? I don't play too many > really > graphics intensive games, Civ IV is probably the biggest resource hog, but > I > am putting a TV tuner in later this week so which card would be better for > that application? Thanks for your help, > > Todd |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| | Re: lower vista experience score? I would certainly expect the AIT card to be the better pewformer with video due to its higher memory bandwith. "Todd Marks" <ToddMarks@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:8F4C3B05-2F2C-4174-8F13-7BE019BBDAA0@microsoft.com... >I just swapped graphics cards from an ATI x600 128MB DDR w/ hypermemory to > 256 MB to a Nvidia 7100GS 256MB DDR2. The Nvidia card is better in every > aspect except the core clock speed. I believe the ATI is a 400 MHz core > (it > might be as much as 500 MHz), and the Nvidia has a 350MHz core. I > reevaluated my Vista experience score after the swap, and it dropped from > a > 3.7 to 3.0! Would the difference in core speeds make that much of a > difference? I've heard stories of the score doing some weird things with > scores pertaining to graphics cards, but am now experiencing it firsthand. > Should I keep my Nvidia card, or keep the ATI? I don't play too many > really > graphics intensive games, Civ IV is probably the biggest resource hog, but > I > am putting a TV tuner in later this week so which card would be better for > that application? Thanks for your help, > > Todd |
My System Specs![]() |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| | Re: lower vista experience score? Todd; Be concerned less about the numbers and more about actual performance. Which one runs your programs better? -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "Todd Marks" <ToddMarks@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:8F4C3B05-2F2C-4174-8F13-7BE019BBDAA0@microsoft.com... >I just swapped graphics cards from an ATI x600 128MB DDR w/ >hypermemory to > 256 MB to a Nvidia 7100GS 256MB DDR2. The Nvidia card is better in > every > aspect except the core clock speed. I believe the ATI is a 400 MHz > core (it > might be as much as 500 MHz), and the Nvidia has a 350MHz core. I > reevaluated my Vista experience score after the swap, and it dropped > from a > 3.7 to 3.0! Would the difference in core speeds make that much of a > difference? I've heard stories of the score doing some weird things > with > scores pertaining to graphics cards, but am now experiencing it > firsthand. > Should I keep my Nvidia card, or keep the ATI? I don't play too > many really > graphics intensive games, Civ IV is probably the biggest resource > hog, but I > am putting a TV tuner in later this week so which card would be > better for > that application? Thanks for your help, > > Todd |
My System Specs![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Added memory = lower Windows Experience score? | Vista General | |||
| More RAM lower index score | General Discussion | |||
| lower score | Vista General | |||
| base score lower than expected | Vista General | |||
| memory score and cpu scores lower than expected. | Vista General | |||