Windows Vista Forums
Vista Forums Home Join Vista Forums Windows 7 Forum Vista Tutorials Tags
Welcome to Windows Vista Forums. Our forum is dedicated to helping you find solutions with any problems, errors or issues you are experiencing with Windows Vista. The Vista forum also covers news and updates and has an extensive Windows Vista tutorial section that covers a wide range of tips and tricks.

Go Back   Vista Forums > Vista Newsgroups > Vista hardware & devices

Vista - lower vista experience score?

Reply
 
Old 04-30-2007   #1 (permalink)
Todd Marks


 
 

lower vista experience score?

I just swapped graphics cards from an ATI x600 128MB DDR w/ hypermemory to
256 MB to a Nvidia 7100GS 256MB DDR2. The Nvidia card is better in every
aspect except the core clock speed. I believe the ATI is a 400 MHz core (it
might be as much as 500 MHz), and the Nvidia has a 350MHz core. I
reevaluated my Vista experience score after the swap, and it dropped from a
3.7 to 3.0! Would the difference in core speeds make that much of a
difference? I've heard stories of the score doing some weird things with
scores pertaining to graphics cards, but am now experiencing it firsthand.
Should I keep my Nvidia card, or keep the ATI? I don't play too many really
graphics intensive games, Civ IV is probably the biggest resource hog, but I
am putting a TV tuner in later this week so which card would be better for
that application? Thanks for your help,

Todd

My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-30-2007   #2 (permalink)
Curious


 
 

Re: lower vista experience score?

You should be fine as long as you are not putting in a HDTV tuner card.
The memory bus width and the effective memory speed are also very important.
As long as you have 128mb of graphics memory you can handle a HDTV tuner
card.
"Todd Marks" <ToddMarks@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8F4C3B05-2F2C-4174-8F13-7BE019BBDAA0@microsoft.com...
>I just swapped graphics cards from an ATI x600 128MB DDR w/ hypermemory to
> 256 MB to a Nvidia 7100GS 256MB DDR2. The Nvidia card is better in every
> aspect except the core clock speed. I believe the ATI is a 400 MHz core
> (it
> might be as much as 500 MHz), and the Nvidia has a 350MHz core. I
> reevaluated my Vista experience score after the swap, and it dropped from
> a
> 3.7 to 3.0! Would the difference in core speeds make that much of a
> difference? I've heard stories of the score doing some weird things with
> scores pertaining to graphics cards, but am now experiencing it firsthand.
> Should I keep my Nvidia card, or keep the ATI? I don't play too many
> really
> graphics intensive games, Civ IV is probably the biggest resource hog, but
> I
> am putting a TV tuner in later this week so which card would be better for
> that application? Thanks for your help,
>
> Todd



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 04-30-2007   #3 (permalink)
JW


 
 

Re: lower vista experience score?

I would certainly expect the AIT card to be the better pewformer with video
due to its higher memory bandwith.
"Todd Marks" <ToddMarks@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8F4C3B05-2F2C-4174-8F13-7BE019BBDAA0@microsoft.com...
>I just swapped graphics cards from an ATI x600 128MB DDR w/ hypermemory to
> 256 MB to a Nvidia 7100GS 256MB DDR2. The Nvidia card is better in every
> aspect except the core clock speed. I believe the ATI is a 400 MHz core
> (it
> might be as much as 500 MHz), and the Nvidia has a 350MHz core. I
> reevaluated my Vista experience score after the swap, and it dropped from
> a
> 3.7 to 3.0! Would the difference in core speeds make that much of a
> difference? I've heard stories of the score doing some weird things with
> scores pertaining to graphics cards, but am now experiencing it firsthand.
> Should I keep my Nvidia card, or keep the ATI? I don't play too many
> really
> graphics intensive games, Civ IV is probably the biggest resource hog, but
> I
> am putting a TV tuner in later this week so which card would be better for
> that application? Thanks for your help,
>
> Todd



My System SpecsSystem Spec
Old 05-01-2007   #4 (permalink)
Jupiter Jones [MVP]


 
 

Re: lower vista experience score?

Todd;
Be concerned less about the numbers and more about actual performance.
Which one runs your programs better?

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Todd Marks" <ToddMarks@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8F4C3B05-2F2C-4174-8F13-7BE019BBDAA0@microsoft.com...
>I just swapped graphics cards from an ATI x600 128MB DDR w/
>hypermemory to
> 256 MB to a Nvidia 7100GS 256MB DDR2. The Nvidia card is better in
> every
> aspect except the core clock speed. I believe the ATI is a 400 MHz
> core (it
> might be as much as 500 MHz), and the Nvidia has a 350MHz core. I
> reevaluated my Vista experience score after the swap, and it dropped
> from a
> 3.7 to 3.0! Would the difference in core speeds make that much of a
> difference? I've heard stories of the score doing some weird things
> with
> scores pertaining to graphics cards, but am now experiencing it
> firsthand.
> Should I keep my Nvidia card, or keep the ATI? I don't play too
> many really
> graphics intensive games, Civ IV is probably the biggest resource
> hog, but I
> am putting a TV tuner in later this week so which card would be
> better for
> that application? Thanks for your help,
>
> Todd


My System SpecsSystem Spec
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Added memory = lower Windows Experience score? Vista General
More RAM lower index score General Discussion
lower score Vista General
base score lower than expected Vista General
memory score and cpu scores lower than expected. Vista General


Vista Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized,
sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation.
"Windows Vista", the Start Orb, and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
© Designer Media Ltd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46